EVALUASI HAK & KEWAJIBAN ANTARA PERJANJIAN KONTRAK NASIONAL DENGAN PERSYARATAN STANDAR FIDIC (STUDI KASUS: PROYEK PEMBANGUNAN GEDUNG PEMUDA DAN KEBUDAYAAN TEMANGGUNG)

*Satrio Agung Utomo  -  Jurusan Teknik Sipil FT. UNDIP, Indonesia
Yanuar Asmara Putra  -  Jurusan Teknik Sipil FT. UNDIP, Indonesia
Arif Hidayat  -  Jurusan Teknik Sipil FT. UNDIP, Indonesia
Frida Kistiani  -  Jurusan Teknik Sipil FT. UNDIP, Indonesia
Published: 3 Feb 2016.
View
Open Access
Citation Format:
Article Info
Section: Articles
Language: EN
Statistics: 128 114
Abstract
In construction projects is often a dispute between the owner and the contractor, due to imbalance between the rights and obligations of the clauses of agreement contained in the contract agreement. Many standard contract used in Indonesia and abroad. One of the example is international FIDIC standard. To minimize imbalance, its important to know what are prone clause disputes based on standard FIDIC. The purpose of this study was to determine what clauses are prone to dispute and to see how the necessity of FIDIC standard is applied at the national contract documents. The data and information comes from the research and literature studies (books, regulations). Data processing is done by analyzing the rights and obligations of the owner and contractor clauses in contract document itself, then be reviewed with the FIDIC standard, and latter to compare the two. Regarding verification and validation perfomed by interviewing field of construction experts. The results showed that vulnerable disputed clauses are clause sanctions, payments, fines, bail enforcement, contract value, and the exercise period. Then concluded also that the terms of contract in Indonesia doesn’t need to refer FIDIC standard, because FIDIC standard deemed not appropriate when applied in Indonesia due to regulatory problems.
Keywords: Contract construction; FIDIC contract requirements; analysis of rights and obligations; potential disputes

Article Metrics: