DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/empati.2022.35665

VALIDITAS ISI SKALA INTEGRITAS AKADEMIK DOSEN

Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Published: 1 Jun 2022.
Open Access Copyright 2022 Jurnal EMPATI
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Integritas akademik adalah kualitas individu-individu dalam lembaga pendidikan yang selalu diupayakan untuk menjadi semakin baik dari waktu ke waktu. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji validitas isi skala integritas akademik dosen. Item yang dikembangkan dalam penelitian ini menggunakan desain situational judgement test (SJT) yang terdiri dari sebuah skenario dan 4 opsi respon. Validasi isi dilakukan kepada indikator keperilakuan dan item yang disusun peneliti dengan batas nilai Aiken sebesar 0,8. Ahli yang dilibatkan dalam penelitian ini sejumlah 21 orang. Hasil analisis dengan Aiken’s V menunjukkan skala integritas akademik dosen yang dikembangkan dalam penelitian ini mempunyai validitas isi yang baik, dengan nilai V lebih dari 0,8 pada pengujian validitas isi indikator perilaku aspek integritas akademik maupun pengujian validitas isi pada 96 item skala integritas akademik.

 
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: dosen; skala integritas akademik; validitas isi

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Articles
Language : ID
Recent articles
VALIDITAS ISI SKALA INTEGRITAS AKADEMIK DOSEN HUBUNGAN ANTARA WORK ENGAGEMENT DENGAN WORK-FAMILY ENRICHMENT PADA POLISI WANITA DI MAPOLDA JAWA TENGAH KOTA SEMARANG KEMATANGAN EMOSI DAN KEPUASAN PERNIKAHAN PADA PEREMPUAN YANG MENIKAH MUDA DI KECAMATAN BANDAR KABUPATEN BATANG More recent articles
  1. Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficient for analyzing the relability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 131 - 142
  2. Azwar, S. (2013). Reliabilitas dan validitas. Yogya: Pustaka elajar
  3. Barnard, A., Schurink, W. & DeBeer, M. (2008). A conceptual framework of integrity: empirical research. South Africa Journal of Industrial Psychology, 34(2): 40 - 49
  4. Berry, C. M., Sackett, P. R. & Wiemann, S. (2007). A review of recent developments in integrity test research. Personnel Psychology, 60, 271– 301
  5. Creighton, P. & Scott, N. (2006). An introduction to situational judgement inventories. Selection and Development Review, 22, 3 - 6
  6. Delgado-Rico, E., Carretero-Dios, H., & Ruch, W. (2012). Content validity evidences in test development: An applied perspective. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology España, 12(3), 449-460
  7. DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development. SAGE
  8. Dugan, G. (2017). The practical application of test user knowledge and skills. In Cribb, B. (editor). Psychometric testing: critical perspective. Wiley Blackwell
  9. Dugar, J. W. (2011). The Role of integrity in individual and effective coorporate leadership. Journal of Academic and Bussiness Ethics. The Role of Integrity, page 1. Holy Family University
  10. Dunn, C. P. (2009). Integrity matters. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 5(2), 102-125
  11. Fishman, T. (2013). The Fundamental Values of Academic Integrity. International Center for Academic Integrity
  12. Guion, R. M. (1977). Content validity: the source of my discontent. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(1), 1 – 10
  13. Imran, A. M. & Nordin, M. S (2013). Predicting the underlying factors of academic dishonesty among undergraduates in public universities: a path analysis approach. Jounal of Academic Ethics, 11, 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805- 013-9183-x
  14. Jha, S., Singh, B., & Suresh, K. P. (2014). Consumer Perception Scale in Store Environment (CPS-SE) for measuring consumer buying behavior. IUP Journal of Marketing Management, 13(3), 48
  15. Keohane, N. O. (1999). The fundamental values of academic integrity. Oaktan Community College
  16. Liu, X. (2008). Research on the na and academic integrity. Critique of Anthropology, 28(3), 297–320
  17. Motowidlo, S. J., Hanson, M. A., & Crafts, J. L. (1997). Low-fidelity simulations.In Whetzel, D. L. & Wheaton, G. R. (Eds). Applied measurement methods in industrial psychology (pp. 241-260). Davies Black Publising
  18. Oliver, C., Shafiro, M., Bullard, P., & Thomas, J.C. (2012). Use of integrity tests may reduce workers’ compensation losses. Journal of Business Psychology. 27:115–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-011-9213-x
  19. Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C. & Schmidt, F. L. (1993). Comprehensive meta- analysis of integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 679-703
  20. Peterson, C. & Seligman, ME. (2004). Integrity. In Character Strengths and Virtues: A Handbook and Classification. Oxford University Press
  21. Randall, K., Bender, D. G., & Montgomery, D. M. (2007). Determining the opinions of health sciences students and faculty regarding academic integrity. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 3(2), 27-40
  22. Roberts, C. J. & Hai-Jew, S. (2009). Issues of academic integrity: an online course for students addressing academic dishonesty. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 5(2), 182 – 196

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.