DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/tpwk.2023.33573

Kajian Risiko Bencana Kebakaran pada Kawasan Permukiman Padat di Kecamatan Samarinda Ulu, Kota Samarinda

*Afanggi Oktavian  -  Departemen Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Diponegoro., Indonesia
Mardwi Rahdriawan  -  Departemen Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Diponegoro., Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract
The high population density causes residential areas to become dense and irregular. Dense and irregular residential areas create the condition of electricity network seems tangled, it is very prone to causing short circuits which can trigger a residential fire. Samarinda Ulu District has the highest population density in Samarinda City, which has occurred 34 residential fire cases in 2020. Therefore this research was conducted to determine the level of residential fire disaster risk for each sub-district in Samarinda Ulu District based on the analysis results of hazard, vulnerability, and capacity of residential fire disaster. This research used a quantitative method with a matrix approach based on the scoring process through a descriptive statistical analysis to classify the level of residential fire disaster risk. The result of this research found that Jawa and Bukit Pinang Sub-Districts have a high level of residential fire disaster risk in the Samarinda Ulu District. The high level of residential fire disaster risk concludes the area has low resilience to minimize potential damage and losses due to a residential fire disaster caused by the low ability to protect and handlethe fire residential hazard.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Residential Fire;Hazard;Vulnerability;Capacity;Risk

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : ID
Recent articles
Tingkat Kenyamanan Taman Balai Kota Bandung Berdasarkan Perspektif Pengunjung Pertumbuhan dan Sebaran Penduduk Perkotaan di Kabupaten Cirebon Pemodelan Fenomena Urban Heat Island di Kawasan Metropolitan Semarang Tahun 2000-2020 More recent articles
  1. Badan Pusat Statistika Kota Samarinda dalam Angka 2021
  2. Benson, C., Twigg, J., & Rossetto, T. (2007). Tools for Mainstreaming Disaster Risk Reduction: Guidance Notes for Development Organisations. Geneva: ProVention Consortium
  3. Dondo Bühler, M., de Torres Curth, M., & Garibaldi, L. A. (2013). Demography and socioeconomic vulnerability influence fire occurrence in Bariloche (Argentina). Landscape and Urban Planning, 110(1), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.10.006
  4. Coburn, A.W., Spence, R.J.S., & Pomonis. A. (1994). Mitigasi Bencana (Edisi Kedua) Program Pelatihan Manajemen Bencana. United Kingdom: Cambridge Architectural Research Limited
  5. Coppola, D. (2007). Introduction to International Disaster Management. Oxford: Elsevier
  6. Darsono, N. A. (2012). Analisis Risiko Kebakaran Permukiman di Kecamatan Pasar Kliwon Tahun 2011. UNS-FKIP Jur. Pend, Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial-K.5407004-2012
  7. Duncanson, M., Woodward, M. and Reid, P. (2002). Socioeconomic Seprivation and Fatal Unintentional Domestic Fire Incidents in New Zealand 1993–1998. Fire Safety Journal, 37: 165–179
  8. Fransisca, R., Adyatma, S., & Nugroho, A. R. (2016). Kerentanan Kebakaran di Kelurahan Sungai Andai Kecamatan Banjarmasin Utara Kota Banjarmasin. JPG (Jurnal Pendidikan Geografi), 1(2)
  9. Kai Huang, B., Shields, P., Longoria, T., & Prestwood, E. (2009). Population and Building Factors that Impact Residential Fire Rates in Large U.S. Cities. Masters of Public Administration, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX
  10. Januandari, M. U., Rachmawati, T. A., & Sufianto, H. (2017). Analisa Risiko Bencana Kebakaran Kawasan Segiempat Tunjungan Surabaya. Jurnal Pengembangan Kota, 5(2), 149. https://doi.org/10.14710/jpk.5.2.149-158
  11. Jennings. (1997). Socioeconomic Factors and The Incidence of Fire. Washington, D.C: Federal Emergency Management Agency, United States Fire Administration, National Fire Data Center
  12. Murray, A. T. (2013). Optimizing the spatial location of urban fire stations. Fire Safety Journal, 62, 64–71. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2013.03.002
  13. Navitas, P. (2014). Improving Resilience against Urban Fire Hazards through Environmental Design in Dense Urban Areas in Surabaya, Indonesia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 135, 178–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.344
  14. Nurwulandari, F. S. (2016). Kajian Mitigasi Bencana Kebakaran di Pemukiman Padat. Jurnal Informasi,Manajemen Dan Teknologi, 18(1)
  15. Peraturan Kepala Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana Nomor 2 Tahun 2012 tentang Pedoman Umum Pengkajian Risiko Bencana
  16. Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat Nomor 20/PRT/M/2009 tentang Pedoman Teknis Manajemen Proteksi Kebakaran di Perkotaan
  17. Porteus, R. (2019). What is a Portable Fire Extinguisher ?. Dalam www.firewize.com. Diakses pada 23 Januari 2022
  18. Rahman, N., Ansary, M. A., & Islam, I. (2015). GIS based mapping of vulnerability to earthquake and fire hazard in Dhaka city, Bangladesh. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 13, 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.07.003
  19. UN. (2002). Living with Risk: A Global Review of Disaster Reduction Initiatives. Geneva: United Nations/Inter-Agency Secretariat of the International Strategy for Disaster Reduction
  20. UNISDR. (2015). Making Development Sustainable: The Future of Disaster Risk Management. Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR)

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.