Menilai Efektivitas Fogging Fokus Menggunakan ThermalFog Dan UltraLow Volume (ULV) dengan Insektisida Malathion dalam Pengendalian Vektor  Demam Berdarah (Studi Di Wilayah Kerja Puskesmas Tlogosari Wetan Kota Semarang)

Zefira Sausan Archiarafa; Ludfi Santoso; Martini Martini

doi:10.14710/jkm.v4i1.11789

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jkm.v4i1.11789

Menilai Efektivitas Fogging Fokus Menggunakan ThermalFog Dan UltraLow Volume (ULV) dengan Insektisida Malathion dalam Pengendalian Vektor Demam Berdarah (Studi Di Wilayah Kerja Puskesmas Tlogosari Wetan Kota Semarang)

*Zefira Sausan Archiarafa - , Indonesia

Ludfi Santoso - , Indonesia

Martini Martini - , Indonesia

Published: 2 Mar 2016.

BibTex Citation Data :

@article{JKM11789,
    author = {Zefira Archiarafa and Ludfi Santoso and Martini Martini},
    title = {Menilai Efektivitas Fogging Fokus Menggunakan ThermalFog Dan UltraLow Volume (ULV) dengan Insektisida Malathion dalam Pengendalian Vektor  Demam Berdarah (Studi Di Wilayah Kerja Puskesmas Tlogosari Wetan Kota Semarang)},
    journal = {Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat},
  volume = {4},
    number = {1},
    year = {2016},
    keywords = {Fogging focus, ULVportable and ThermalFog, assessing the effectiveness},
    abstract = {  All this time   fumigation has been often used as the principal method of controlling DHF in some countries over half of this decade,   but   the results are not so satisfy, as shown by an increase in the incidence of dengue in the same time. This study aimed to evaluate focus Fogging  us  ing  ThermalFog and ULVportable in dengue vector control. The method used is a quasi-experimental design with non-randomized control group pretest posttest design. Samples in this study are 25 houses in each application   area   of the whole house is in the application   area  . Analysis of data using different test Wilcoxon and Mc-Nemar. The results showed that there was no difference in HI, OI and the number of eggs between before Fogging with after    1st   Fogging and after   1st   Fogging with after   2nd   Fogging  on both   application   (p value> 0.05). On the application of ULVportable, p value before-after Fogging 1: HI = 0.063, OI = 0.774, and the amount of eggs = 0.649 while the p value after Fogging 1-after Fogging 2: HI = 1.000, OI = 0.289, and the amount of eggs = 0.358 , Then in ThermalFog, p value before-after Fogging 1: HI = 0.625, OI = 0.267, and the amount of eggs = 0.255 while the p value after Fogging 1-after Fogging 2: HI = 0.500, OI = 0.344, and the amount of eggs = 0.683  .  The author suggested the city health office to further tighten supervision and evaluation of Fogging and to   the public   that rely more eradication   of   mosquito   breeding plasce   than Fogging.    },
   issn = {2356-3346},   pages = {226--231}  doi = {10.14710/jkm.v4i1.11789},
    url = {https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/jkm/article/view/11789}
}

Citation Format:

Abstract

All this time fumigation has been often used as the principal method of controlling DHF in some countries over half of this decade, but the results are not so satisfy, as shown by an increase in the incidence of dengue in the same time. This study aimed to evaluate focus Fogging usingThermalFog and ULVportable in dengue vector control. The method used is a quasi-experimental design with non-randomized control group pretest posttest design. Samples in this study are 25 houses in each application area of the whole house is in the application area. Analysis of data using different test Wilcoxon and Mc-Nemar. The results showed that there was no difference in HI, OI and the number of eggs between before Fogging with after 1st Fogging and after 1st Fogging with after 2nd Fogging on both application (p value> 0.05). On the application of ULVportable, p value before-after Fogging 1: HI = 0.063, OI = 0.774, and the amount of eggs = 0.649 while the p value after Fogging 1-after Fogging 2: HI = 1.000, OI = 0.289, and the amount of eggs = 0.358 , Then in ThermalFog, p value before-after Fogging 1: HI = 0.625, OI = 0.267, and the amount of eggs = 0.255 while the p value after Fogging 1-after Fogging 2: HI = 0.500, OI = 0.344, and the amount of eggs = 0.683.The author suggested the city health office to further tighten supervision and evaluation of Fogging and to the public that rely more eradication of mosquito breeding plasce than Fogging.

Fulltext View|Download

Keywords: Fogging focus, ULVportable and ThermalFog, assessing the effectiveness

Article Metrics:

Article Info

Section: Epidemiologi dan Penyakit Tropik

In Vol 4, No 1 (2016): JANUARI

Recent articles

ANALISIS IMPLEMENTASI PENGINTEGRASIAN PELAYANAN KESEHATAN TRADISIONAL DI PUSKESMAS HALMAHERA KOTA SEMARANG FAKTOR PENYEBAB KEMATIAN BAYI DI WILAYAH KERJA PUSKESMAS NGOMBOL KABUAPTEN PURWOREJO (STUDI KASUS TAHUN 2015) HUBUNGAN BEBERAPA FAKTOR DETERMINAN DENGAN KUALITAS DATA ASUHAN KEPERAWATAN DI RUANG RAWAT INAP RUMAH SAKIT UMUM KOTA BEKASI TAHUN 2015 HUBUNGAN PENGETAHUAN DAN SIKAP DENGAN PERILAKU DETEKSI DINI PADA PENDERITA KANKER SERVIKS DI RSUP DR. KARIADI SEMARANG TAHUN 2015 Keanekaragaman Jenis Rayap Tanah dan Dampak Serangan Pada Bangunan Rumah di Perumahan Kawasan Mijen Kota Semarang GAMBARAN FAKTOR RISIKO PENINGKATAN TEKANAN DARAH PADA REMAJA USIA 12-14 TAHUN (Studi Pada Siswa SMP Islam Al Azhar 14 Semarang) PENGETAHUAN, SIKAP, DAN PRAKTIK DALAM PEMBERIAN ASI EKSKLUSIF DI WILAYAH KERJA PUSKESMAS REMBANG 2 DAN PUSKESMAS SARANG FAKTOR – FAKTOR YANG BERHUBUNGAN dengan USIA MENOPAUSE (Studi di Puskesmas Bangetayu Tahun 2015) ANALISIS KESIAPSIAGAAN RSUD dr. SOEDIRAN MANGUN SUMARSO WONOGIRI DALAM PENANGGULANGAN BENCANA PENERAPAN HAZARD IDENTIFICATION RISK ASSESSMENT AND RISK CONTROL (HIRARC) SEBAGAI PENGENDALIAN POTENSI KECELAKAAN KERJA DI BAGIAN PRODUKSI BODY BUS PT. X MAGELANG ANALISIS FAKTOR – FAKTOR RISIKO YANG MEMPENGARUHI TINGKAT KERACUNAN PESTISIDA PADA PETANI DI DESA JATI , KECAMATAN SAWANGAN, KABUPATEN MAGELANG, JAWA TENGAH FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI ANGKA KUMAN PADA PERALATAN MAKAN DI LAPAS WANITA KLAS IIA SEMARANG PERILAKU PENCARIAN PENGOBATAN PADA WANITA DENGAN IVA (INSPEKSI VISUAL DENGAN ASAM ASETAT) POSITIFDI PUSKESMAS HALMAHERA DAN PUSKESMAS KEDUNGMUNDU KOTA SEMARANG FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG BERHUBUNGAN DENGAN BUANG AIR BESAR DI JAMBAN DI DESA GUNUNGSARI KECAMATAN PULOSARI KABUPATEN PEMALANG More recent articles

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.

The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat (JKM, p-ISSN: 2715-5617, e-ISSN:2356-3346) and Faculty of Public Health, Diponegoro University as the publisher of the journal. Copyright encompasses the rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms, and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.

JKM journal and Faculty of Public Health, Diponegoro University, the Editors and the Advisory Editorial Board make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in the JKM journal are the sole and exclusive responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.

The Copyright Transfer Form can be downloaded here: [Copyright Transfer Form JKM journal]
The copyright form should be signed originally and send to the Editorial Office in the form of original mail or scanned document to jkm@live.undip.ac.id.