BibTex Citation Data :
@article{JIRUD13526, author = {Fadhil Alghifari and Tri Utomo and Sheiffi Puspapertiwi}, title = {16. ANALISIS FAKTOR-FAKTOR PENGHAMBAT RATIFIKASI PORT STATE MEASURES AGREEMENT OLEH INDONESIA PERIODE 2009-2014}, journal = {Journal of International Relations Diponegoro}, volume = {2}, number = {4}, year = {2016}, keywords = {Port State Measures Agreement 2009, IUU fishing, Indonesia, Realism, integrated theory of international law}, abstract = {Indonesia, the world's largest archipelago, is known for its rich marine biodiversity and resources. The vast area, however, is difficult to monitor, which give rise to illegal activities. IUU fishing costs the country 30 trillion rupiah annually. Indonesia remains committed to completely eradicate illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing activities through international forum such as FAO. FAO's Port State Measures Agreement (PSMA) 2009 is a testament of commitment from the international community in addressing IUU fishing by strengthening the role of state port. However, five years after the inception of the Agreement, Indonesia's effort in commiting and complying with the Agreement were hampered by several factors. This study is aimed to explain the obstacles faced by Indonesia in the process of PSMA’s ratification. Therefore, it enables the country to conduct unilateral measure in fighting IUU fishing namely the “vessel drowning” policy with its current capabilities, available resources, and national interest. These two premises contribute to the slow process of PSMA’s ratification. This research utilized descriptiveanalytical method in attempt to answer the research question. Based on wide range data, study cases, and the theoretical framework, this study found that the use of Realism paradigm and Oona Hathaway’s integrated theory of International Law could best explain the hindrances faced by Indonesia in fulfiling the requirements of PSMA 2009, which hinders the progress of its ratification. This suggests that Indonesian government would serve its very best interest solely for the state and its survival in deterring, preventing, and eliminating IUU fishing. Thus, it sets aside the state’s desire and importance in complying and committing to international norms.}, issn = {3063-2684}, pages = {143--152} doi = {10.14710/jirud.v2i4.13526}, url = {https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/jihi/article/view/13526} }
Refworks Citation Data :
Article Metrics:
Last update: