slot gacor slot gacor hari ini slot gacor 2025 demo slot pg slot gacor slot gacor
HUBUNGAN ANTARA KECERDASAN SOSIAL DENGAN ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR PADA KARYAWAN PT. TELKOM INDONESIA REGIONAL IV JAWA TENGAH DAN DI YOGYAKARTA | PUTRA | Jurnal EMPATI skip to main content

HUBUNGAN ANTARA KECERDASAN SOSIAL DENGAN ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR PADA KARYAWAN PT. TELKOM INDONESIA REGIONAL IV JAWA TENGAH DAN DI YOGYAKARTA

Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Received: 23 Mar 2018; Published: 26 Mar 2018.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Keberhasilan suatu perusahaan memerlukan dukungan penuh sumber daya manusia yang ditandai dengan Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB). Karyawan perusahaan dapat menciptakan lingkungan pekerjaan yang kondusif dengan kecerdasan sosial sehingga dapat berperilaku OCB. Teknik pengambilan sampel yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah teknik simple random sampling, dengan jumlah sampel 107 karyawan. Alat ukur yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah Skala Organizational Citizenship Behavior (30 aitem, α = 0,886) dan Skala Kecerdasan Sosial (35 aitem, α =0,928). Metode analisis data yang digunakan pada penelitian ini dengan analisis regresi linier sederhana. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ada hubungan positif signifikan antara kecerdasan sosial dengan Organizational Citizenship Behavior pada karyawan PT. Telkom Indonesia Regional IV (r= 0,681; p< 0,00). Hal tersebut menunjukan bahwa hipotesis yang diajukan peneliti, yaitu hubungan antara Kecerdasan Sosial dengan Organizational Citizenship Behavior pada Karyawan PT. Telkom Indonesia Regional IV dapat diterima. Semakin tinggi kecerdasan sosial maka semakin tinggi Organizational Citizenship Behavior pada karyawan PT. Telkom Indonesia Regional IV, sebaliknya semakin rendah kecerdasan sosial maka semakin rendah Organizational Citizenship Behavior pada karyawan PT. Telkom Indonesia Regional IV. Variabel kecerdasan sosial memberikan sumbangan efektif sebesar 46,4% terhadap Organizational Citizenship Behavior, 53,6% sisanya ditentukan oleh faktor lain yangtidak diteliti dalam penelitian ini.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: kecerdasan sosisal; organizational citizenship behavior; karyawan

Article Metrics:

  1. Aamodt, M. G. (2007). Industrial / organizational psychology : An applied
  2. approach (Sixth Edit). USA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning
  3. Albrecht, K. (2006). Social intelligence: The new science of success. In Business
  4. (Vol. 22, pp. 1–11). USA: Business Book Review
  5. Albrecht, K. (2008). Social intelligence: The new science of success. San
  6. Fransisco: Jossey-Bass. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036233190800061X
  7. Anonim. (2017, August 31). Rini pompa semangat karyawan Telkom pulihkan
  8. layanan satelit. Kabarbisnis.com. Retrieved from http://kabarbisnis.com/read/2878514/rini-pompa-semangat-karyawan-telkom-pulihkan-layanan-satelit
  9. Arif, A., & Chohan, A. (2012). How job satisfaction is influencing the organizational citizenship behavior (OCB): A study on employees working in banking sector of Pakistan. Interdisiplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 4(8), 74–88
  10. Armstrong, T. (2002). Multiple intelligence. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
  11. Azwar, S. (2014). Metode penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
  12. Azwar, S. (2015). Penyusunan skala psikologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
  13. Collins, J. (2015). Good to great. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama
  14. Crowne, K. a. (2009). The relationships among social intelligence, emotional intelligence and cultural intelligence. Organization Management Journal, 6(3), 148–163. https://doi.org/10.1057/omj.2009.20
  15. Fisk, G. M., & Friesen, J. P. (2012). Perceptions of leader emotion regulation and LMX as predictors of followers’ job satisfaction and organizational
  16. citizenship behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 23(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.11.001
  17. Glendon, A. I., Briony, M. T., & Myors, B. (2007). Advances in organizational psychology. Australia: Australian Academic Press
  18. Goleman, D. (2007). Emotional intelligence: Mengapa EI lebih penting daripada
  19. IQ. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka
  20. Goleman, D. (2015). Social intelligence: Ilmu baru tentang hubungan antar-
  21. manusia. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama
  22. Goleman, D., & Boyatziz, R. (2008). Social intelligence and the biology of leadership. Harvard Business Review, 86(9), 74–81. https://doi.org/Article
  23. Jackson, S. E., Randall, S., & Steve, W. (2010). Pengelolaan sumber daya manusia. Jakarta: Salemba Empat
  24. Jex, S. M., & Britt, T. W. (2008). Organizational psychology. New Jersey: John Willey ans Sons Inc
  25. Kamel, B., Mohmmed, B., Amine, E., & Abdeljalil, M. (2015). Relationship between job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior in the national company for distribution of electricity and gas. European Journal of Business and Management, 7(30), 1–6
  26. Kohlrieser, G. (2006). Hostage at the table: How leaders can overcome conflict,
  27. influence others, and raise performance george. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass
  28. Landy, F. J., & Conte, J. M. (2011). Work in the 21st century an introduction to industrial and organizational psychology. USA: Wiley
  29. McPheat, S. (2010). Emotional Intelligence. MTD Training & Ventus Publishing (Vol. 9). BookBooN. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203357385.ch5
  30. Mohammad, J., Habib, F. Q., & Alias, M. A. (2011). Job satisfaction and organisational citizenship behaviour: An empirical study at higher learning institutions. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 16(2), 149–165
  31. Mukharom, E. Y. (2012). Kinerja Karyawan Ditinjau dari Tingkat Pendidikan, Masa Kerja, dan Motivasi Kerja dengan Kepemimpinan Sebagai Variabel Moderating Di Kantor PDAM Kabupaten Sragen. Skripsi. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
  32. Muntean, M., Cabău, L. G., & Rînciog, V. (2014). Social business intelligence: A new perspective for decision makers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 124, 562–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.520
  33. Organ, W. D., Podsakoff, M. P., & Scott, M. B. (2006). Organizational Citizenship Behavior. London: Sage Publication, Inc
  34. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and future research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513–563. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600307
  35. Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2009). Organizational behavior. Jakarta: Salemba Empat
  36. Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2013). Organizational behavior (15th ed.). USA: Pearson Education. https://doi.org/10.12737/4477
  37. Robert D, S. (1998). The psychology of work and human performance. USA: Longman
  38. Saepung, W., Sukirno, & Siengthai, S. (2011). The relationship between job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior ( OCB ) in the retail industry in Indonesia. World Review of Business Research, 1(3), 162–178
  39. Salah, W., & Din, E. (2016). Investigating the relationship between job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior among Beni Suef Cement company employees. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 6(5). https://doi.org/10.4172/2223-5833.1000259
  40. Salehi, M., & Gholtash, A. (2011). The relationship between job satisfaction, job burnout and organizational commitment with the organizational citizenship behavior among members of faculty in the Islamic Azad University-first district branches, in order to provide the appropriate model. Procedia -
  41. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 306–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.091
  42. Silberman, M., & Hansburg, F. (2000). People smart: Developing your
  43. interpersonal intelligence. San Fransisco: Berrett-Koehler
  44. Spector, P. (2008). Industrial and organizational psychology. USA: Wiley
  45. Sugiyono. (2014). Statistika untuk penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta
  46. Swaminathan, S., & Jawahar, P. D. (2013). Job satisfaction as a predictor of organizational citizenship behavior: An empirical study. Global Journal of Business Research, 7(1), 71–80
  47. Talachi, R. K., Gorji, M. B., & Boerhannoeddin, A. Bin. (2014). An investigation of the role of job satisfaction in employees organizational citizenship behavior. Original Scientific Paper, 38(2), 429–436
  48. Tharikh, S. M., Ying, C. Y., Mohamed Saad, Z., & Sukumaran, K. a/p. (2016). Managing job attitudes: The roles of job satisfaction and organizational commitment on organizational citizenship behaviors. Procedia Economics and Finance, 35(October 2015), 604–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)00074-5
  49. Wan, H. L. (2016). Organisational justice and citizenship behaviour in Malaysia. Governance and Citizenship in Asia. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0030-0
  50. Weis, S., & Conzelmann, K. (2015). Social intelligence and competencies. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 22, 371– 379. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.25094-0
  51. Williams, W. M., & Sternberg, R. J. (1988). Group intelligence: Why some groups are better than others. Intelligence, 12(4), 351–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-2896(88)90002-5
  52. Winarsunu, T. (2010). Statistik dalam penelitian psikologi & pendidikan. Malang: UMM Press
  53. Yahyazadeh-Jeloudar, S., & Lotfi-Goodarzi, F. (2012). The relationship between social intelligence and job satisfaction among MA and BA teachers. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(8), 299–303. Retrieved from http://www.ijbssnet.com/journals/Vol_3_No_8_Special_Issue_April_2012/3 5.pdf
  54. Yuniar, I. G. A. A. Y., Nurtjahjanti, H., & Rusmawati, D. (2011). Hubungan antara kepuasan kerja dan resiliensi dengan organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) pada karyawan kantor pusat PT. BPD Bali. Jurnal Psikologi Undip, 9(1)
  55. Zeinabadia, H. (2010). Job satisfaction and antecedents of Organizational Citizenship Procedia - Social and Behavioral https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.225
  56. organizational commitment as Behavior (OCB) of teachers. Sciences, 5(2), 998–1003

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.