skip to main content

Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Journal of International Relations Diponegoro publishes articles on contemporary transnational crimes from a variety of methodologies and approaches. The journal was originally established to encourage scholarly publications by students from International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro. JIRUD will be pubished twice a year May and November. 

Journal of International Relations Diponegoro seeks original manuscripts that provide theoretically informed empirical analyses of issues in international relations, as well as original theoretical or conceptual analyses. The journal represents no particular school or approach, nor is it restricted to any particular methodology. Instead, it seeks to foster an awareness of methodological and epistemological questions in the study of International Relations, and to reflect research and developments of a conceptual, normative and empirical nature in all the major sub-areas of the field. 

Journal of International Relations Diponegoro publishes research, development and review articles in social and political fields with the following scope:

1. Transnational Crime

2. International Crime

3. Security Studies

4. Globalization & Transnationalism

5. Humanitarianism

6. Foreign Policy

7. International Politics

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions
Checked Indexed
Checked Peer Reviewed

 

Peer Review Process / Policy

The Journal of International Relations Diponegoro (JIRUD) publishes peer reviewed content across the whole of International Relations, especially on issues of transnational crime. The practice of peer review is an indispensable process to ensure that the research published inside the journal is in accord with scholarly, scientific and editorial standards.

JIRUD employs double-blind peer review for its editorial decisions. Manuscripts will receive two independent reviewers, selected from our board according to subject expertise, who will then proceed to ensure that the manuscript accords with the journal’s standards. After passing through an iteration of the peer review process, the manuscript is then reviewed by the editor and the editor-in-chief.

 

Publication Frequency

Journal of International Relations (JIRUD) is published biannually every June and December

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Publication Ethics and Allegations of Misconducts

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

Journal of International Relations Diponegoro (JIRUD) is a peer-reviewed journal published by Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro. This statement clarifies ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the chief editor, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewer­­­­­ and the publisher. This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed Journal of International Relations is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher and the society.

Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro as publisher of Journal of International Relations Dipoegoro takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, the Faculty of Social and Political Sciences Universitas Diponegoro and Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and necessary.

Allegations of Misconducts

Research misconduct means fabrication, falsification, citation manipulation, or plagiarism in producing, performing, or reviewing research and writing article by authors, or in reporting research results. When authors are found to have been involved with research misconduct or other serious irregularities involving articles that have been published in scientific journals, Editors have a responsibility to ensure the accuracy and integrity of the scientific record.

In cases of suspected misconduct, the Editors and Editorial Board will use the best practices of COPE to assist them to resolve the complaint and address the misconduct fairly. This will include an investigation of the allegation by the Editors. A submitted manuscript that is found to contain such misconduct will be rejected. In cases where a published paper is found to contain such misconduct, a retraction can be published and will be linked to the original article.

The first step involves determining the validity of the allegation and an assessment of whether the allegation is consistent with the definition of research misconduct. This initial step also involves determining whether the individuals alleging misconduct have relevant conflicts of interest. 

If scientific misconduct or the presence of other substantial research irregularities is a possibility, the allegations are shared with the corresponding author, who, on behalf of all of the coauthors, is requested to provide a detailed response. After the response is received and evaluated, additional review and involvement of experts (such as statistical reviewers) may be obtained. For cases in which it is unlikely that misconduct has occurred, clarifications, additional analyses, or both, published as letters to the editor, and often including a correction notice and correction to the published article are sufficient. 

Institutions are expected to conduct an appropriate and thorough investigation of allegations of scientific misconduct. Ultimately, authors, journals, and institutions have an important obligation to ensure the accuracy of the scientific record. By responding appropriately to concerns about scientific misconduct, and taking necessary actions based on evaluation of these concerns, such as corrections, retractions with replacement, and retractions, Journal of International Relations Diponegoro will continue to fulfill the responsibilities of ensuring the validity and integrity of the scientific record.

Publication decisions

The editor of the Journal of International Relations Diponegoro is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play

An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

  • Contribution to Editorial Decisions. Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.
  • Promptness. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
  • Confidentiality. Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
  • Standards of Objectivity. Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
  • Acknowledgement of Sources. Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
  • Disclosure and Conflict of Interest. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
  • Reporting standards. Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.
  • Data Access and Retention. Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.
  • Originality and Plagiarism. The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.
  • Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication. An author could in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication.
  • Acknowledgement of Sources. Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.
  • Authorship of the Paper. Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
  • Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects. If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.
  • Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest. All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
  • Fundamental errors in published works. When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

Duties of Authors

  • Reporting standards. Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.
  • Data Access and Retention. Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.
  • Originality and Plagiarism. The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.
  • Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication. An author could in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication.
  • Acknowledgement of Sources. Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.
  • Authorship of the Paper. Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
  • Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects. If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.
  • Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest. All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their

 

Free Article Processing Fee (APC)

This journal does not charge any submission fees, review fees, processing fees, or publication fees. All articles are published free of charge as part of the journal's commitment to promoting open and accessible scholarly communication.

 

Ethical Oversight

If the research involves confidential data, proprietary information, or sensitive business and marketing practices, authors must clearly explain the nature of the confidentiality and provide justification for any restrictions on data disclosure. Authors should also describe the measures taken to ensure that confidential information is securely protected, anonymized where necessary, and handled in accordance with relevant ethical and legal standards.

 

Revenue Stream

This journal operates under a Diamond Open Access model, meaning that neither authors nor readers are charged any fees for submission, review, processing, publication, or access to published articles. The journal does not generate revenue from Article Processing Charges (APC), subscriptions, or paywalls. The operational costs of the journal, including editorial management, peer-review administration, website maintenance, digital archiving, and publication services, are supported by the Department of International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, as part of its commitment to promoting accessible and equitable scholarly communication.

 

Advertising Policy

Journal of International Relations Diponegoro is not accepting advertising from any parties.

All advertisements and commercially sponsored publications are independent of editorial decisions. Journal of International Relations Diponegoro does not endorse any product or service marked as an advertisement or promoted by a sponsor in Journal of International Relations Diponegoro publications. Editorial content is not compromised by commercial or financial interests, or by any specific arrangements with advertising clients or sponsors. Journal of International Relations Diponegoro reserves the right to decline any type of advertising that is damaging to the brand of the journal or is inappropriate to the content held on the journal network. Advertisements may not be deceptive or misleading and must be verifiable. Advertisements should clearly identify the advertiser and the product or service being offered. The exaggerated or extravagantly worded copy will not be allowed. Advertisements will not be accepted if they appear to be indecent or offensive in either text or artwork, or if they relate to the content of a personal, racial, ethnic, sexual orientation, or religious nature. Advertisements will appear in the print or online version, depending on request. Readers can criticize the advertisement by sending it to the office.  For all inquiries, contact the Journal of International Relations Diponegoro editorial office by e-mail below: 

jirud@live.undip.ac.id

 

Direct Marketing Policy

The journal is committed to promoting published research ethically, transparently, and responsibly. All marketing and promotional activities are conducted to increase the visibility, accessibility, and impact of the journal while maintaining academic integrity and respecting the interests of authors, readers, reviewers, and other stakeholders.

Objectives: The journal's marketing activities aim to: increase awareness of the journal among researchers, academics, practitioners, and students; attract high-quality manuscript submissions; enhance the visibility and accessibility of published articles; expand readership and scholarly engagement within relevant academic communities.

Journal Website and Discoverability: The journal website serves as the primary platform for communicating information about the journal, including its aims and scope, editorial policies, publication ethics, editorial board, author guidelines, and published content. The website is designed to facilitate manuscript submission, peer review, and access to published research.

Search Engine Optimization (SEO): The journal employs ethical search engine optimization practices to improve the discoverability of its website and published articles through major search engines. Metadata, keywords, article titles, abstracts, and website content are optimized to ensure that published research can be easily found and accessed by relevant audiences.

Social Media and Academic Networks: The journal may use social media platforms and academic networking channels to disseminate newly published articles, announce calls for papers, and share journal-related updates. These activities aim to increase research visibility and foster scholarly communication and collaboration.

Ethical Marketing Practices: The journal does not engage in deceptive, misleading, or aggressive marketing practices. Promotional activities are conducted in a professional manner and comply with accepted standards of scholarly publishing. The journal does not distribute unsolicited bulk communications (spam) and ensures that all promotional materials accurately represent the journal's scope, policies, editorial processes, and publication standards.

 

The Use of AI and Plagiarism Policy

The Use of AI 

The journal permits the responsible use of artificial intelligence (AI) tools for language editing, grammar checking, and manuscript preparation support. However, AI tools cannot be listed as authors because they cannot assume responsibility for the accuracy, integrity, and originality of scholarly work. Authors who use AI-assisted technologies must disclose their use in the manuscript. Authors remain fully responsible for all content submitted to the journal, including the accuracy of information, proper citation of sources, and compliance with publication ethics.

Plagiarism Policy

The journal maintains a strict policy against plagiarism in all its forms, including direct plagiarism, self-plagiarism, duplicate publication, data fabrication, data falsification, and inappropriate citation practices. All submitted manuscripts are screened using Turnitin plagiarism detection software before entering the peer-review process. To be considered for review and publication, manuscripts must have a similarity index of no more than 20%, excluding references, properly quoted text, and standard methodological descriptions.

Manuscripts exceeding the acceptable similarity threshold may be returned to the authors for revision or rejected at the discretion of the editorial team. Authors are responsible for ensuring that all submitted work is original and that all sources are appropriately cited and acknowledged.