DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/empati.2018.20244

HUBUNGAN ANTARA PSYCHOSOCIAL SAFETY CLIMATE DENGAN PROACTIVE WORK BEHAVIOR PADA KARYAWAN PT X JAKARTA

Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Received: 28 Mar 2018; Published: 26 Jun 2020.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui hubungan antara psychosocial safety climate dan proactive work behavior pada karyawan PT X Jakarta. Proactive work behavior adalah perilaku individu memulai inisiatif dalam mengambil kendali dan membawa perubahan, meliputi diri sendiri atau organisasi dalam konteks dan waktu tertentu. Sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah 60 karyawan PT X Jakarta. Teknik pengambilan sampel yang digunakan adalah convenience sampling. Alat ukur yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah Skala Psychosocial Safety Climate (30 aitem valid, α=0,956 dan Skala Proactive Work Behavior (22 aitem valid, α=0,891). Analisis regresi sederhana menunjukkan nilai rxy = 0,368 dan p=0,004 (p<0,05). Hasil ini menunjukkan ada hubungan positif yang signifikan antara psychosocial safety climate dengan proactive work behavior. Semakin positif psychosocial safety climate maka semakin tinggi pula proactive work behavior dan sebaliknya. Psychosocial safety climate memberikan sumbangan efektif sebesar 13,6% dalam mempengaruhi proactive work behavior, sedangkan sisanya sebesar 86,4% dipengaruhi oleh faktor lain yang tidak diungkap dalam penelitian ini.

 

 

 

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: pychosocial safety climate, proactive work behavior, karyawan asuransi

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Articles
Language : ID
Recent articles
HUBUNGAN ANTARA PERSEPSI BEBAN KERJA DENGAN STRESS KERJA PADA AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLER DI PERUM LPPNPI AIRNAV INDONESIA CABANG MADYA SURABAYA HUBUNGAN ANTARA PENYESUAIAN DIRI DENGAN MOTIVASI BELAJAR PADA SISWA KELAS X DI SMA NEGERI 8 PURWOREJO HUBUNGAN ANTARA IKLIM ORGANISASI DENGAN PERILAKU INOVATIF PADA KARYAWAN FINAL ASSAY DIVISI PRODUKSI PT. HARTONO ISTANA TEKNOLOGI SAYUNG DEMAK More recent articles
  1. Belschak, F., & Hartog, D. (2010). Being proactive at work – blessing or bane?. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 23(11), 886-889
  2. Bindl, U., & Parker, S. (2010). Proactive work behavior: Forward-thinking and change-oriented action in organizations. In S. Zedeck (Ed.) APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Vol 2. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
  3. Bond, S., Tuckey, M.R., & Dollard, M.F., (2010). Psychological safety climate, workplave bullying and symptoms of posttraumatic stress. Organization Development Journal. 28 (1), 37-56
  4. Cermati. (2016, 1 Mei). Perkembangan asuransi di Indonesia. Diunduh dari https://www.cermati.com/artikel/perkembangan-perusahaan-asuransi-diindonesia
  5. Clarke, S., Probst, T., Guldenmund, F., & Passmore, J. (2016). The wiley blackwell handbook of the psychology of occupational safety and workplace health. Retrieved from www.wiley.com/wiley-blackwell
  6. David, K., & Newstrom, M. (2003). Perilaku dalam organisasi. Jakarta: Erlangga
  7. Dollard, M. F., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). Psychosocial safety climate as a precursor to conducive work environments, psychological health problems, and employee engagement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(3), 579–599. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909X470690
  8. Dollard, M. F., & Karasek, R. A. (2010). Building psychosocial safety climate: Evalution of a socially coordinated PAR risk management stress prevention study. Contemporary Occupational Health Psychology. USA: John Wiley & Sons Ltd
  9. Dollard, M. F., Tuckey, M. R., & Dormann, C. (2012). Psychosocial safety climate moderates the job demand-resource interaction in predicting workgroup distress. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 45, 694–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.09.042
  10. Fathanah, S & Indrawati, E. (2017). Intensi proaktif ditinjau dari iklim organisasi pada karyawan televisi kampus universitas dian nuswantoro semarang. Skripsi Psikologi
  11. Fay, D., & Sonnentag, S. (2012). Within-person fluctuations of proactive behavior: How affect and experienced competence regulate work behavior. Human Performance, 25(1), 2–93
  12. Grant, A. M., & Ashford, S. J. (2008). The dynamics of proactivity at work. Research in Organizational Behavior. 28, 3-34. Doi: 10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.002
  13. Grant, A., Parker, S., & Collins, C. (2009). Getting credit for proactive behavior: Supervisor reactions depend on what you value and how you feel. Personel Psychology. 62(1), 31-35
  14. Nurofi, A. (2014). Meningkatkan perilaku proaktif karyawan melalui peran pimpinan dan sistem kontrol. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen dan Akuntansi Terapan. 5(1), 84-91
  15. Parker, S. K., & Collins, C. (2010). Taking Stock: Integrating and differentiating multiple proactive behaviors. Journal of Management. 36(3), 633-662
  16. Parker, S. K., Williams, H. M., & Turner, N. (2006). Modeling the antecendents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology. 91(3), 636-52. Doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.636
  17. Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature. Journal of applied psychology. 87(4), 698
  18. Schaufeli, W., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi-sample study. Journal of Organization Behavior. Vol 34, 1-15
  19. Siregar, Syofian. (2017). Statistik Parametrik untuk Penelitian Kuantitatif. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
  20. Songstad, N. G., Rekdal, O. B., Massay, D. A., & Blystad, A. (2011) Perceived unfairness in working conditions: the case of public health services in Tanzania. BMC health service research. 11(1), 34
  21. Strauss, K., & Parker, S. K. (2014). Effective and sustained proactivity in the workplace: A self-determination theory perspective. In M.Gagne (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of work engagement, motivation, and self-determination theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.