skip to main content

Transformasi Sosial Ekonomi Penduduk Lokal Akibat Adanya Pembangunan Di Kawasan Solo Baru Kabupaten Sukoharjo

*Lintang Rahmayana  -  Departemen Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota Fakultas Teknik Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Wiwandari Handayani  -  Departemen Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota Fakultas Teknik Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

Solo Baru Region is located in Grogol,   Sukoharjo District. Formerly, Solobaru was a rural region, but with the building that was caused by the development of urban, makes the Solo Baru Region being urban built up area. Where there is the largest mall in Sukoharjo, the elite housing, apartments and hotels etc. The changes impact the socio- economic structural in its local communities. Based on these matters raise the question of how the socio-economic transformation of the local residents due to the construction in the area of Solo Baru? The research method in this study using quantitative methods with descriptive format in whict the data is obtained from the questionnaire and fiel survey. Weighting for the variables using analytic pairwise method technique. Based on the analysis can be seen there has been a change in the socio-economic of its local communities in  Solo  Baru Region due to the development  in  the  area. The greatest changes are on the economic aspect, while social changes are likely not to be too large because of changes in this aspect is slow. Changes in social aspects can be evidenced by 43% of respondents feel the changing skills, 18.8% of respondents feel the decline in customs, and in terms of accessibilities there are approximately 48.50% of respondents reporting an increase in the number of trips. As for changes in the economic aspects can be evidenced by 95% of respondents experienced an increase in revenue. In addition to a change in the livelihood of 63.40% of respondents. The majority of respondents who changed in  livelihood are become the sellers.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Perkembangan Kawasan, Peri Urban, Perubahan Sosial Ekonom, Solo Baru

Article Metrics:

  1. Bintarto, R. (1986). Urbanisasi dan permasalahannya. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia
  2. Bungin, B. (2005). Metodologi penelitian kuantitatif: Komunikasi, ekonomi, dan kebijakan publik serta ilmu-ilmu sosial lainnya. Jakarta: Kencana
  3. Handayani, W. (2011). Emergence of Rural-Urban Regions in Central Java Province-Indonesia: Analysis, Assessment, and Policy Recommendations. German: Cuvillier
  4. Rudiarto, I & Wiwandari, H. (2012). Dinamika Persebaran Penduduk Jawa Tengah: Perumusan Kebijakan Perwilayahan Dengan Metode Kernel Density. Dinamika Persebaran Penduduk Jawa Tengah: Perumusan Kebijakan Perwilayahan Dengan Metode Kernel Density. [Home page of Eprints UNDIP] [Online]. Availabel at: http://eprints.undip.ac.id/35618/. Diakses pada tanggal 13 April 2016
  5. Kartiko dkk. (1998). Sekilas Sejarah Perjuangan SOLO BARU Kota Mandiri. Semarang: Cipta Sarana Megah Utama
  6. Kementriann Pekerjaan Umum Provinsi Jawa Tengah. (2014). SPPIP-RPKPP dan DED Kawasan Prioritas Kabupaten Sukoharjo. Makala disampaikan pada Sosialisasi RP2KP/SPPIP, Semarang, 5 Juni 2014
  7. Kinanti, A. S. (2013). Perkembangan Wilayah Peri Urban Kecamatan Depok, Kabupaten Sleman Dalam Perspektif Demografi Dan Kondisi Sosial Ekonomi Masyarakat. Tugas Akhir tidak diterbitkan, Program Studi Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, Fakulyas Teknik Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang
  8. Knox, P. L. & McCarthy, L. (2012). Urbanization: An introduction to urban geography. Boston: Pearson
  9. Lang, W., Chen, T. & Li, X. (2016). A new style of urbanization in China: Transformation of urban rural communities. Habitat International, 55, 1-9
  10. Leaf, M. (2002). A tale of two villages: globalization and peri-urban change in China and
  11. Vietnam. Cities, 19(1), 23-31
  12. Pratama, F. (2016). Pro Poor Development in Empowering Poor Farmer Household to Alleviate Poverty by Getting Stability of Agriculture Product to Face A Condition of Rural-Urban Transformation’s Impact A case Study in Parakan Sub-District, Temanggung, Central Java. Paper presented in 13th International Asian Urbanization Conference, Yogyakarta, 6-8 Januari 2016
  13. Pradoto, W. (2012). Development patterns and socioeconomic transformation in peri-urban area. German: Univerlagtuberlin
  14. Saaty, T. L. (1993). Pengambilan keputusan bagi para pemimpin. Jakarta: PT Pustaka Binaman Pressindo
  15. Sari, M. K., & Winarso, H. (2007). Transformasi Sosial Ekonomi Masyarakat Peri-Urban di Sekitar Pengembangan Lahan Skala Besar: Kasus Bumi Serpong Damai. Jurnal Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, Vol.18(1)
  16. Sarwono, J. (2006). Metode penelitian kuantitatif & kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu
  17. Setiawan, N. (2005). Perubahan Konsep Perkotaan di Indonesia dan Implikasinya terhadap Analisis Urbanisasi. Bandung: Universitas Padjadjaran
  18. Susila, W. R., & Munadi, E. 2007. Penggunaan Analytical Hierarchy Process untuk Penyusunan Prioritas
  19. Proposal Penelitian. Informatika Pertanian, Vol. 16(2), 983-998
  20. Tian, L. (2015). Land use dynamics driven by rural industrialization and land finance in the peri-urban areas of China: The examples of Jiangyin and Shunde. Land Use Policy, 45, 117-127
  21. Wajdi, N., van Wissen, L. J., & Mulder, C. H. (2015). Interregional migration flows in Indonesia. Sojourn: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia, 30(2), 371-422
  22. Winarso, H., Hudalah, D., & Firman, T. (2015). Peri-urban transformation in the Jakarta metropolitan area. Habitat International, 49, 221-229
  23. Woltjer, J. (2014). A global review on peri-urban development and planning. Jurnal Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, 25(1), 1-16
  24. Wulangsari, A. (2014). Tipologi Segregasi Permukiman berdasarkan Faktor dan Pola Permukiman di Solo Baru, Sukoharjo. Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah & Kota, 10(4), 387-399

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.