12. ANALISIS RESPON INDONESIA TERHADAP AUSTRALIA DALAM PERISTIWA PENCEMARAN LAUT KILANG MINYAK MONTARA TAHUN 2009

*Ghiebiel Fido Caliptra -  Program Studi Hubungan Internasional, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Hermini Susiatiningsih -  Program Studi Hubungan Internasional, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Andi Akhmad Basith Dir -  Program Studi Hubungan Internasional, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Published: 9 Sep 2016.
Open Access
Citation Format:
Article Info
Section: Articles
Full Text:
Statistics: 31 47
Abstract
Montara oil refinery marine pollution which comes from Australia enter Indonesia’s sea
and inflict disadvantage, that make Indonesia to seek compensation on Australia but not
succeeded. Indonesia and Australia ratified Memorendum of Understanding 1996 on
respond and preparedness marine pollution, but Australia did not use three paragraphs in
MoU 1996 when Montara marine pollution happened. Indonesia should seek compensation
be based on three paragraphs in MoU 1996 which did not use by Australia but Indonesia
not did it. This study tries to analize Indonesia respond’s which did not use MoU 1996 to
seek compensation on Australia. The research method which used to explain of Indonesia
respond’s is explanative analytical research and found the Indonesia repond’s which did
not use MoU 1996 to seek compensation on Australia is a form of compromise. The
compromise used by Indonesia to keep stability relations with Australia because both
country had a mutual relations.
Keywords
Indonesia and Australia’s action, relationship patterns, compromise, Montara marine pollution

Article Metrics: