skip to main content

Preferensi Pengguna Terhadap Rancangan Desain Fasilitas Integrasi Antarmoda Yang Responsif Pandemi COVID-19 Di Kawasan TOD Dukuh Atas

*Muhammad Audi Daffi  -  Bappenas Jakarta, Indonesia
Novia Sari Ristianti  -  Urban and Regional Planning Department, Universitas Diponegoro, Jl. Prof. Sudarto, SH, Tembalang, Semarang, Indonesia 50275, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract
COVID-19 is a case of infectious disease that is of concern throughout the world. The intermodal integration facility as a public transportation space has the potential to become a center for the spread of the virus because of its general use. This study aims to formulate an intermodal integration facility design that is responsive to the COVID-19 pandemic in the Dukuh Atas TOD area based on its users so that they can be safe from the threat of the virus while mobilizing to meet their daily needs. This study uses quantitative methods with analytical techniques in the form of descriptive analysis to determine the design of a responsive intermodal integration facility based on the aspect of the facility. The facilities aspect discussed relates to seating arrangements, health facilities, and touch facilities. This study resulted in a design in the form of seating arrangements by limiting the user's sitting area using vegetation, promoting health facilities by providing automatic hand sanitizers placed at entrances and exits, as well as the use of modern technology on touch facilities to prevent direct contact of users with the public facilities.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Intermodal Integration Facility; Design; COVID-19

Article Metrics:

  1. Batara, A. S., & Muzakkir, A. K. (2018). Healthy Setting Ruang Publik Perkotaan: Sebuah Konsep Terminal Sehat. CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn)
  2. City of Baltimore. (2020). Design For Distancing Ideas Guidebook. In Design for Distancing: Reopening Baltimore Together
  3. D’alessandro, D., Gola, M., Appolloni, L., Dettori, M., Fara, G. M., Rebecchi, A., Settimo, G., & Capolongo, S. (2020). COVID-19 and living space challenge. Well-being and public health recommendations for a healthy, safe, and sustainable housing. Acta Biomedica, 91(1), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i9-S.10115
  4. Dahlia, S. (2021). Analisis Pola Spasial Pesebaran Kasus Covid-19 Menggunakan Sistem Informasi Geografis Di DKI Jakarta. Jurnal Geografi, Edukasi Dan Lingkungan (JGEL), 5(2), 101–108. https://doi.org/10.22236/jgel.v5i2.7098
  5. de Bruin, Y. B., Lequarre, A.-S., McCourt, J., Clevestig, P., Pigazzani, F., Jeddi, M. Z., Colosio, C., & Goulart, M. (2020). Initial impacts of global risk mitigation measures taken during the combatting of the COVID-19 pandemic. Safety Science, 128, 104773
  6. Eltarabily, S., & Elghezanwy, D. (2020). Post-Pandemic Cities - The Impact of COVID-19 on Cities and Urban Design. Architecture Research, 10(3), 75–84
  7. Government of the United Kingdom. (2020). COVID-19 Secure: Safer Public Places - Urban Centres and Green Spaces. In UK Government Publications
  8. Hussain, S., Cheema, M. J. M., Motahhir, S., Iqbal, M. M., Arshad, A., Waqas, M. S., Khalid, M. U., & Malik, S. (2020). Proposed design of walk-through gate (WTG): Mitigating the effect of COVID-19. Applied System Innovation, 3(3), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi3030041
  9. ITDP Indonesia. (2019). Pedoman Integrasi Antarmoda. Institute for Transportation and Policy Development, 1–38
  10. Jia, J., Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Li, T., & Li, Y. (2021). A new global method for identifying urban rail transit key station during COVID-19: A case study of Beijing, China. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2020.125578
  11. Kamel, A. (2020). Sensible Social Distancing Solutions for Covid-19 Recovery. Green Furniture Concept. https://greenfc.com/stories/sensible-social-distancing-solutions-for-covid-19
  12. Kamga, C., & Eickemeyer, P. (2021). Slowing the spread of COVID-19: Review of “Social distancing” interventions deployed by public transit in the United States and Canada. Transport Policy, 106(March), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.03.014
  13. Martunus, R. W. (2020). Dari Primadona Menjadi Ancaman: Memikirkan Kembali Transportasi Massal/ Publik Sebagai Faktor Utama Pergerakan Dalam Kota. 10–20
  14. Mutlu, M. M., Aksoy, İ. C., & Alver, Y. (2021). Covid-19 transmission risk minimization at public transportation stops using differential evolution algorithm. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 21(1), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.18757/EJTIR.2021.21.1.5129
  15. Rakhmatulloh, A. R., Kusumodewi, D. I., & Suwandono, D. (2020). COVID-19 : The Questions Ahead for Future Pedestrian Ways in Transit Area. The 5th International Conference on Energy, Environmental and Information System (ICENIS 2020). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202020203021
  16. Serrano, F., & Kazda, A. (2020). Journal of Air Transport Management The future of airports post COVID-19. Journal of Air Transport Management, 89(August), 101900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2020.101900
  17. Shaftoe, H. (2008). Convivial Urban Spaces: Creating Effective Public Places. Earthscan
  18. Shirvani, H. (1985). The Urban Design Process. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.