skip to main content

PERBANDINGAN KINERJA MUTUAL K-NEAREST NEIGHBOR (MKNN) DAN K-NEAREST NEIGHBOR (KNN) DALAM ANALISIS KLASIFIKASI KELAYAKAN KREDIT

*Annisa Sugesti  -  Departemen Statistika, Fakultas Sains dan Matematika, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Moch. Abdul Mukid  -  Departemen Statistika, Fakultas Sains dan Matematika, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Tarno Tarno  -  Departemen Statistika, Fakultas Sains dan Matematika, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright 2020 Jurnal Gaussian under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Credit feasibility analysis is important for lenders to avoid the risk among the increasement of credit applications. This analysis can be carried out by the classification technique. Classification technique used in this research is instance-based classification. These techniques tend to be simple, but are very dependent on the determination of  K values. K is number of nearest neighbor considered for class classification of new data. A small value of K is very sensitive to outliers. This weakness can be overcome using an algorithm that is able to handle outliers, one of them is Mutual K-Nearest Neighbor (MKNN). MKNN removes outliers first, then predicts new observation classes based on the majority class of their mutual nearest neighbors. The algorithm will be compared with KNN without outliers. The model is evaluated by 10-fold cross validation and the classification performance is measured by Gemoetric-Mean of sensitivity and specificity. Based on the analysis the optimal value of K is 9 for MKNN and 3 for KNN, with the highest G-Mean produced by KNN is equal to 0.718, meanwhile G-Mean produced by MKNN is 0.702. The best alternative to classifying credit feasibility in this study is K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) algorithm with K=3.

Keywords: Classification, Credit, MKNN, KNN, G-Mean.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Classification, Credit, MKNN, KNN, G-Mean

Article Metrics:

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.