BibTex Citation Data :
@article{JKM15565, author = {Maharani Purnama sari and Sri Nugraheni and Ronny Aruben}, title = {PENGARUH BUKU SAKU TERHADAP TINGKAT KECUKUPAN GIZI PADA REMAJA (Studi Di SMA Teuku Umar Semarang Tahun 2016)}, journal = {Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat}, volume = {5}, number = {1}, year = {2017}, keywords = {Nutrition Education Through Pocket Book, Nutritional Sciences, Nutritional adequacy levels.}, abstract = { Nutrition education through the pocketbook is one solution to convert knowledge of nutrition and nutritional adequacy levels in adolescents. The purpose of this study was to analyze the differences in nutrition knowledge and nutritional adequacy levels before and after nutrition education between the two groups. The study design quasy experiment with the design of non-randomized control group pretest-posttest design. The sample was 70 subjects (35 treatment group and 35 control group) with a purposive sampling techniques. Before being given booklets, each group was given exposure on the prevention of malnutrition and measurement of knowledge and level of initial nutritional adequacy. In the treatment group was given a pocket book and quiz whereas the control group did not. After that, each group performed measurements of knowledge and level of nutritional adequacy of the final. In this study using the paired t test, Wilcoxon signed rank test, Mann Whitney test, and independent t test. The results showed the treatment group increased nutritional knowledge level of 39.6%, while the control group decreased nutritional knowledge level of 17.1%. The treatment group decreased energy sufficiency level of 5.7%; protein sufficiency rate increased by 5.7%; sufficient levels of fat decreased by 5.7%. The control group increased energy sufficiency level of 5.7%; protein sufficiency rate increased by 5.9%; fat sufficiency level increased by 34.3%. There is a difference of knowledge between the two groups (p = 0.001). There is a difference in energy sufficiency level (p = 0.019), protein (p = 0.002), and fat (p = 0.001) between the two groups. It is concluded that there are differences in knowledge of nutrition and nutritional adequacy level (energy, protein, fat) between the two groups (p <0.05). }, issn = {2356-3346}, pages = {283--290} doi = {10.14710/jkm.v5i1.15565}, url = {https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/jkm/article/view/15565} }
Refworks Citation Data :
Nutrition education through the pocketbook is one solution to convert knowledge of nutrition and nutritional adequacy levels in adolescents. The purpose of this study was to analyze the differences in nutrition knowledge and nutritional adequacy levels before and after nutrition education between the two groups. The study design quasy experiment with the design of non-randomized control group pretest-posttest design. The sample was 70 subjects (35 treatment group and 35 control group) with a purposive sampling techniques. Before being given booklets, each group was given exposure on the prevention of malnutrition and measurement of knowledge and level of initial nutritional adequacy. In the treatment group was given a pocket book and quiz whereas the control group did not. After that, each group performed measurements of knowledge and level of nutritional adequacy of the final. In this study using the paired t test, Wilcoxon signed rank test, Mann Whitney test, and independent t test. The results showed the treatment group increased nutritional knowledge level of 39.6%, while the control group decreased nutritional knowledge level of 17.1%. The treatment group decreased energy sufficiency level of 5.7%; protein sufficiency rate increased by 5.7%; sufficient levels of fat decreased by 5.7%. The control group increased energy sufficiency level of 5.7%; protein sufficiency rate increased by 5.9%; fat sufficiency level increased by 34.3%. There is a difference of knowledge between the two groups (p = 0.001). There is a difference in energy sufficiency level (p = 0.019), protein (p = 0.002), and fat (p = 0.001) between the two groups. It is concluded that there are differences in knowledge of nutrition and nutritional adequacy level (energy, protein, fat) between the two groups (p <0.05).
Article Metrics:
Last update:
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat (JKM, p-ISSN: 2715-5617, e-ISSN:2356-3346) and Faculty of Public Health, Diponegoro University as the publisher of the journal. Copyright encompasses the rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms, and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.
JKM journal and Faculty of Public Health, Diponegoro University, the Editors and the Advisory Editorial Board make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in the JKM journal are the sole and exclusive responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.
The Copyright Transfer Form can be downloaded here: [Copyright Transfer Form JKM journal]The copyright form should be signed originally and send to the Editorial Office in the form of original mail or scanned document to jkm@live.undip.ac.id.
Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat (e-ISSN: 2356-3346, p-ISSN: 2715-5617) is published by Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia, under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats
