skip to main content

Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Program Pertanian Perkotaan pada Penghuni Rumah Susun Marunda, Jakarta Utara

*Riska Rahma Arriani  -  Departemen Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota Fakultas Teknik Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Mardwi Rahdriawan  -  Departemen Perencanaa Wilayah dan Kota Fakultas Teknik Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

The Urban Farming Program in the Rusun Marunda was initiated by the government and managed by 50 farmers in 2014. The goals of the urban farming program are to develop green space, to provide the food access system and to empower the  community. However, the number of farmers who participate in Urban Farming Program continues to decrease as in 2019 only remains 5 (five) farmers. This research aims to find out the decreasing reasons for ommunity participation in Urban Farming Program. The method of this research uses the qualitative approach with purposive sampling. This study found that the reasons for farmers’ participation in Urban Farming Program are driven by two different motivations; psychological-Altruism motivation and economic-egoism motivation. Farmers with psychology-Altruism motivation are participating due to fulfill self-satisfaction while farmers with economic motivation are participating due to gain the financial benefits from Urban Farming Program. The results of the study found out that the decreasing number in community participation is caused by the obstacles in farming which demotivating farmers to participate in the Urban Farming Program. As a result, Farmers with economic-egoism motivation refuse to participate while farmers with psychological motivation still participate in Urban Farming Program.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Demotivating, Community Participation, Urban Farming Program

Article Metrics:

  1. Batson, C. D. (1994). Why Act For The Public Good? Four answers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 603–610
  2. Batson, C. D., Ahmad, N., & Tsang, J.-A. (2002). Four Motives for Community Involvement. Journal of Social Issues, 58(3), 429–445. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00269
  3. Battersby, J., & Marshak, M. (2013). Growing Communities: Integrating the Social and Economic Benefits of Urban Agriculture in Cape Town. Urban Forum, 24(4), 447–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-013-9193-1
  4. Bellows, A. C., State, T., Community, S., Trust, L., Smit, J., & Urban, M. C. P. T. (2003). Health Benefits of Urban Agriculture. Agriculture, (January)
  5. Browne, E. (2014). Benefits of urbanisation in Asia. Governance. Social Development. Humanitarian. Conflict, 1–9. Retrieved from www.gsdrc.org
  6. Buic, M., & Cunk, K. (2017). Approaching Urban Agriculture as a Social Innovation: Guidlines for the Development and Implementation of an Action Plan. Koper: The European Union Funds
  7. FAO. (2008). Urban Agriculture For Sustainable Poverty Alleviation and Food Security. October, (October), 1–83
  8. Foundation, Vitalyst Health (2017). Urban Farming. In Field to Palette. https://doi.org/10.1201/b22355-2
  9. Harackiewicz, J. M., & Hulleman, C. S. (2010). The Importance of Interest: The Role of Achievement Goals and Task Values in Promoting the Development of Interest. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(1), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00207.x
  10. Heather, K. L. (2012). The Environmental Benefits of Urban Agriculture on Unused, Impermeable and Semi-Permeable Spaces in Major Cities With a Focus on Philadelphia , PA. Environmental Studies, 1–55. Retrieved from http://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1044&context=mes_capstones
  11. Huraerah, A. (2011). Pengorganisasian dan Pengembangan Masyarakat: Model dan Strategi Pengembangan berbasis Kerakyatan. Bandung: Humaniora
  12. Kompas. (2018). Dulu Bisa Raup Rp 15 Juta Per Bulan, Pertanian di Rusun Marunda Kini Lesu. Retrieved from https://megapolitan.kompas.com/read/2018/03/26/17302021/dulu-bisa-raup-rp-15-juta-per-bulan-pertanian-di-rusun-marunda-kini-lesu
  13. Mardikanto, T., & Soebiato, P. (2012). Pemberdayaan Masyarakat dalam Perspektif Kebijakan Publik. Bandung: Alfa Beta
  14. Matuschke, I., & Kohler, S. (2014). Rapid Urbanization and Food Security. World Risk Report 2014, (SEPTEMBER 2014), in preparation
  15. Pardee, R. L. (1990). Motivation Theories of Maslow, Herzberg, McGregor & McClelland. A Literature Review of Selected Theories Dealing. Educational Resources Information Centre (ERIC), 24. https://doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v4n2p2
  16. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (Fourth Edi). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publication
  17. United Nations. (2014). Department of economic and social affairs of the united nations population division (UNPD) (2014). World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision, Highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/352). In New York, United. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2005.12.9
  18. UNPAN. (2013). UN Public Administration Glossary. Retrieved July 13, 2018, from http://www.unpan.org/Directories/UNPublicAdministrationGlossary/tabid/928/language/en-US/Default.aspx

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.