DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/empati.2025.51665

ALL EYES ON RAFAH: UNDERSTANDING THE INDONESIAN BOYCOTT MOVEMENT THROUGH THE LENS OF PARASOCIAL RELATIONSHIPS WITH SOCIAL MEDIA INFLUENCERS

Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia

Received: 18 Jun 2025; Available online: 30 Aug 2025; Published: 29 Sep 2025.
Open Access Copyright 2025 Jurnal EMPATI
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Penelitian ini mengeksplorasi bagaimana hubungan parasosial dengan influencer media sosial membentuk niat konsumen untuk melakukan boikot terhadap produk yang terkait dengan konflik Palestina-Israel. Dengan mengacu pada Reasoned Action Approach dan teori emotional contagion, studi ini menempatkan interaksi parasosial sebagai kekuatan potensial dalam menggerakkan konsumerisme politik digital. Tujuan penelitian adalah untuk menguji apakah perasaan permusuhan memediasi pengaruh hubungan parasosial terhadap niat boikot. Menggunakan metode kuantitatif, data dikumpulkan dari 169 partisipan dan dianalisis dengan Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). Penelitian ini mengukur sejumlah konstruk utama seperti identifikasi diri, interaksi imajiner, sikap, permusuhan, dan niat boikot. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa hubungan parasosial memengaruhi niat boikot melalui dua jalur: secara langsung dari hubungan parasosial ke niat boikot, dan secara tidak langsung melalui mediasi perasaan permusuhan terhadap Israel. Temuan ini mengungkap mekanisme psikologis di balik bagaimana hubungan yang dimediasi dengan influencer dapat mendorong tindakan politik di dunia nyata. Studi ini menekankan peran penting keterikatan emosional dalam mendorong perilaku konsumsi politik dan memberikan wawasan baru mengenai bagaimana keterlibatan daring dapat mendorong aksi kolektif dalam masyarakat digital masa kini.

Fulltext View|Download

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
MAPPING THE TEACHERS' PSYCHOLOGICAL COMPETENCIES: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF COGNITIVE AND SOCIO-EMOTIONAL DOMAINS PERBEDAAN KECERDASAN EMOSIONAL SISWA BARU DITINJAU DARI JENIS KELAMIN DINAMIKA RELASI ORANG TUA-ANAK: STUDI INTERPRETATIVE PHENOMENOLOGICAL ANALYSIS PADA MAHASISWI TINGKAT AKHIR YANG BEKERJA More recent articles
  1. Abdul-Talib, A. N., Abd-Latif, S. A., & Abd-Razak, I. S. (2016). A study on the boycott motivations of Malaysian non-Muslims. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 7(3), 264–287. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-11-2014-0071
  2. Abdul-Talib, A. N., & Abdul-Latif, S. A. (2014b). Antecedents to willingness to boycott among Malaysian Muslims. In Emerging research on Islamic marketing and tourism in the global economy (pp. 70–106). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-6272-8.ch004
  3. Abosag, I., & Farah, M. F. (2014). The influence of religiously motivated consumer boycotts on brand image, loyalty, and product judgment. European Journal of Marketing, 48(11/12), 2262–2283. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-12-2012-0744
  4. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  5. Al Serhan, O. (2016). The impact of religiously motivated boycotts on brand loyalty among transnational consumers [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Cardiff Metropolitan University
  6. BBC. (2023, November 3). Seruan boikot Israel di media sosial, apakah akan berdampak terhadap Israel? BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/articles/c3gldnyzy7ro
  7. Boyd, A. T., Morrow, J. A., & Rocconi, L. M. (2022). Development and validation of the Parasocial Relationship in Social Media Survey. The Journal of Social Media in Society, 11(2), 192–208
  8. Daily Mail. (2012, September 4). Kangaroo leather gets the boot from Adidas: Manufacturer will no longer use product in shoes worn by Premier League stars. Daily Mail. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2197929/Kangaroo-leather-gets-boot-Adidas-Manufacturer-longer-use-product-shoes-worn-Premier-League-stars.html
  9. Dekhil, F., Jridi, H., & Farhat, H. (2017). Effect of religiosity on the decision to participate in a boycott: The moderating effect of brand loyalty—the case of Coca-Cola. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 8(2), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-12-2014-0077
  10. Dibble, J. L., Hartmann, T., & Rosaen, S. F. (2016). Parasocial interaction and parasocial relationship: Conceptual clarification and a critical assessment of measures. Human Communication Research, 42(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12063
  11. Ettenson, R., & Klein, J. G. (2005). The fallout from French nuclear testing in the South Pacific: A longitudinal study of consumer boycotts. International Marketing Review, 22(2), 199–224. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651330510593278
  12. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). An introduction to structural equation modeling. In Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R (pp. 1–47). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7_1
  13. Halimi, T. A., D’Souza, C., & Mort, G. S. (2017). Examining the role of empathy on third-country nationals’ foreign product purchase behaviour. International Marketing Review, 34(6), 760–786. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-03-2015-0050
  14. Hoffmann, S. (2013). Are boycott motives rationalizations? Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 12(3), 214–222. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1418
  15. Kim, C., Yan, X., Kim, J., Terasaki, S., & Furukawa, H. (2022). Effect of consumer animosity on boycott campaigns in a cross-cultural context: Does consumer affinity matter? Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 69, 103123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103123
  16. Klein, J. G., Smith, N. C., & John, A. (2004). Why we boycott: Consumer motivations for boycott participation. Journal of Marketing, 68(3), 92–109. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.3.92.34770
  17. Korchia, M., Fleck, N., & Le Roy, I. (2012). Celebrities in advertising: Looking for congruence or likability? Psychology & Marketing, 29(9), 651–662. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20551
  18. Lee, R., & Lee, K. T. (2013). The longitudinal effects of a two-dimensional consumer animosity. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 30(3), 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363761311328950
  19. Maher, A. A., & Mady, S. (2010). Animosity, subjective norms, and anticipated emotions during an international crisis. International Marketing Review, 27(6), 630–651. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651331011088222
  20. Mata, F., Baptista, N., Dos-Santos, M., & Jesus-Silva, N. (2023). Profiling European consumers that engage in boycotting. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Knowledge Management (ECKM) (Vol. 1, pp. 893–899). Academic Conferences International. https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85177841367
  21. Munandar, A., Yaasin, M., & Firdaus, R. (2023). Analisis sentimen netizen Indonesia mengenai boikot produk. Journal of Islamic Banking and Economics, 3(1)
  22. Neilson, L. A. (2010). Boycott or buycott? Understanding political consumerism. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9(3), 214–227. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.313
  23. Roswinanto, W., & Suwanda, S. N. (2023). Religious boycott in Indonesia: Investigation of antecedents and the effect of religiosity dimensions. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 14(1), 174–195. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-05-2020-0135
  24. Sari, D. K., & Games, D. (2024a). Investigating young consumers’ boycott behavior in an emerging market. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2362444. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2362444
  25. Sari, D. K., Mizerski, D., & Liu, F. (2017). Boycotting foreign products: A study of Indonesian Muslim consumers. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 8(1), 16–34. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-12-2014-0078
  26. Sheng, J., Kostyk, A., & Chatzipanagiotou, K. (2025). From parasocial interaction to parasocial relationship: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 49(2), e70038. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.70038
  27. Soule, S. A. (2009). Contention and corporate social responsibility. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804359
  28. Tempo. (2024a, February 22). Survei Populix: 65 persen Muslim Indonesia dukung boikot produk terafiliasi Israel. Tempo.co. https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1836607
  29. Tempo. (2024b, June 27). Penjualan produk terafiliasi Israel menurun selama kampanye All Eyes on Rafah, genjot produk lokal. Tempo.co. https://bisnis.tempo.co/read/1884681
  30. The Guardian. (2007, May 15). Milking it. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2007/may/15/medicineandhealth.lifeandhealth
  31. Tribunnews. (2023, November 15). Alasan MUI terbitkan fatwa boikot produk terafiliasi Israel: Bukan soal agama, tapi kemanusiaan. Tribunnews.com. https://m.tribunnews.com/nasional/2023/11/15/alasan-mui-terbitkan-fatwa-boikot-produk-terafiliasi-israel-bukan-soal-agama-tapi-kemanusiaan?page=all
  32. Trissetianto, A. C., & Wibowo, M. W. (2024). The influence of celebrity endorser credibility on purchase intention mediated by brand love and brand-generated brand community. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v7-i02-19
  33. van Stekelenburg, J., & Klandermans, B. (2023). A social psychology of protest: Individuals in action. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108679640

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.