FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG BERHUBUNGAN DENGAN PERSEPSI KESELAMATAN PADA PEJALAN KAKI PENGGUNA PELICAN CROSSING JL. PEMUDA KOTA SEMARANG

*Fahmi Aditya  -  Mahasiswa Peminatan Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
Ekawati Ekawati  -  Bagian Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
Bina Kurniawan  -  Bagian Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
Received: 22 Jun 2020; Published: 2 Nov 2020.
View
LEMBAR PENGESAHAN ARTIKEL
Subject
Type Research Instrument
  Download (9KB)    Indexing metadata
Open Access
Citation Format:
Abstract
Safety perception is a process of individuals that describe their impressions to the safety aspects of the environment. Some factors that affect safety perception on pedestrians are: individual characteristics, situational conditions, and environmental conditions. The study were conducted on pedestrians’ safety perception on pelican crossing that located in Jl. Pemuda, Semarang. The aim of this study is to analyze the factors that correlated with pedestrians’ safety perception. Methods of the research is analytic survey and observasional with quantitative study approach. Population of the study were all of the pedestrians’ using the pelican crossing on Jl. Pemuda. Sample linear time function was used as sampling method of this study in order to anticipate the population that was unavailable to be calculated. Data were collected using questionnaire and observation on location. The research shows that there were none of the variables that correlated with pedestrians’ safety perception. The variables included are age (p=0,510), sex (p=0,311), time of crossing (p=0,653), crossing method (p=0,544), obedience (p=0,570), conflict with vehicles (p=0,137), and unsafe acts (0,910). The research suggests the need to enforce the law for pedestrian and vehicles. The research also suggest to install the pelican crossing in many other areas of the city within large volume of pedestrian.

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Keywords: safety perception; pedestrian; pelican crossing

Article Metrics:

  1. Sari, Ratih Ardia; dkk. 2016. Analisis Perbandingan Utilitas dan Perilaku Pemanfaatan Pelican Crossing di Area Universitas Brawijaya. JEMIS Vol. 4 No. 2 Tahun 2016. Malang
  2. World Health Organization (WHO). 2013. Keselamatan Pejalan Kaki: Manual Pejalan Kaki untuk Pengambilang Keputusan dan Praktisi. Penerbit dan Penerjemah: Global Road Safety Partner-ship Indonesia
  3. PT Jasa Raharja. 2017. Laporan Tahunan Tahun 2017 PT Jasa Raharja (Persero)
  4. Ni, Y., & Cao, Y. 2017. Pedestrians’ Safety Per-ception at Signalized Inter-sections in Shanghai. Trans-portation Research Procedia, 25, 1955–1963
  5. Robbins, Stephen P. 2006. Perilaku Organisasi. Edisi ke sepuluh. Jakarta: PT. Indeks Kelompok Gramedia
  6. Cahyo, Kusyogo; et al. 2016. Perencanaan & Evaluasi Pro-mosi Kesehatan Masyarakat dan Petunjuk Pembuatan Tugas. Semarang: Ad-media-kreatif
  7. Papadimitrou, E.; et al. 2013. Patterns of pedestrian attitudes, perceptions, and behaviour in Europe. Safety Science 53, 114-122
  8. Ren, G.; et al. 2011. Crossing behaviour of pedestrians at signalized intersections: observational study and survey in China. Trans-portation Research Record: Journal of Transportation Research Board (2264), 65-73
  9. Yagil, D. 2000. Beliefs, motives and situational factors related to pedestrians self reported behaviour at signal-controlled crossings. Trans-portation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 3(1), 1-13
  10. Kang, L.; et al. 2013. Statistical analysis of pe-destrian perception of side-walk level of service in the presence of bicycles. Tran-sportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 53, 10-21
  11. Bian, Y.; et al. 2009. Pedestrians’ level of service at signalized intersections in China. Transportation Re-search Board (2114), 83-89
  12. Arhin, S.; Noel, E. C. 2007. Impact of countdown pe-destrian signals on pe-destrian behaviour and per-ception of intersection safety in the District of Columbia. Intelligent of Transportations Systems of Conference. ITSC 2007. IEEE
  13. Petritsch, et al. 2005. Level of service model for signalized intersections for pedestrians. TRB Annual Meeting 2005 CDROM
  14. Ristriana P., Amanda. 2016. Keselamatan Berjalan Kaki pada Bagian Crosswalk Berdasarkan Pedestrian En-vironment Quality Index Guna Mendukung Sustainable Ur-ban Transportation (Studi Kasus: Jl. Pahlawan Kota Semarang). Prosiding Se-minar Nasional Teknik Sipil Fakultas Teknik Mu-hammadiyah Surakarta 2016
  15. Peraturan Menteri Perhu-bungan RI Nomor 67 Tahun 2018 Tentang Marka Jalan
  16. Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif dan R&B. Bandung: Alfabeta. 2012