DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/tpwk.2020.28320

Persepsi Mahasiswa terhadap Ruang Terbuka Hijau Ideal di Kampus Undip Tembalang

*Iras Nurlita Fitriani  -  Departemen Perencanaan WIlayah dan Kota Fakultas Teknik Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Retno Susanti  -  Departemen Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota Fakultas Teknik Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

Diponegoro University is a university with 73% of green open space. Green open space is good for supporting physical and mental health and academic performance of students. But in order for GOS to be used optimally, it is necessary to provide the suitable GOS. The purpose of this study is to find out what students' perceptions of the ideal green space. This research method uses a mixed approach. The analysis is carried out by performing content analysis and frequency distribution analysis. Result shows that there are 47 variations of ideal GOS criteria according to Undip Tembalang students. Then students are asked to choose one of the 6 GOS which they think is the most ideal. Analysis of the criteria that affect the selection of each GOS shows that the ideal GOS in Tembalang Undip Campus is based on 32 criteria. In addition, the findings show that the activities that are mostly carried out by students in GOS are physical activities and social interactions. This becomes the basis in determining the ideal green space on the Undip Tembalang Campus which show that the Undip Reservoir Area is the most ideal green space at this time.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Green Open Space; Students Perceptions; Campus

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Recent articles
Tipologi Zona Desa-Kota dengan Pendekatan Transek di Lasem , Kabupaten Rembang Dinamika Fungsi Kota Lasem dalam Perkembangan Wilayah Kajian Daya Dukung Beras di Kabupaten Pekalongan More recent articles
  1. Beil, K., & Hanes, D. (2013). The influence of urban natural and built environments on physiological and psychological measures of stress—A pilot study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10(4), 1250–1267. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10041250
  2. Cole, F. L. (1988). Content analysis: process and application. Clinical Nurse Specialist, 2(1), 53–57
  3. Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
  4. Frick, H., & Mulyani, T. H. (2006). Arsitektur Ekologis: Konsep Arsitektur Ekologis di iklim Tropis. Penghijauan Kota Dan Kota Ekologis, Sefta Energi Terbarukan, Yogyakarta: Penerbit Kanisius
  5. Griffith, J. C. (1994). Open space preservation: An imperative for quality campus environments. The Journal of Higher Education, 65(6), 645–669. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1994.11774745
  6. Hanan, H. (2013). Open Space as Meaningful Place for Students in ITB Campus. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 85, 308–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.361
  7. Hyun, J. K., Quinn, B. C., Madon, T., & Lustig, S. (2006). Graduate student mental health: Needs assessment and utilization of counseling services. Journal of College Student Development, 47(3), 247–266. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2006.0030
  8. Irvine, K. N., Warber, S. L., Devine-Wright, P., & Gaston, K. J. (2013). Understanding urban green space as a health resource: A qualitative comparison of visit motivation and derived effects among park users in sheffield, UK. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10(1), 417–442. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10010417
  9. Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage publications
  10. Lee, A. C. K., & Maheswaran, R. (2010). The health benefits of urban green spaces : a review of the evidence. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 33(2), 212–222. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdq068
  11. McCormack, G. R., Rock, M., Toohey, A. M., & Hignell, D. (2010). Characteristics of urban parks associated with park use and physical activity: A review of qualitative research. Health & Place, 16(4), 712–726. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.03.003
  12. McFarland, A. L., Waliczek, T. M., & Zajicek, J. M. (2010). Graduate student use of campus green spaces and the impact on their perceptions of quality of life. HortTechnology, 20(1), 186–192. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH.20.1.186
  13. PU, K. (2008). Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum Nomor 5 Tahun 2008 tentang Pedoman Penyediaan dan Pemanfaatan Ruang Terbuka Hijau di Kawasan Perkotaan
  14. Rice, P. L. (1992). Stress and health, 2nd ed. In Stress and health, 2nd ed. Belmont, CA, US: Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing Co
  15. Ross, S. E., Niebling, B. C., & Heckert, T. M. (1999). Sources of stress among college students. Social Psychology, 61(5), 841–846
  16. UI. (2018). UI GreenMetric World University Rankings 2018

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.