skip to main content

Evaluasi Program Perumahan Swadaya di Kabupaten Boyolali

*Utari Ardiyanti  -  Departemen Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota Fakultas Teknik Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Widjonarko Widjonarko  -  Departemen Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota Fakultas Teknik Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract
The number of uninhabitable housing is one of the main issues in Indonesia. Approximately 13.5 million backlog in Indonesia in which 3.4 million units are uninhabitable houses (Ministry of PUPR, 2015). In an effort to accelerate the realization of the ideals of society so that each family occupying the house livable in healthy neighborhoods with community involvement, it is necessary to the development of self-supporting housing. Starting from the concept of self-supporting housing idea as an alternative for the provision of housing development for low-income people in Boyolali, it needs to be replicated on the effectiveness of the implementation of self- supporting housing program in the field whether it is still appropriate as an alternative towards providing housing to community empowerment. This study aims to determine the success and effectiveness of the implementation of self-supporting housing program in Boyolali.The method used in this research is quantitative. Data collection techniques using observation, questionnaires with sampling technique is purposive sampling and using secondary data. The analysis used is descriptive analysis.Based on the research that has been done that the implementation of self-supporting housing program in Boyolali less successful in establishing appropriate housing, with the implementation of the program is less effective because the average percentage yield 45.63%. Such conditions can be seen from the aspect: Inaccuracy time reduction in funds, the recipient experienced a shortage of funds, lack of understanding by the recipient, the village chief task mismatch, no socialization and proposals by the community and less on target. Self- supporting housing program for the benefit of beneficiaries, in terms of health has been able to reduce the number of diseases associated with home is not livable. But in economic terms have not been able to significantly increase incomes
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: evaluation, self-supporting

Article Metrics:

  1. Bamberger, M., & Hewitt, E. (1986). Monitoring and evaluating urban development programs: a handbook for program managers and researchers. The World Bank
  2. Bredenoord, J. (2009). The people”s struggle for affordable living space. The role of (assisted) self-help housing from 1950–2010 and beyond
  3. Budiyanti, T. (2003). Evaluasi Rencana Teknik Ruang Kawasan Khusus Permukiman Flamboyan Bawah Danau Seha Kota Palangkaraya. Tesis S-2. Program Studi Magister Teknik Pembangunna Kota, Program Pascasarjana Universitas Diponegoro Semarang
  4. Carolina, A., Loesida, R., & Suratman, S. (2014). ANALISIS PELAKSANAAN BANTUAN STIMULAN PERUMAHAN SWADAYA (BSPS) PROGRAM BEDAH RUMAH DI KELURAHAN KANDANG KECAMATAN KAMPUNG MELAYU (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Bengkulu)
  5. Conyers, D. (1994). Perencanaan sosial di dunia ketiga: suatu pengantar. Gadjah Mada University Press
  6. Harris, R. A Double Irony: the Originality and Influence of John F.C Turner. Habitat International, 27(2), 245- 269, 2003
  7. Heripoerwanto, E. (2012). Perencanaan Bantuan Stimulan Perumahan Swadaya. Bimbingan Teknis Dekonsentrasi Bidang Perumahan dan Kawasan Permukiman
  8. Indonesia, K. N. P. R. R. (2013). Peraturan Menteri Negara Perumahan Rakyat Nomor: 06. PERMEN/M/2013 tentang Pedoman Pelaksanaan Bantuan Stimulan Perumahan Swadaya. Jakarta: Kementerian Negara Perumahan Rakyat Republik Indonesia
  9. Indonesia, R. (2002). Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Sekretariat Jenderal MPR RI
  10. Kementerian PUPR Siap Lanjutkan Program Bedah Rumah. Diunduh Senin, 20 April 2015. http://pu.go.id
  11. Juniarko, O. (2012). Evaluasi Sistem Bantuan Stimulan Pembiayaan Perumahan Swadaya Di Kabupaten Malang. Tesis S-2. Program Magister Teknik Sipil Minat Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota Fakultas Teknik Universitas Brawijaya Malang
  12. Kurniasih, S. (2007). Usaha Perbaikan Permukiman Kumuh Di Petukangan Utara-Jakarta Selatan. Jakarta. Universitas Budi Luhur
  13. Listya, H. (2010). Pengaruh Partisipasi Masyarakat terhadap Tingkat Keberhasilan Proyek Pemberdayaan Masyarakat di Kabupaten Banyuwangi. Tesis S-2. Surabaya: Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
  14. Lexsatyaji, A. R. 2010. Karakteristik rumah swadaya ditinjau dari pola produksi rumah di Kota Semarang. Skripsi S-1. Program Studi Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota Fakultas Teknik Universitas Diponegoro
  15. Mungkasa, O. 2012. Perumahan Swadaya Konsep, Pembelajaran dan Praktek Unggulan. (15 Mei 2015) www.academia.edu/2641557/perumahan_swadaya_konsep_pembelajaran_dan_praktek_unggulan
  16. No, U. U. (1). Tahun 2011 tentang Perumahan dan Permukiman
  17. Ntema, L. J. (2011). Self-help housing in South Africa: Paradigms, policy and practice (Doctoral dissertation, University of the Free State)
  18. Panudju, B. (1999). Pengadaan Perumahan Kota dengan Peran Serta Masyarakat Berpenghasilan Rendah. Alumni
  19. Sugito. 2002. Studi Evaluasi Program Pembangunan Prasarana Pendukung Desa Tertinggal Studi Kasus di Kabupaten Grobogan. Tesis S-2. Program Studi Magister Ilmu Administrasi, Program Pascasarjana Universitas Diponegoro Semarang
  20. Sujarweni, W. 2014. Metodologi Penelitian. Yogyakarta: PT Pustaka Baru
  21. Tanpa Angka Tahun. Perilaku Hidup Bersih dan Sehat Berbasis Lingkungan. Diunduh Rabu, 5 Agustus 2015. http://new.pamsimas.org
  22. Turner, J. F., & Fichter, R. (Eds.). (1972). Freedom to build: dweller control of the housing process. Macmillan
  23. Umar, H. (2002). Evaluasi kinerja perusahaan. Gramedia Pustaka Utama
  24. Wardani, F. N. H. K. 2010. Tingkat Keberhasilan Implementasi Program bantuan Stimulan Pembangunan Perumahan Swadaya dan peningkatan Kualitas Perumahan di Kabupaten Sragen. Skripsi S-1. Program Studi Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota Jurusan Arsitektur Fakultas Teknik Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta
  25. William, N. D. (2003). Pengantar Analisis Kebijakan Publik. Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta
  26. Wulandari, P. R. 2013. Analisis Partisipasi Masyarakat dan Kepemimpinan Terhadap Tingkat Keberhasilan Proyek Program Nasional Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (PNPM) Mandiri Perdesaan di Kecamatan Gerokgak, Buleleng. Tesis S-2. Program Magister Program Studi Ilmu Ekonomi Program Pascasarjana Universitas Udayana Denpasar
  27. Yudohusodo, S. (1991). Rumah untuk seluruh rakyat. INKOPPOL, Unit Percetakan Bharakerta
  28. Zhang, L., Zhao, S.X.B. and Tian, J.P. Self-Help in Housing and Chengzhongcun in China’s Urbanisation. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27(4), 912-937, 2003

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.