slot gacor slot gacor hari ini slot gacor 2025 demo slot pg slot gacor slot gacor
Analisa Stakeholder Dalam Penerapan Skema Land Value Capture di Kawasan Perdagangan Bebas Dompak, Tanjung Pinang | Alwan | Teknik PWK (Perencanaan Wilayah Kota) skip to main content

Analisa Stakeholder Dalam Penerapan Skema Land Value Capture di Kawasan Perdagangan Bebas Dompak, Tanjung Pinang

*Muhammad Hafizh Alwan  -  Planning Development Central Group Batam Kepulauan Riau, Indonesia, Indonesia
Wisnu Pradoto  -  Departement of Urban and Regional Planning, Universitas Diponegoro, Jl. Prof. Soedarto, Tembalang, Kec. Tembalang, Kota Semarang, Jawa Tengah 50275, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify the condition of stakeholders in the Dompak Free Trade Zone who have their own institutional patterns and government ways of working that have the opportunity to support the implementation of Land Value Capture. This study was conducted with a qualitative approach through descriptive analysis, namely reviewing government regulatory documents relevant to the condition of the study area and then relating it to the application of Land Value Capture and take a questionnaire with stakeholders. Data collection techniques were carried out through literature study, document review, and questionary.

The results of this study resulted in the grouping of each stakeholder into four categories namely key players, context setters, subjects, and crowds which were reviewed through six stages of stakeholder analysis. These results indicate a strong potential for implementing Land Value Capture where institutional regulations have supported the utilization of assets owned by local authorities. However, in its implementation, it still has to consider assets owned by local authorities and regulations that bind local government institutions to collaborate with each other in developing a land value capture-based Dompak Free Trade Zone.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Land Value Capture; Stakeholder; Regulation

Article Metrics:

  1. Danson, M., & Todeva, E. (2016). Government and Governance of Regional Triple Helix Interactions. Industry and Higher Education, 30(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.5367/ihe.2016.0293
  2. Dryzek, J. S., & Berejikian, J. (1993). Reconstructive democratic theory. American Political Science Review, 87(1), 48–60
  3. Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge university press
  4. Grimble, R., Chan, M.-K., Aglionby, J., & Quan, J. (1995). Trees and trade-offs: a stakeholder approach to natural resource management
  5. Gatekeeper Series-Sustainable Agriculture Programme, International Institute for Environment and Development (United Kingdom)
  6. Hare, M., & Pahl-Wostl, C. (2002). Stakeholder categorisation in participatory integrated assessment processes. Integrated Assessment, 3(1), 50–62
  7. Lawanson, T., & Agunbiade, M. (2018). Land governance and megacity projects in Lagos, Nigeria: the case of Lekki Free Trade Zone. Area Development and Policy, 3(1), 114–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/23792949.2017.1399804
  8. Medda, F. (2012). Land value capture finance for transport accessibility: a review. Journal of Transport Geography, 25, 154–161
  9. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. (1997). J. Towards a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886
  10. Namangaya, A. H. (2019). Challenges in Administering Property Value Capture in Tanzanian Cities. Open Journal of Business and Management, 07(03), 1412–1428. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbm.2019.73097
  11. Phillips, R. (2013). Stakeholder Theory. Stakeholder Theory. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857936349
  12. Putri, D. F. (2017). Analisa Stakeholder dalam Implementasi Kebijakan Kenanggulangan Kemiskinan Di Kota Madiun. Universitas Airlangga, 1–10. Retrieved from http://repository.unair.ac.id/74877/3/JURNAL_Fis.P.36 18 Put s.pdf
  13. Ramirez, R. (1999). Stakeholder analysis and conflict management. In Cultivating peace: conflict and collaboration in natural resource management. IDRC, Ottawa, ON, CA
  14. Reed, M. S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., Posthumus, H., Hubacek, K., Morris, J., … Stringer, L. C. (2009). Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1933–1949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001
  15. Walters, L. C. (2012). Land Value Capture in Policy and Practice. (Lvc), 1–20. Retrieved from http://www.landandpoverty.com/agenda/pdfs/paper/walters_full_paper.pdf

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.