DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/dmj.v12i3.37672

THE RELATIONSHIP TETANUS SEVERITY WITH OUTCOME CLINIC

Retnaningsih Retnaningsih  -  Staff Department of Neurology Faculty of Medicine Universitas Diponegoro/Dr. Kariadi Hospital Semarang, Indonesia, Indonesia
*Hairu Zaman  -  Resident Department of Neurology Faculty of Medicine Universitas Diponegoro/Dr. Kariadi Hospital Semarang, Indonesia, Indonesia
Aris Catur Bintoro  -  Staff Department of Neurology Faculty of Medicine Universitas Diponegoro/Dr. Kariadi Hospital Semarang, Indonesia, Indonesia
Sofro Muchlis Achsan Udji  -  Staff Department of Internal Medicine Faculty of Medicine Universitas Diponegoro/Dr. Kariadi Hospital Semarang, Indonesia, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

Introduction : Tetanus is an acute toxemia caused by a neurotoxin produced by C. tetani characterized by periodic and severe muscle stiffness and spasms. Prognostic assessment is the most important thing to see the risk of mortality. Score systems are often used by clinicians such as Phillips score (1967), Ablett classification (1967), Dakar score (1975).20 Methods: This study was an analytic study with a cross-sectional design in a population of tetanus patients treated from January 2019 to December 2021. The inclusion criteria in this study were patients who had complete medical records. Information was taken from medical record data, including demographics, incubation period, Port of entry, Ablett score, Phillips score, type of wound, autonomic symptoms, clinical manifestations, comorbidities, vaccination history, complications, ventilator use, antibiotic management, length of stay and output. patient clinical. To find out the relationship between variables using the Chi-square test. Results: The results of the analysis of the relationship between the degree of Phillips score and the outcome of tetanus patients after treatment obtained p = 0.038. The results of the analysis of the relationship between the degree of Ablett score and the outcome of tetanus patients after treatment obtained p = 0.007. The results of the analysis of the relationship between the use of breathing apparatus and the output of tetanus patients after treatment obtained p = 0.041. Discussion: There is a significant relationship between the degree of Phillips score and Ablett score with the patient's clinical outcome. There is a significant relationship between the use of breathing apparatus and the patient's clinical outcome.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Tetanus, Philips Score, Ablet Score, Clinical Outcome

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Original Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
The Comparison of Clinical Characteristics of Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Patients between JCARE-CARD Japan and dr. Kariadi Hospital Registry Bone Mineral Density and Vitamin D Status in Elderly Javanese Women MONTE CARLO NEUTRON DOSE MEASUREMENT IN PROTON THERAPY FOR HEALTHCARE WORKER RADIATION SAFETY More recent articles
  1. Brauner JS, Vieira SR, Bleck TP. Changes in severe accidental tetanus mortality in the ICU during two decades in Brazil. Intensive Care Med. 2002;28(7):930-5
  2. Trujillo MH, Castillo A, España J, Manzo A, Zerpa R. Impact of intensive care management on the prognosis of tetanus. Analysis of 641 cases. Chest. 1987;92(1):63-5
  3. Bleck TP, Brauner JS. Tetanus. In: Scheld WM, Witley RJ, Marra CM, editors. Infections of the central nervous system. 3rd ed. New York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004. p. 625-48
  4. Orellana-San Martín C, Su H, Bustamante-Durán D, Velásquez-Pagoaga L. [Tetanus in intensive care units]. Rev Neurol. 2003;36(4):327-30. Spanish
  5. Fukutake T, Miyamoto R. [Clinical features of tetanus: a review with case reports]. Brain Nerve. 2011;63(10):110110. Japanese
  6. Miranda-Filho DB, Ximenes RA, Barone AA, Vaz VL, Vieira AG, Albuquerque VM. Clinical classification of tetanus patients. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2006;39(10):1329-37
  7. Hassel B. Tetanus: Pathophysiology, treatment, and the possibility of using botulinum toxin against tetanus-induced rigidity and spasms. Toxins (Basel). 2013; 5(1): 73-83
  8. Martin A. Samuels AHR. Samuels’s Manual of Neurologic Therapeutics. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010. 506–509 p
  9. Thwaites CL, Beeching NJ, Newton CR. Maternal and neonatal tetanus. Lancet (London, England). 2015 Jan;385(9965):362–70
  10. Gomes AP, Freitas BAC de, Rodrigues DC, Silveira GL da, Tavares W, Siqueira-Batista
  11. R. Clostridium tetani infections in newborn infants: a tetanus neonatorum review. Rev Bras Ter intensiva. 2011 Dec;23(4):484–91
  12. Brook I. Tetanus. In: W. Michael Scheld, Christina M. Marra RJW, editor. Infections of The Central Nervous System. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2014. p. 634–57
  13. Tejpratap S.P. Tiwari, MD; Pedro L. Moro, MD, MPH; and Anna M. Acosta M. Tetanus. In: Epidemiology and Prevention of Vaccine-Preventable Disease. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2020
  14. Ganesh M, Sheikh NK, Shah P, Mehetre G, Dharne MS, Nagoba BS. Detection of Clostridium tetani in human clinical samples using tetX specific primers targeting the neurotoxin. J Infect Public Health [Internet]. 2016;9(1):105–9. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876034115001410
  15. Clarissa Tertia, I Ketut Sumada, Ni Ketut Candra Wiratmi. Laporan Kasus: Tetanus Tipe General pada Usia Tua Tanpa Vaksinasi. Callosum Neurol. 2019;2(3):9-10
  16. Somia IKA. Management of tetanus complication. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2018;125(1). doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/125/1/012086
  17. Farrar JJ, Yen LM, Cook T, Fairweather N, Binh N, Parry J, et al. Neurological ascpects of tropical disease: Tetanus. J Neurol Neurosurg Pschiatry. 2000; 69: 292-301
  18. Somia IKA. Management of tetanus complication. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2018;125(1)
  19. Surya R. Skoring Prognosis Tetanus Generalisata pada Pasien Dewasa. Cermin Dunia Kedokt. 2016;43(3):199-203
  20. Blencowe H, Lawn J, Vandelaer J, Roper M, Cousens S. Tetanus toxoid immunization to reduce mortality from neonatal tetanus. Int J Epidemiol. 2010; 39: 102–9
  21. Thwaites CL, Yen LM, Glover C, et al. Predicting the clinical outcome of tetanus: The tetanus severity score. Trop Med Int Heal. 2006;11(3):279-287
  22. Center of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Tetanus. 2014. http://198.246.98.21/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/pink-chapters.htm
  23. Lisboa T, Ho Y-L, Henriques Filho GT, et al. Guidelines for the management of accidental tetanus in adult patients. Rev Bras Ter intensiva. 2011;23(4):394-409
  24. Komang N, Laksmi S. Penatalaksanaan Tetanus. Contin Prof Dev. 2014;41(11):823-827
  25. Somia IKA. Management of tetanus complication. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2018;125(1)
  26. Lisboa T, Ho Y-L, Henriques Filho GT, et al. Guidelines for the management of accidental tetanus in adult patients. Rev Bras Ter intensiva. 2011;23(4):394-409
  27. Beeching NJ, Crowcroft N. Tetanus in injecting drug users. BMJ 2005; 330: 208–09
  28. Mahieu R, Reydel T, Maamar A, Tadié JM, Jamet A, Thille AW, Chudeau N, et.all. Admission of tetanus patients to the ICU: a retrospective multicentre study. Ann Intensive Care. 2017 Nov 7;7(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s13613-017-0333-y.PMID:29116572;PMCID:PMC5676569
  29. Nakajima M, Aso S, Matsui H, Fushimi K, Yasunaga H. Clinical features and outcomes of tetanus: analysis using a national inpatient database in Japan. J Crit Care 2018; 44: 388–91
  30. Brauner JS, Vieira SR, Bleck TP. Changes in severe accidental tetanus mortality in the ICU during two decades in Brazil. Intensive Care Med. 2002 Jul;28(7):930-5. doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1332-4.Epub2002May28.PMID:12122532
  31. Olum S, Eyul J, Lukwiya DO, Scolding N. Tetanus in a rural low-income intensive care unit setting. Brain Commun. 2021 Feb 16;3(1):fcab013. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcab013.PMID:33824951;PMCID:PMC8010432
  32. Dalal S, Samuelson J, Reed J, Yakubu A, Ncube B, Baggaley R. Tetanus disease and deaths in men reveal need for vaccination.Bull World Health Organ 2016; 94: 613–21
  33. Yen LM, Thwaites CL. Tetanus. Lancet. 2019 Apr 20;393(10181):1657-1668. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)33131-3.Epub2019Mar29.Erratumin:Lancet.2019Apr27;393(10182):1698.PMID:30935736
  34. Prawira, T. B. A. A., Witari, N. P., & Tini, K. (2018). Faktor–faktor yang berhubungan dengan luaran klinis pasien tetanus di RSUP Sanglah pada bulan Januari 2018–Oktober 2019. Metode, 2019

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.