skip to main content

IN VIVO DIGESTIBILITY OF PROTEIN EXTRACTED FROM BRACKISH ALGAE CHAETOMORPHA SP.

Institute of Tropical Biology, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam

Received: 3 Sep 2024; Revised: 16 Jan 2025; Accepted: 1 Feb 2025; Available online: 30 Apr 2025; Published: 30 Apr 2025.

Citation Format:
Abstract

ABSTRACT

Background: Chaetomorpha sp., a species of green brackish algae, has a high biomass distribution in extensive shrimp ponds in Mekong Delta.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the nutritional value of Chaetomorpha sp. algae protein concentrate by assessing its in vivo digestibility and comparing it to soy protein as a reference for food applications.

Materials and Methods: Nutritive values such as PER (Protein Efficiency Ratio), NPR (Net Protein Ratio), and BV (Biological Value) were determined through in vivo trials on white mice. These mice were fed test diets containing Chaetomorpha sp. algae protein concentrate (APC), soy protein concentrate (SPC), and a regular diet provided by the Pasteur Institute in Ho Chi Minh City. The data were collected after 4 weeks of feeding the mice with the different diets.

Results:The PER, NPR, and BV values of Chaetomorpha sp. APC were 2.12, 3.28, and 79.32, respectively. These values were comparable to those of SPC and much higher than those of regular rice bran-based diet.

Conclusion: The protein concentrate derived from Chaetomorpha sp. algae has a high protein content (76.3% w/w db), possesses good nutritional value, and is a viable source of plant-based protein for food applications.

Keywords: Chaetomorpha sp.; green brackish algae; in vivo digestibility; nutritive value; algae protein concentrate

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Chaetomorpha sp.; green brackish algae; in vivo digestibility; nutritive value; algae protein concentrate

Article Metrics:

  1. Naselli-Flores L, Barone R. Green Algae, Encyclopedia of Inland Waters. Elsevier Inc.; 2009.166-173. DOI: 10.1016/B978-012370626-3.00134-4
  2. Hoang KA, Le THA, Bach NM, Nguyen MH. Chemical composition of Chaetomorpha sp. brackish algae in the Mekong Delta. Journal of Science and Technology. 2014; 52(5A):247-254
  3. Xu J, Liao W, Liu Y, Guo Y, Jiang S. and Zhao C. An overview on the nutritional and bioactive components of green seaweeds. Food Production, Processing and Nutrition. 2023; 5(1):18. DOI: 10.1186/s43014-023-00132-5
  4. Wu JY, Tso R, Teo HS, and Haldar S. The utility of algae as sources of high value nutritional ingredients, particularly for alternative/complementary proteins to improve human health. Frontier in Nutrition. 2023; 10.3389. DOI 10.3389/fnut.2023.1277343
  5. Karabulut G, Purkiewicz A, Goksen G. Recent developments and challenges in algal protein and peptide extraction strategies, functional and technological properties, bioaccessibility, and commercial applications, Comprehensive Review in Food Science and Food Safety. 2024; 23(3):e13372. DOI: 10.1111/1541-4337.13372
  6. Wang Y, Tibbetts SM, Berrue F, McGinn PJ, MacQuarrie SP, Puttaswamy A, Patelakis S, Schmidt D, Melanson R. and MacKenzie SE. Rat Study to Evaluate the Protein Quality of Three Green Microalgal Species and the Impact of Mechanical Cell Wall Disruption. Foods. 2020; 9:1531. DOI: 10.3390/foods9111531
  7. Lima E Silva MCB, Hiane PA, Braga Neto JA, Macedo MLA. Proteins of Bacuri almonds - Nutrional value and in vivo digestibility. Food Science and Technology. 2014; 34:55-61. DOI: 10.1590/S0101-20612014000100008
  8. Abiose SH, Ikujenlola AV, Abioderin FI. Nutritional quality assessment of complementary foods produced from fermented and malted quality protein maize fortified with soybean flour. Polish Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences. 2015; 65(1):49-56. DOI: 10.1515/pjfns-2015-0004
  9. Asemi Z, Taghizade M, Sarahroodi S, Tehran HA. Biological evaluation of protein quality of two homemade cereal/legume mixtures and a commercial weaning food. Electronic Physician. 2010; 2:85-94
  10. Tavano OL, Neves VA, and da Silva Júnior SI. In vitro versus in vivo protein digestibility techniques for calculating PDCAAS (protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score) applied to chickpea fractions. Food Research International. 2016; 89(1):756-763. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2016.10.005
  11. Reeves PG, Rossow KL, and Lindlauf J. Development and testing of the AIN-93 purified diets for rodents: results on growth, kidney calcification and bone mineralization in rats and mice. The Journal of nutrition. 1993; 123(11):1923-1931. DOI: 10.1093/jn/123.11.1923
  12. Kinyi HW, Kato CD, Tusubira D, Kiwanuka GN. Comparison of the Nutritional Status of Swiss Albino Mice Fed on Either a Purified or Cereal-Based Diet for 15 weeks, Biochemistry Research International. 2023; 2023:e9121174. DOI: 10.1155/2023/9121174
  13. Martínez R, García-Beltrán A, Kapravelou G, Mesas C, Cabeza L, Perazzoli G, Guarnizo P, Rodríguez-López A, Vallejo RA, Galisteo M, Aranda P, Prados J, López-Jurado M, Melguizo C and Porres JM. In Vivo Nutritional Assessment of the Microalga Nannochloropsis gaditana and Evaluation of the Antioxidant and Antiproliferative Capacity of Its Functional Extracts. Marine Drug. 2022; 20:318. DOI: 10.3390/md20050318
  14. Urbano MG, Goñi I. Bioavailability of nutrients in rats fed on edible seaweeds, nori (Porphyra tenera) and wakame (Undaria pinnatifida), as a source of dietary fibre. Food Chem. 2002; 76:281–286. DOI: 10.1016/S0308-8146(01)00273-4
  15. Bleakley S. and Hayes M. Algal Proteins: Extraction, Application, and Challenges Concerning Production. Foods. 2017; 6(5):33. DOI: 10.3390/foods6050033
  16. Bach NM, Huynh HM, Hoang KA, Ngo KS. Optimization of protein extraction from green alage Chaetomorpha sp. biomass using surface response methodology. Science & Technology Development Journal: Natural Sciences. 2019; 3(3):136-143. DOI: 10.32508/stdjns.v3i2.864
  17. Geada P, Moreira C, Silva M, Nunes R, Madureira L, Rocha MRC, Pereira NR, Vicente AA, Teixeira JA. Algal proteins: Production strategies and nutritional and functional properties. Bioresource Technology. 2021; 332:125125. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125125
  18. Singha HA, Sengupta M, Bawari M. Neurobehavioral responses in Swiss albino mice induced by an aqueous leaf extract from a medicinal plant named Heliotropium incanum Ruiz & Pav. Bioinformation. 2020;16(9): 679-687. DOI: 10.6026/97320630016679
  19. National Research Council. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, 8th Edition, National Academies Press (US). 2011. DOI: 10.17226/12910
  20. AOAC Official Method 950.46 2006: Moisture in Meat
  21. AOAC Official Method 992.15: Crude Protein in Meat and Meat Products
  22. AOAC Official 960.39: Fat (Crude) or Ether Extract in Meat
  23. AOAC Official Method 920.153: Ash of Meat
  24. AOAC Official Method 991.43: Total, Soluble, and Insoluble Dietary Fiber in Foods: Enzymatic-Gravimetric Method, MES-TRIS Buffer
  25. AOAC Official Methods 978.02: Determination of Kjeldahl nitrogen in fertilizers
  26. Sarwar G. The protein digestibility - corrected amino acid score method overestimates quality of proteins containing antinutritional factors and of poorly digestible proteins supplemented with limiting amino acids in rats. The Journal of nutrition. 1997; 127(5):758-764. DOI: 10.1093/jn/127.5.758
  27. Abdel-Aziz S, Hussein L, Esmail S, el-Awadi N. In vivo rat assay for true protein digestibility and protein quality of beef and meat products extended with soy protein. International journal of food sciences and nutrition. 1997; 48(1):51-56. DOI: 10.3109/09637489709006963
  28. Agular EG, Albarracin GDJ, Unates MA, Piola HD, Camina JM, Escudero NL. Evaluation of the nutritional quality of the grain protein of new amaranths varieties. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition. 2015; 70(1):21-26. DOI: 10.1007/s11130-014-0456-3
  29. Ayalew Y, Retta N, Desse G, Mohammed A, Mellesse A. Amino acid profile and protein quality in tuber and leaf of Cocnia abyssinia (Lam.) (Cogn.) accessions of Ethopia. Food Science and Nutrition. 2016; 5(3):722-729. DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.452
  30. Zeng Y, Chen E, Zhang X, Li D, Wang Q and Sun Y. Nutritional Value and Physicochemical Characteristics of Alternative Protein for Meat and Dairy - A Review. Foods. 2022: 11(21):3326. DOI: 10.3390/foods11213326

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.