skip to main content

ANALYSIS OF FATIGUE RISK FACTORS ON WORKERS IN X TOFU FACTORY, SEMARANG

*Amirul Afif Zakaria  -  Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Diponegoro, Jl. Prof. Sudarto, SH, Tembalang, Semarang, Indonesia 50275, Indonesia
Received: 28 Dec 2022; Published: 2 Apr 2024.

Citation Format:
Abstract
Fatigue is a condition where there is a decrease in the capacity or performance of workers who usually appears with feelings of weakness caused by physical and psychological factors. Fatigue in Tofu X factory workers can lead to decreased productivity and/or preparedness which can result in work accidents. The purpose of this study was to analyze work fatigue and the factors that influence work fatigue at Tofu X factory. The data collection process was carried out from November to December 2022, data was taken from 10 (ten) informants (workers). This study used a descriptive qualitative design with observation and in-depth interviews to obtain the characteristics of the informants, physical workload, length of service, and hot work climate. The results of the study showed that workers with a mild underweight nutritional status had the highest fatigue scores compared to normal nutritional status and mildly obese nutritional status. Workers with the female gender, even though they have a lighter workload, still experience work fatigue. Work fatigue in workers with the shortest tenure has a higher fatigue score compared to workers with long tenure. The physical workload felt by workers based on measurements of the working pulse is quite heavy so that complaints arise from workers. Measurements of the hot working climate show that several soybean processing posts have a Wet Bulb Globe Temperature Index above the Threshold Value. Workers experience medium category work fatigue, and symptoms of fatigue are felt in the form of complaints such as dizziness, weakness, aches in several parts of the body, and difficulty controlling emotions
Fulltext
Keywords: Work Fatigue; Cause Factors; Tofu Factory

Article Metrics:

  1. Atiqoh, J., Wahyuni, I., & Lestantyo, D. FaktorFaktor yang Berhubungan dengan Kelelahan
  2. Kerja pada Pekerja Konveksi Bagian Penjahitan
  3. di CV. Aneka Garment Gunungpati Semarang
  4. WHO/ILO, http://www.ilo.org/global/about-the
  5. ilo/newsroom/news/WCMS_819705/lang--
  6. en/index.thm (diakses pada 28 September 2022)
  7. Maftuh, M., Haryanti, T., & Johar, S. (2021)
  8. Pengaruh Iklim Kerja Panas Terhadap Kelelahan
  9. Kerja pada Operator Steam di PT. XYZ
  10. Boyolali. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan
  11. Kesehatan Masyarakat Indonesia, 2(2), 141-147
  12. https://doi.org/10.15294/jppkmi.v2i2.52432
  13. Izza Amalia, Noeroel Widajati. Analisa
  14. Kelelahan Kerja Secara Obyektif Berdasarkan
  15. Reaction Timer pada Tenaga Kerja Unit
  16. Pengerolan Besi PT. X. Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan
  17. Masyarakat, Maret 2018, 9(1):53-63
  18. Ervita U. Faktor yang Berhubungan dengan
  19. Kelelahan Kerja pada Tenaga Kerja Bongkar
  20. Muat di Pelabuhan Soekarno-Hatta Makassar
  21. Nela Pima Rahmawati, Bambang Swasto AP
  22. Pengaruh Lingkungan Kerja terhadap Kinerja
  23. Karyawan. 2014;8(2)
  24. Elena Volpi, Reza Nazemi, Satoshi Fujita
  25. Muscle Tissue Changes with aging. 2004
  26. W. Kusgiyanto, S. Suroto, and E. Ekawati,
  27. "Analisis Hubungan Beban Kerja Fisik, Masa
  28. Kerja, Usia, Dan Jenis Kelamin Terhadap
  29. Tingkat Kelelahan Kerja Pada Pekerja Bagian
  30. Pembuatan Kulit Lumpia Di Kelurahan
  31. Kranggan Kecamatan Semarang Tengah," Jurnal
  32. Kesehatan Masyarakat, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 413 -
  33. , Oct. 2017
  34. Suma’mur . Higiene Perusahaan dan Kesehatan
  35. Kerja (Hiperkes). 2009
  36. Langgar, D.P., & Setyawati, V.A.V. 2014
  37. Hubungan antara asupan gizi dan status gizi
  38. dengan kelelahan kerja pada karyawan
  39. perusahaan Tahu Baxo Bu Pudji Di Unggaran
  40. Tahun 2014. Jurnal FKM Dian Nuswantoro
  41. Semarang
  42. Abramowitz MK, Hall CB, Amodu A, Sharma D,
  43. Androga L, Hawkins M. Muscle mass, BMI, and
  44. mortality among adults in the United States: A
  45. population-based cohort study. PLoS One. 2018
  46. Apr 11;13(4):e0194697. doi:
  47. 1371/journal.pone.0194697. Erratum in:
  48. PLoS One. 2018 May 24;13(5):e0198318
  49. PMID: 29641540; PMCID: PMC5894968
  50. Tarwaka, S. Bakri. Ergonomi Untuk
  51. Keselamatan, Kesehatan Kerja dan
  52. Produktivitas. 2016
  53. Irzal. Kesehatan dan Keselamatan Kerja. Jakarta:
  54. Kencana; 2016
  55. PS AD. Dasar-Dasar Keselamatan & Kesehatan
  56. Kerja. Jember: Jember University Press; 2012. 1-
  57. p
  58. Managing Fatigue using a fatigue risk
  59. management plan (FRMP). 1st edition. London :
  60. Energy Institute 2014
  61. Effendi MV. Ergonomi, Lingkungan Kerja dan
  62. Kesehatan. 2009
  63. Granjean E. Fitting The Task To The Man. Fifth
  64. Edit. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis Inc; 2000
  65. Munandar, Ashar S. Psikologi Industry dan
  66. Organisasi, Jakarta: UI Press, 2001
  67. Aulia. Aladin. Mariaman, Tjendera
  68. HUBUNGAN KELELAHAN KERJA
  69. DENGAN KEJADIAN KECELAKAAN
  70. KERJA PADA PEKERJA GALANGAN
  71. KAPAL. Jurnal Kesmas & Gizi (JKG) Vol. 1
  72. No.1 Edisi Mei-Oktober 201

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.