skip to main content

ESTIMASI ASPEK FISIK MANUSIA DITINJAU DARI DIMENSI TELAPAK KAKI STATIS UNTUK KEBUTUHAN FORENSIK

*Fazjri Musbahul Umam  -  Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universitas Diponegoro, Jl. Prof. Sudarto, SH, Tembalang, Semarang, Indonesia 50275, Indonesia
Dwi Basuki Wibowo  -  Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universitas Diponegoro, Jl. Prof. Sudarto, SH, Tembalang, Semarang, Indonesia 50275, Indonesia
Shofwan Bahar  -  Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universitas Diponegoro, Jl. Prof. Sudarto, SH, Tembalang, Semarang, Indonesia 50275, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

Dalam bidang forensik, telapak kaki memiliki berbagai informasi yang dapat dijadikan sebagai sarana untuk mengidentifikasi manusia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengestimasi tinggi badan, berat badan, dan indeks massa tubuh (IMT) pada remaja usia 18–24 tahun berdasarkan dimensi telapak kaki menggunakan metode digital footprint dengan validasi wet foot test. Data diperoleh dari 166 subjek (151 pria dan 15 wanita) yang diukur panjang dan lebar telapak kaki, tinggi, serta berat badan. Analisis regresi linier digunakan untuk mengetahui korelasi dan membangun persamaan estimasi, yang kemudian dibandingkan dengan hasil penelitian terdahulu. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa panjang kaki memiliki korelasi kuat dengan tinggi badan (r = 0,71) dengan tingkat kesalahan estimasi sebesar 2,64%. Lebar kaki berkorelasi cukup dengan berat badan (r = 0,57; %SEE = 17,3%) dan IMT (r = 0,53; %SEE = 16,9%). Kesimpulannya, panjang kaki dapat dijadikan prediktor akurat untuk estimasi tinggi badan, sedangkan estimasi berat badan dan IMT memerlukan variabel tambahan untuk meningkatkan akurasi, mengingat sifat regresi yang kontekstual terhadap populasi.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: digital footprint; forensik; indeks massa tubuh (imt); telapak kaki; tinggi badan
  1. D. Atamturk, “Estimation of Sex from the Dimensions of Foot, Footprints, and Shoe,” Anthropologischer Anzeiger, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 21–29, Mar. 2010, doi: https://doi.org/10.1127/0003-5548/2010/0026
  2. H. van Beek, C. van den Pol, and J. van der Weerd, “Criminalistic zoom levels: Unravelling the hierarchy of forensic traces,” Forensic Science International, vol. 372, p. 112498, Jul. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2025.112498
  3. C. Cano-Trujillo, C. García-Ruiz, F. E. Ortega-Ojeda, F. Romolo, and G. Montalvo, “Forensic analysis of biological fluid stains on substrates by spectroscopic approaches and chemometrics: A review,” Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 1282, p. 341841, Nov. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2023.341841
  4. N. Hemy, A. Flavel, N.-I. Ishak, and D. Franklin, “Estimation of stature using anthropometry of feet and footprints in a Western Australian population,” Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 435–441, Jul. 2013, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2012.12.008
  5. T. Kanchan, K. Krishan, D. Geriani, and I. S. Khan, “Estimation of stature from the width of static footprints—Insight into an Indian model,” The Foot, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 136–139, Dec. 2013, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foot.2013.10.015
  6. K. Krishan, T. Kanchan, N. Passi, and J. A. DiMaggio, “Sexual dimorphism in foot length ratios among North Indian adolescents,” Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, vol. 36, pp. 96–101, Nov. 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2015.09.007
  7. R. Mukhra, K. Krishan, and T. Kanchan, “Bare footprint metric analysis methods for comparison and identification in forensic examinations: A review of literature,” Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 101–112, Aug. 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2018.05.006
  8. R. Mukhra, K. Krishan, M. S. Nirenberg, E. Ansert, and T. Kanchan, “Comparative analysis of static and dynamic bare footprint dimensions in a north Indian population,” Forensic Science International, vol. 308, p. 110169, Mar. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110169
  9. S. A. Mussabekova, X. E. Mkhitaryan, and K. R. Abdikadirova, “DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN KAZAKHSTAN: FORENSIC-MEDICAL AND MEDICAL-SOCIAL ASPECTS,” Forensic science international. Reports, pp. 100356–100356, Jan. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsir.2024.100356
  10. S. Palla and S Anitha, “Anthropometric Examination of Footprints in South Indian Population for Sex Estimation,” Forensic Science International: Reports, pp. 100354–100354, Jan. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsir.2024.100354
  11. C. B. Ruff et al., “Body mass estimation from footprint size in hominins,” Journal of Human Evolution, vol. 156, p. 102997, Jul. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2021.102997
  12. E. C. Silva et al., “3D facial anthropometry of Chilean workers and migrants: Cross-country comparisons and insights for PPE design,” Applied Ergonomics, vol. 128, pp. 104551–104551, May 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104551
  13. S. Smith-Escudero, A. Dautartas, J. R. Goliath, and S. P. Lambert, “Chaos theory and its applications in forensic anthropology,” Forensic Science International: Synergy, vol. 10, p. 100587, Jun. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2025.100587
  14. K. Sun and Y. Luo, “A preliminary study on the stability of bare footprint linear measurements in four motion states,” Science & Justice, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 549–556, Aug. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2024.08.006

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.