Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan skip to main content

Eksplorasi faktor yang mempengaruhi motivasi knowledge sharing pengikut akun X @literarybase

*Deria Ramadayanti  -  Program Studi Ilmu Perpustakaan, Fakultas Ilmu Budaya, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Roro Isyawati Permata Ganggi  -  Program Studi Ilmu Perpustakaan, Fakultas Ilmu Budaya, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

The development of social media has had an impact on the ease of human interaction and the sharing of knowledge. One of the social media platforms that is developing in Indonesia is Twitter. In 2022, Indonesian Twitter users reached 18.45 million. One Twitter account with many followers who have an interest in books, literature, and reading is @literarybase. This study aims to determine the motivation of @literarybase followers to carry out knowledge sharing. The method used in this study is a qualitative method with a phenomenological approach. Data gathered through observation and interviews. The data analysis method used is thematic analysis. The results of the study show that there are three themes that motivate followers of the @literarybase account to share knowledge, namely; (1) the freedom of followers of the @literarybase account to do what they want; (2) Increased competence of @literarybase followers; (3) Feelings of interrelationship between followers of the @literarybase account. 

Fulltext
Keywords: Knowledge sharing; social media; motivation; X; @literarybase
  1. Ahmad, F., & Karim, M. (2019). Impacts of knowledge sharing: a review and directions for future research. In Journal of Workplace Learning (Vol. 31, Issue 3, pp. 207–230). Emerald Group Holdings Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-07-2018-0096
  2. Ahmed, Y. A., Ahmad, M. N., Ahmad, N., & Zakaria, N. H. (2019). Social media for knowledge-sharing: A systematic literature review. In Telematics and Informatics (Vol. 37, pp. 72–112). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.01.015
  3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  4. Chang, H. H., & Chuang, S. S. (2011). Social capital and individual motivations on knowledge sharing: Participant involvement as a moderator. Information and Management, 48(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2010.11.001
  5. Dwiwina, R. H., & Putri, K. Y. S. (2021). The Use of the Auto Base Accounts on Twitter as A Media for Sharing Opinions. Ultimacomm: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 123–144. https://doi.org/10.31937/ultimacomm.v13i1.1603
  6. Gilbert, S. (2016). Learning in a Twitter-based community of practice: an exploration of knowledge exchange as a motivation for participation in #hcsmca. Information Communication and Society, 19(9), 1214–1232. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1186715
  7. Herdiansyah, H. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif untuk Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial. Salemba Humanika
  8. Hosen, M., Ogbeibu, S., Giridharan, B., Cham, T. H., Lim, W. M., & Paul, J. (2021). Individual motivation and social media influence on student knowledge sharing and learning performance: Evidence from an emerging economy. Computers and Education, 172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104262
  9. Jung, Y. (2011). Understanding the role of sense of presence and perceived autonomy in users’ continued use of social virtual worlds. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 16(4), 492–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2011.01540.x
  10. Kemp, S. (2022). DIGITAL 2022: INDONESIA. Https://Datareportal.Com/Reports/Digital-2022-Indonesia
  11. Lay, J. C., & Hoppmann, C. A. (2015). Altruism and Prosocial Behavior. In Encyclopedia of Geropsychology (pp. 1–9). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-080-3_69-1
  12. Mladenović, D., & Krajina, A. (2020). Knowledge sharing on social media: State of the art in 2018. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 21(1), 44–63. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2019.11407
  13. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
  14. Shwartz-Asher, D., Chun, S., Adam, N. R., & Snider, K. L. (2020). Knowledge sharing behaviors in social media. Technology in Society, 63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101426
  15. Uno, H. B. (2006). Teori Motivasi dan Pengukurannya: Analisis di Bidang Pendidikan. PT. Bumi Aksara
  16. Wang, S., & Noe, R. A. (2010). Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 20(2), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.10.001
  17. Wang, W. T., & Hou, Y. P. (2015). Motivations of employees’ knowledge sharing behaviors: A self-determination perspective. Information and Organization, 25(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2014.11.001
  18. Yao, Q., Li, R. Y. M., Song, L., & Crabbe, M. J. C. (2021). Safety knowledge sharing on Twitter: A social network analysis. Safety Science, 143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105411
  19. Yoon, C., & Rolland, E. (2012). Knowledge-sharing in virtual communities: Familiarity, anonymity and self-determination -Theory. Behaviour and Information Technology, 31(11), 1133–1143. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2012.702355
  20. Zhang, Y., Fang, Y., Wei, K. K., & Chen, H. (2010). Exploring the role of psychological safety in promoting the intention to continue sharing knowledge in virtual communities. International Journal of Information Management, 30(5), 425–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.02.003

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.