skip to main content

VALUE AT RISK (VAR) METODE DELTA-NORMAL BERDASARKAN DURASI UNTUK UKURAN RISIKO OBLIGASI PEMERINTAH

*Setiani Setiani  -  Departemen Statistika, Fakultas Sains dan Matematika, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Di Asih I Maruddani  -  Departemen Statistika, Fakultas Sains dan Matematika, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Dwi Ispriyanti  -  Departemen Statistika, Fakultas Sains dan Matematika, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright 2021 Jurnal Gaussian under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

A bond is one of invesment instrument that is basically a debt instrument. In investing, beside getting profit there is also the risk of loss. The risk of loss is unavoidable but it can be manageable. The concept of a portfolio in investing is to minimize risk. Value at Risk (VaR) is a method used to measure risk where VaR states the estimated amount of the maximum loss that will be obtained at a certain level of confidence during a certain period in normal market conditions. In this article the risk of bonds FR0053, FR0056, FR0059, FR0061 and portfolio combinations calculated with VaR value of the Delta-Normal method are calculated based on the duration of the bonds. Normality test of the bond market price return is required before calculating VaR. The results obtained if it is assumed that the bonds are purchased at a price of 100 and with a confidence level of 95%, then the portfolio that has the smallest risk is the Bond portfolio of FR0059 and FR0061 with a VaR value  Rp 21,436 (Trillions).

 

 

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Bond; Duration; Value at Risk; Delta-Normal Method; Portfolio

Article Metrics:

  1. Fauziah, N. 2012. Risiko Kredit Portofolio Obligasi dengan Credit Metrics dan Optimalisasi Portofolio dengan Metode Mean Variance Efficient Portofolio (MVEP). Gaussian. sVol 1 (1): 159-168
  2. Ijtihadi, A.F. 2010. Pengukuran Value at Risk pada Portofolio Sukuk dan Obligasi. Tesis. Universitas Indonesia
  3. Jorion, P. 2007. Value at Risk : The New Benchmark for Managing Financial Risk, Third Edition. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc
  4. Manurung, A.H. 2007. Pengelolaan Portofolio Obligasi. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo
  5. Manurung, A.H. 2015. Materi Pokok Teori Portofolio dan Analisis Investasi (Edisi ke-2. Cetakan ke-1). Tangerang Selatan: Universitas Terbuka
  6. Maruddani, D.A.I. dan Hoyyi, A. 2017. Perbandingan Sensitivitas Harga Obligasi Berdasarkan Durasi Macaulay dan Durasi Eksponensial Dengan Pengaruh Konveksitas (Studi Empiris pada data Obligasi Korporasi Indonesia yang Terbit Tahun 2015). Media Statistika. Vol 10 (1): 25-36
  7. Maruddani, D.A.I. 2019. Value at Risk untuk Pengukuran Risiko Investasi Saham. Ponorogo: WADE Group
  8. Obadovic, M., dkk. 2016. Assessing the Accurasy of Delta-Normal VaR Evaluation for Serbian Goverment Bond Portofolio. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja. Vol 29 (1):475-484
  9. Rahardjo, S. 2003. Panduan Investasi Obligasi. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama
  10. Somantri, A. 2013. Pengukuran Risiko Kredit Obligasi Korporasi dengan Credit Valuet at Risk (CVaR) dan Optimalisasi Portofolio Menggunakan Metode Mean Variance Efficient Portofolio (MVEP). Gaussian. Vol (2): 147- 156
  11. Sudjana. 2005. Metoda Statistika (Edisi ke-6. Cetakan ke-3). Bandung: Tarsito Bandung
  12. Wardhana, A. 2009. Penggunaan Partial Duration dalam Imunisasi Portofolio Obligasi Korporasi. Keuangan. Vol 13 (1):88-96
  13. Zubir, Z. 2012.Portofolio Obligasi. Jakarta: Salemba Empat

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.