skip to main content

ACADEMIC PROCRASTINATION REVIEWED FROM SEX DISTINCTION ON KEMENKES POLYTECHNIC STUDENT SEMARANG

Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Published: 16 Oct 2013.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Academic procrastination is delay which performed on the formal tasks related to academic assignments or academic performance. Procrastination which is done by the students is influenced by two factors, namely internal and external factors. Academic procrastination from the standpoint of gender isn’t escape from the factors that influence subjectdevelopment, i.e. student developments, covering the physical, psychological, social roles, gender roles, and religious developments.

This research aimed to determine differences in the level of academic procrastination based on gender male and female in the Kemenkes Health Polytechnic Semarang students. Subjects in this research amounted 60 male and 60 female students.

Sampling was done using proportional random sampling method. Data in this research were collected using psychological scales, i.e. scale of academic procrastination. Hypothesis test used T - test analysismethod.

Based on the analysis of data obtained from t – test, result of t value = -3.718 at a significance level of 0.00 (p < 0.05). Based on the meanof difference level of academic procrastinationshowed the mean value of female students was 53.38 and male was 58.98 that is in the range of 47.25 to 67.5. This indicated that the hypothesis can be accepted, namely that male students have higher level of academic procrastination compared with female students.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Academic Procrastination, Male and Female Students

Article Metrics:

  1. Ahmaini.D. (2010).(Skripsi Perbedaan Prokrastinasi Akademik Antara Mahasiswa Yang Aktif Dengan Tidak Aktif Dalam Organisasi Kemahasiswaan Pema Universitas Sumatera Utara.Diakses 17 Juni 2013
  2. Ferrari, J. R, Johnson, J.L.,& Mc Cown, W. G. 1995. Procrastination And Task Avoidance Theory, Research And Treatment. New York: Plenum Press
  3. Gufron, M. N. 2003. Hubungan Kontrol Diri dan Persepsi Remaja Terhadap Penerapan Disiplin Orangtua dengan Prokrastinasi Akademik.Tesis (tidak diterbitkan). Yogyakarta: Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Gadjah Mada
  4. Ignatius. 2011. Perbedaan Prokrastinasi Akademik pada Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Merdeka Malang Ditinjau Dari Jenis Kelamin. http://digilib.unmer.ac.id/gdl.php?mod=browse&op=read&id=ji ptunmerpp-gdl-ignatiusro-5904&q=Pendidikan. 4 Juli 2012
  5. Hurlock, E. B. 1999. Psikologi Perkembangan : Suatu Pendekatan Sepanjang Rentang Kehidupan (edisi 5), Jakarta: Erlangga
  6. Monks, F. J. 2002. Psikologi Perkembangan. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press
  7. Putra, N. A. 2010.Mahasiswa UMM, MATKOM 2010, Pendidikan dan Tujuannya. http://sagitarius.student.umm.ac.id/pengertian-pendidikandan-tujuan-pendidikan/html
  8. Rachmahana, R. S. 2001. Perilaku Prokrastinasi Akademik Pada Mahasiswa. Psikodimensia Kajian Ilmiah Psikologi, Vol. 2. No. 3 (132-137)
  9. Sarwono, S. W. 2011. Psikologi Remaja. Jakarta : Raja Grafindo Persada
  10. Undang-Undang RI. No. 20. 2003. SISDIKNAS. Bab II. Pasal 3.Tujuan Pendidikan Nasional. http://www.Pendidikan Nasional/development-studies/undangundang-RI.htm. Diakses pada 2 Juni 2013

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.