skip to main content

Kajian Kuantitas dan Kualitas Taman Aktif di Kecamatan Tembalang dan Kecamatan Banyumanik

*Intan Budiarti  -  Departemen Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota Fakultas Teknik Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Retno Susanti  -  Departemen Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota Fakultas Teknik Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract
Tembalang District and Banyumanik District are districts that have several well-known universities with population growth more rapidly than other districts in Semarang City. This increase in population can also trigger an increase in development to meet housing needs. This increase in development often forgets that active parks must be provided to maintain a balance between built up and non-built lands. The purpose of this study was to examine the quantity and quality of active parks in Tembalang District and Banyumanik District. The method used in this research is quantitative as well as qualitative research methods or commonly known as mixed research methods. Quantitative research uses descriptive normative analysis methods, while qualitative research uses content analysis methods. Based on the objectives to be achieved in this study, the results are obtained that the quantity of active parks that still do not meet the needs of residents in Tembalang District and Banyumanik District. This is indicated by the area of the park that still needs to be provided in Tembalang District is 32,559 m2 and Banyumanik District is 21,005 m2. As for the assessment of the quality of existing active parks, it has been well proven by the opinion of respondents who said that the condition of the sports field, parking, park chairs, safety, and cleanliness of the park was good. As for the quality that is considered poor, only children's play facilities, lighting, and the availability of vegetation.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Active Park Quantity; Active Park Quality

Article Metrics:

  1. Abbasi, A., Alalouch, C., & Bramley, G. (2016). Open Space Quality in Deprived Urban Areas: User Perspective and Use Pattern. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 216, 194-205
  2. Arku, G., Yeboah, I. E. A. and Nyantakyi-Frimpong, H. (2016) ‘Public parks as an element of urban planning: a missing piece in Accra’s growth and development’, Local Environment, 21(12), pp. 1500–1515. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2016.1140132
  3. Creswell, John, W. 2007. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. California: Sage Publications, Inc
  4. Feng, X., & Astell-Burt, T. (2017). Residential Green Space Quantity and Quality and Child Well-being: A Longitudinal Study. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 53(5), 616–624. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.06.035
  5. Frick, Heinz. (2006). Arsitektur Ekologis - Konsep Arsitektur Ekologis di Iklim Tropis, Penghijauan Kota dan Kota Ekologis, Serta Energi Terbarukan. Kanisiun: Yogyakarta
  6. Hakim, Rustam. (2002). Komponen Perancangan Arsitektur Lansekap (Prinsip Unsur dan Aplikasi Desain). Jakarta: Penerbit Bumi Aksara
  7. Hegazy, I. R. and Kaloop, M. R. (2015) ‘Monitoring urban growth and land use change detection with GIS and remote sensing techniques in Daqahlia governorate Egypt’, International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment. The Gulf Organisation for Research and Development, 4(1), pp. 117–124. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsbe.2015.02.005
  8. Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 1 Tahun 2007 tentang Penataan Ruang Terbuka Hijau Kawasan Perkotaan. (n.d.)
  9. Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum Nomor 05/PRT/M/2008 tentang Pedoman Penyediaan dan Pemanfaatan Ruang Terbuka Hijau di Kawasan Perkotaan. (n.d.)
  10. Rojas, C. et al. (2013) ‘Assessing land-use and -cover changes in relation to geographic factors and urban planning in the metropolitan area of Concepción (Chile). Implications for biodiversity conservation’, Applied Geography. Elsevier Ltd, 39, pp. 93–103. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.12.007
  11. Setiowati, R., Hasibuan, H. S. and Koestoer, R. H. (2018) ‘Green open space masterplan at Jakarta Capital City, Indonesia for climate change mitigation’, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 200(1), pp. 0–8. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/200/1/012042
  12. Shani, F.M. (2015). Kajian Ketersediaan dan Kebutuhan Ruang Terbuka Hijau Kawasan Perkotaan di Kota Sukabumi. Skripsi. Fakultas Geografi. Universitas Gadjah Mada. Yogyakarta
  13. Syafrina, A., dkk. (2018). Preferensi Masyarakat tentang Lingkungan Perumahan yang Ingin Ditinggali. Jurnal RUAS (Review of Urbanism and Architectural Studies). 16(1), 32-45

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.