DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/tpwk.2021.30834

Penentuan Jaringan Jalan untuk Lajur Pesepeda (Studi Kasus: Kota Semarang)

*Hafidz Aliyudin  -  Departemen Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota Fakultas Teknik Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Rukuh Setiadi  -  Departemen Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota Fakultas Teknik Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

The increase in the population of Semarang City has implications for the rapid increase in the number of motorized vehicles. On that basis, Semarang City Government developed a policy idea with a road network development program for bike lanes as a solution to increase the use of non-motorized vehicles. The lack of supporting infrastructure for bicycle lanes makes the community feel less comfortable, less safe, and less interested when using bicycles on the highway. The purpose of this study is to determine the road network for bike lane in Semarang city. The method used is a mixed method with descriptive analysis and overlay analysis. The results of this study stated that the road network for bicycle lanes in Semarang City more suitable for recreation and sports, the road network zone for bicycle lane in Semarang City divided is five priorities, and the suitability of the road network zones for bicycle lanes and the bicycle road network plan shows there are 16 suitable road networks out of 19 planned road networks.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Road Network; Bicycle Lanes; Semarang City

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Recent articles
Karakteristik Sosial Ekonomi Penghuni (Penyewa) dalam Perumahan Bersubsidi di Kecamatan Ungaran Timur Kerentanaan dan Strategi Adaptasi Masyarakat Terhadap Bencana Rob di Kawasan Pesisir Kecamatan Sayung Kabupaten Demak Evaluasi Kebijakan Bus Trans Semarang pada Koridor I – Koridor VII More recent articles
  1. Artiningsih, Muktiali, M., Y, R. K., & Kusumaningrum, R. (2011). Kajian Peluang Penerapan Jalur Sepeda di Kota Semarang. Jurnal Rekayasa Ilmu Pengetahuan Teknologi, 5(Ii), 1–7
  2. Bikeway Planning and Design. (2003)
  3. Dahuri, R. (2001). Pengelolaan Ruang Wilayah Pesisir Dan Lautan Seiring Dengan Pelaksanaan Otonomi Daerah. Jurnal Sosial Dan Pembangunan, 17(2), 139–171. https://doi.org/10.29313/mimbar.v17i2.38
  4. Hrnčíř, J., Žilecký, P., Song, Q., & Jacob, M. (2016). Practical Multicriteria Urban Bicycle Routing. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 8(3), 493–504. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2016.2577047
  5. Nasution, M., & Dirgahayani, P. (2012). Pengembangan Rute Sepeda Berdasarkan Standar dan Kebutuhan Yang Mendukung Bike To Work Di Kota Bandung. Jurnal Perencanan Wilayah Dan Kota Bandung SAPPK, (1), 1–11
  6. Neufert, E. (2003). Architects Data (3rd ed.). Blackwell Science
  7. Pemerintah Kota Semarang. Peraturan Daerah Kota Semarang Nomor 14 Tahun 2011 Tentang Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Kota Semarang Tahun 2011 – 2031. , (2011)
  8. Povey, L. J., Keall, & Michael Drummond. (2000). Increasing our undestanding of New Zealanders’ travel behaviour, 1997/1998. In Travel survey report 1997/1998. Wellington: Land Transport Safety Authority
  9. Rosen, P., Cox, P., & Horton, D. (2007). Cycling and Society. ASHGATE
  10. Rybarczyk, G., & Wu, C. (2010). Bicycle facility planning using GIS and multi-criteria decision analysis. Applied Geography, 30(2), 282–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2009.08.005
  11. Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D (Research and Development). Bandung: Alfabeta
  12. Tamin, O. Z. (2000). Perencanaan dan Pemodelan Transportasi. Bandung: ITB

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.