skip to main content

Evaluasi Kebijakan Bus Trans Semarang pada Koridor I – Koridor VII

*Nisriena Rachmi Putri  -  Departemen Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota Fakultas Teknik Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Mohammad Muktiali  -  Departemen Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota Fakultas Teknik Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

In 2009, Semarang added a public transportation mode, the Trans Semarang Bus, which is a manifestation of the implementation of public transportation policies in Semarang. The research object to be discussed in this study is the policy of the Trans Semarang Bus which focuses on corridors I - corridor VII. The main problem of the research is that the Trans Semarang Bus policy has not been optimized. In fact, the number of passengers only fulfilled 76.99% of the target in Corridor I - Corridor VII. The purpose of evaluation of the Trans Semarang Bus policy is to look for the best and worst indicators, criteria and corridors of the Trans Semarang Bus policy implementation. The method is quantitative with AHP and scoring analysis techniques using 4 indicators namely Input, Process, Output and Outcome, also 6 criteria namely Effectiveness, Efficiency, Adequacy, Equity, Responsiveness and Accuracy which will be ranked by 4 experts. The result, Input indicator is ranked first, and the last is Output. The criteria that have the highest accumulative score is Justice, while the lowest is Sufficiency. The corridor which has the highest accumulative score of all indicators is Corridor I, while the lowest is Corridor VII.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Bus Rapid Transit, Public Policy, Public Transportation
  1. Adam, D., Subowo, A. & Marom, A., 2013. IMPLEMENTASI KEBIJAKAN BUS RAPID TRANSIT ( BRT ) TRANS
  2. SEMARANG DI KOTA SEMARANG. Journal Of Public Policy And Management Review, 2
  3. Azhari, A.R., Lubis, N. & Ngatno, 2015. Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan, Tarif dan Fasilitas Terhadap Kepuasan
  4. Penumpang Bus BRT Trans Semarang (Studi Kasus: Penumpang Bus BRT Trans Semarang koridor II),
  5. Semarang
  6. Bridgman, P. & Davis, G., 2000. The Australian policy handbook, Allen & Unwin
  7. Dunn, W.N., 2003. Pengantar Analisis Kebijakan Publik 2nd ed. M. Darwin, ed., Gadjah Mada University
  8. Press
  9. Kurniady, R.K. & Munggana, W., 2013. Sistem Perbandingan dan Penyediaan Informasi Kendaraan Mobil
  10. dengan Metode. ULTIMA Infosys, IV(1), pp.28–33
  11. Pradipta, E.G. & Suroso, E.S., 2014. EFEKTIVITAS BRT (Bus Rapid Transit) TRANS SEMARANG SEBAGAI MODA
  12. TRANSPORTASI DI
  13. KOTA
  14. SEMARANG. Geo-Image,
  15. Available
  16. at:
  17. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/geoimage
  18. Salasa, W. et al., 2015. EVALUASI SISTEM PELAYANAN TRANSIT ANTAR KORIDOR BUS RAPID TRANSIT TRANS
  19. SEMARANG. Jurnal Karya Teknik Sipil, 4, pp.505–511. Available at: http://ejournals1.undip.ac.id/index.php/jkts

Last update: 2021-07-28 21:14:42

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2021-07-28 21:14:42

No citation recorded.