slot gacor slot gacor hari ini slot gacor 2025 demo slot pg slot gacor slot gacor
Risk Stratification Tools in Predicting Survival and Transformation of Therapy-Related Myelodysplastic Syndrome: A Systematic Review | Rubiyat | Jurnal Kedokteran Diponegoro (Diponegoro Medical Journal)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/dmj.v13i5.46210

Risk Stratification Tools in Predicting Survival and Transformation of Therapy-Related Myelodysplastic Syndrome: A Systematic Review

*Siti Rubiyat  -  Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Tarumanagara, Jakarta, Indonesia, Indonesia
Bernadetha kusuma kris firmantya tei seran orcid  -  Saint Vincentius Hospital, Singkawang, Kalimantan Barat, Indonesia, Indonesia
Albert Tri Rustamadji  -  RAA Soewondo General Hospital, Pati, Jawa Temgah, Indonesia, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

Background: Therapy-related myelodysplastic syndromes (t-MDS) are grouped with therapy-related acute lymphoblastic leukemia (t-ALL) and therapy-related myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (t-MDS/MPN) under therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MNs). Most myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) prognostic models have excluded t-MDS patients, leaving their prognostic utility uncertain. Objective: This systematic review aims to synthesize the predictive utility of existing and novel risk stratification tools in assessing the survival and transformation of t-MDS. Methods: Searches were conducted in PubMed and ScienceDirect following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, focusing on overall survival and transforming t-MDS into acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Two reviewers independently screened references, extracted data, and assessed quality using the QUAPAS-2 tool. Results: From 1715 abstracts and 13 papers, 6 studies were included. Three studies on the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) showed significant predictive power for survival and AML transformation. Five studies on the revised IPSS (IPSS-R) and WHO-based Prognostic Scoring System-revised (WPSS-R) also showed significant results. One study highlighted the cytogenetic component of IPSS-R (cIPSS-R) as highly prognostic. Conclusion: Existing and novel risk stratification tools demonstrate significant prognostic power for t- MDS. Further refinement and validation are needed to enhance risk assessment and treatment strategies.

 

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Therapy-related Myelodysplastic Syndromes; Prognostic Stratification Tools; Survival and Transformation Prediction

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Original Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
The Correlation between Duration and Frequency of Writing Activities on Subjective Complaints of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Risk Stratification Tools in Predicting Survival and Transformation of Therapy-Related Myelodysplastic Syndrome: A Systematic Review Factors Related to Duration and Interaction of Doctor-Patient Communication at Diponegoro National Hospital Scurvy with Musculoskeletal Pain in Indonesian Pediatric Patient: A Case Report Identifying Acute Ischemic Stroke with Hemichorea as A Clinical Manifestation: A Case Report The Art of Anti-Snake Venom Administration in Snakebite Grade III Following Viper Snakebite in Developing Country: A Case Report More recent articles
  1. Li H, Hu F, Gale RP, Sekeres MA, Liang Y. Myelodysplastic syndromes. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2022 Nov 17;8(1):74
  2. Abou Zahr A, Kavi AM, Mukherjee S, Zeidan AM. Therapy-related myelodysplastic syndromes, or are they?. Blood Reviews. 2017 May 1;31(3):119-28
  3. Chen Z, Wang SA, Goswami M, Tang G, Routbort MJ, Patel KP, Luthra R, Medeiros LJ, Ok CY. Comparison of therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome with ring sideroblasts and de novo myelodysplastic syndrome with ring sideroblasts. Leukemia Research. 2019 Nov 1;86:106227
  4. Leone G, Fabiani E, Voso MT. De novo and therapy-related myelodysplastic syndromes: analogies and differences. Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases. 2022;14(1)
  5. Bejar R. Prognostic models in myelodysplastic syndromes. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2013 Dec 6;2013(1):504-10
  6. Lee EJ, Podoltsev N, Gore SD, Zeidan AM. The evolving field of prognostication and risk stratification in MDS: Recent developments and future directions. Blood reviews. 2016 Jan 1;30(1):1-0
  7. Alessandrino EP, Amadori S, Cazzola M, Locatelli F, Mecucci C, Morra E, Saglio G, Visani G, Tura S. Myelodysplastic syndromes: recent advances. Haematologica. 2001 Jan 1;86(11):1124-57
  8. Garcia‐Manero G, Chien KS, Montalban‐Bravo G. Myelodysplastic syndromes: 2021 update on diagnosis, risk stratification and management. American journal of hematology. 2020 Nov;95(11):1399-420
  9. Greaves WO, Bueso-Ramos CE. Hematopathology and Diagnostic Studies in Leukemia. Emerg Cancer Ther. 2011 Aug 29;2(2):189-218
  10. DeZern AE, Greenberg PL. The trajectory of prognostication and risk stratification for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 2023 Dec 28;142(26):2258-67
  11. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. bmj. 2021 Mar 29;372
  12. Lee J, Mulder F, Leeflang M, Wolff R, Whiting P, Bossuyt PM. QUAPAS: an adaptation of the QUADAS-2 tool to assess prognostic accuracy studies. Annals of internal medicine. 2022 Jul;175(7):1010-8
  13. Quintás-Cardama A, Daver N, Kim H, Dinardo C, Jabbour E, Kadia T, Borthakur G, Pierce S, Shan J, Cardenas-Turanzas M, Cortes J. A prognostic model of therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome for predicting survival and transformation to acute myeloid leukemia. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2014 Oct 1;14(5):401-10
  14. Moreno Berggren D, Folkvaljon Y, Engvall M, Sundberg J, Lambe M, Antunovic P, Garelius H, Lorenz F, Nilsson L, Rasmussen B, Lehmann S. Prognostic scoring systems for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) in a population‐based setting: a report from the Swedish MDS register. Br J Haematol. 2018 Jun;181(5):614-27
  15. Zeidan AM, Al Ali N, Barnard J, Padron E, Lancet JE, Sekeres MA, Steensma DP, DeZern A, Roboz G, Jabbour E, Garcia-Manero G. Comparison of clinical outcomes and prognostic utility of risk stratification tools in patients with therapy-related vs de novo myelodysplastic syndromes: a report on behalf of the MDS Clinical Research Consortium. Leukemia. 2017 Jun;31(6):1391-7
  16. Kündgen A, Nomdedeu M, Tuechler H, Garcia-Manero G, Komrokji RS, Sekeres MA, Della Porta MG, Cazzola M, DeZern AE, Roboz GJ, Steensma DP. Therapy-related myelodysplastic syndromes deserve specific diagnostic sub-classification and risk-stratification—an approach to classification of patients with t-MDS. Leukemia. 2021 Mar;35(3):835-49
  17. Cooper JP, Khajaviyan S, Smith SD, Maloney DG, Shustov AR, Warren EH, Soma LA, Lynch RC, Ujjani C, Till B, Halpern AB. Outcomes of patients with therapy-related MDS after chemoimmunotherapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia compared with patients with de novo MDS: a single-institution experience. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2019 Jun 1;19(6):390-5
  18. Bernard E, Tuechler H, Greenberg PL, Hasserjian RP, Arango Ossa JE, Nannya Y, Devlin SM, Creignou M, Pinel P, Monnier L, Gundem G. Molecular international prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes. NEJM Evid. 2022 Jun 28;1(7):EVIDoa2200008
  19. Aguirre LE, Al Ali N, Sallman DA, Ball S, Jain AG, Chan O, Tinsley-Vance SM, Kuykendall A, Sweet K, Lancet JE, Padron E. Assessment and validation of the molecular international prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes. Leukemia. 2023 Jul;37(7):1530-9
  20. Kasprzak A, Nachtkamp K, Gattermann N, Germing U. Assessing the prognosis of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Cancers. 2022 Apr 12;14(8):1941

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.