skip to main content

Perwilayahan Pariwisata Di Kabupaten Semarang Dengan Model Titik Pusat

*Titi Ariyati  -  Departemen Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota Fakultas Teknik Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Hadi Wahyono  -  Departemen Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota Fakultas Teknik Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

Tourism uniqueness and diversity in a region affect tourism development of that region. One of the suitable developing strategy for a region which has a lot of tourist attractions is a tourism regionalization. Tourism regionalization means dividing tourism regions which has potential, and then make it into a tourism destination. Tourist attraction in Semarang Regency can be classified into 8 types which is nature, cultural, historical, man made, pilgrim, industrial, sports, and culinary. This research aims to describe tourism potential of Semarang Regency and arrange tourism regions with Mean Centre Model as one of developing strategy in Semarang Regency. Tourism regionalization expected to improve all of the tourism potential in order to make them developing together. The research question is how the tourism potential in Semarang Regency and how to develop them based on tourism regionalization which is suitable for tourism in Semarang Regency to make it develop optimally?. Regionalization can be done by reviewing types and potential level of tourist attraction, deciding tourist attraction hierarchy, and arrange tourism regionalization with Mean Centre Model. Methods in this research are Delphi method and Mean Centre method. Delphi method used to decide types, potential level, and hierarchy of tourist attraction. Mean Centre method used to determine mean centre as a reference of tourism regionalization. Tourism regionalization arrangement in Semarang Regency aims to give input about developing tourism strategy in Semarang Regency in order to make it developed optimally.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: regionalization, tourism, tourist attraction

Article Metrics:

  1. Angelkova, T., Koteski, C., Jakovlev, Z., & Mitrevska, E. (2012). SUSTAINABILITY AND COMPETITIVENESS OF, 44, 221–227. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.023
  2. Ariyati, T., & Wahyono, H. (2016). Peta perwilayahan pariwisata berdasarkan sub titik pusat di Kabupaten Semarang dapat dilihat pada gambar 5. Teknik PWK (Perencanaan Wilayah Kota), 5(2), 128–140
  3. BPS Kabupaten Semarang. (2015). Kabupaten Semarang Dalam Angka 2015. Kabupaten Semarang
  4. Estêvão, C. M. S. and F. J. J. (2009). THE TOURISM CLUSTERS ROLE IN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT : PRESENTING A COMPETITIVENESS CONCEPTUAL MODEL, (2003), 127–139
  5. Ho, P., Ap, J., & Tony, T. (2009). Manual on Elective II - Theme Parks and Attractions. Hong Kong: The Hong kong Politechnic University
  6. Ivanovic, M. (2008). Cultural Tourism. (K. McGillivray, Ed.). Cape Town: JUTA
  7. Marimin. (2004). Teknik dan Aplikasi Pengambilan Keputusan Kriteria Majemuk. Jakarta: Grasindo
  8. Pendit, N. S. (2006). Ilmu Pariwisata: Sebuah Pengantar Perdana (8th ed.). Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita
  9. Pitana, I. G., & Gayatri, P. G. (2005). Sosiologi Pariwisata. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi
  10. Smith, S. (1989). Tourism Analysis (1st ed.). London: Longman Scientific and Technical
  11. Šušić, V., & Dejan, Đ. (2011). THE PLACE AND ROLE OF EVENTS IN THE TOURIST DEVELOPMENT OF THE SOUTHWEST SERBIA CLUSTER , 8, 69–81
  12. Suwantoro, G. (2004). Dasar - Dasar Pariwisata. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi
  13. Tongco, M. D. C. (2007). Purposive sampling as a tool for informant selection. Ethnobotany Research and Applications, 5, 147–158
  14. Yoeti, O. A. (1985). Pengantar Ilmu Pariwisata. Bandung: Penerbit Angkasa

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.