BibTex Citation Data :
@article{LANTERN11398, author = {Nur Razan}, title = {THE REPRESENTATION OF MALE FIGURES IN 1969MARLBORO AND 1956 LUCKY STRIKE PRINTED ADVERTISEMENT}, journal = {LANTERN (Journal on English Language, Culture and Literature)}, volume = {5}, number = {1}, year = {2015}, keywords = {}, abstract = {Nowadays, people are getting consumptive because of impact of advertisements. Most of them do not know that the advertisements can change their perceptions toward a product. The product which is less popular before can rise highly because of attractive promotion derived by the advertisements. In the advertisements, audiences are given not only the product’s information, but also brand image represented by a figure. In Marlboro advertisement published on July 25, 1969 in Time Magazine and Lucky Strike advertisement published on 1956 in TV Radio Mirror Magazine Vol. 46 No. 1, for example, the figure shown is a man or men as gender preference of the marketing target. However, each advertisement have different concept which leads into a more specific marketing target. From the analysis using semiotics theory, it can be concluded that Marlboro is directed to male audiences who like freedom and nature while Lucky Strike is directed to male audiences whose lives cannot be separated from women and money. Thus, it gives different images of both brands. Marlboro has an image of macho while Lucky Strike has an image of rich and romantic. }, url = {https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/engliterature/article/view/11398} }
Refworks Citation Data :
Last update: