DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/empati.2012.438

THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE PROSOCIAL TENDENCY REGULAR CLASSES AND SPECIAL CLASSES AT SMAN 1 AND SMAN 3 SEMARANG

Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Published: 1 Oct 2012.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Prosocial behavior as a form of social concern for the environment, including the look thinner in education, especially in grade specific and regular classes at SMAN 1 and SMAN 3 Semarang. This study aims to determine whether there is any difference between student prosocial tendencies regular classes with high school students a special class consisting of students and an Olympic-class acceleration in Semarang. The hypothesis of this study is that there are differences between students' prosocial tendencies regular classes and special classes of students.

This study used a convenient sampling technique for a special class population stands at 103 and 128 regular classroom. The data was collected prosocial tendencies scale consisting of 39 items (reliability coefficient = 0.920). Data analysis was performed with a statistical test of independent samples t test. Based on the obtained value difference test t = -0.491 with p = -0.624 (p> 0.005). Mean of 121.94 while the regular students Mean Grade special for 122.62. Descriptively, this figure means that there are differences in prosocial tendencies, but no significant relationship between students' regular classes and special classes of students.

The results of this study illustrate that the regular class students and students of special classes have a level of prosocial tendencies, but not significantly different scores because although special class students have less time because of busy but the attention of the school and the student's ability at SMAN 1 and SMAN 3 Semarang makes no difference prosocial tendencies, but no significant relationship between students' regular classes and special classes of students of SMAN 1 and SMAN 3 Semarang.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: prosocial tendencies, students regular classes, special classes of students, teenagers

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Articles
Language : IN
Recent articles
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SELF-MONITORING WITH ACADEMIC PROCRASTINATION OF STUDENTS WHO ARE WORKING ON THESIS AT FACULTY OF PSYCHOLOGY IN UNIVERSITY OF DIPONEGORO THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN WORK EFFICACY WITHJOB INSECURITY ON PRODUCTION EMPLOYEESPT “X” SEMARANG HUBUNGAN ANTARA KEPRIBADIAN EKSTRAVERSI DENGAN KEPUASAN PERKAWINAN PADA KARYAWAN WANITA DI PT INDOTAMA OMICRON KAHAR PURWOREJO More recent articles
  1. Anonim. (2011). Peran Sekolah Atasi Perilaku Membolos pada Remaja. http://sman1-smg.sch.id/2011/html/indekx.php Diakses tanggal 18-Juni 2012/
  2. Anonim. (2012). Profil SMAN 3 Semarang. Diakses pada tanggal 18-Juni 2012/ http://sman1-smg.sch.id
  3. Anonim. (2011). Perlukah ada kelas olimpiade di SMAN 8 Yogyakarta.Diakses dari http://sman8yogya.sch.id/html/index.php?id=berita&kode=58 diakses tanggal 25 juli 2012
  4. Agusetianingih, R. (2009). Perbedaan Kegiatan Belajar Antara Siswa Akseleras dan Siswa Reguler di SMA Negeri Se-Kota Malang. (Skripsi)tidak diterbitkan. Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Negeri Malang
  5. Alsa, A. (2006). Program Belajar, Jenis Kelamin, Belajar Berasar Regulasi Diri dan Prestasi Belajar Matematika pada Pelajar SMA Negeri di Yogyakarta. (Desertasi) Tidak diterbitkan
  6. Alsa.A. (2007) Keunggulan dan Kelemahan program akselerasi SMA. UGM. Yogyakarta
  7. Ali, M. & Asrori, M. (2008). Psikologi Remaja Perkembangan Anak Didik. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
  8. Azwar, S . (2008). Dasar-Dasar Psikometri. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
  9. Azwar, S (2007). Metodologi Penelitian. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar
  10. Azwar, S (2011). Penyusunan Skala Psikologi. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar
  11. Baron, R.A. & Byrne, D. (2003). Social Psychology. Ed. 10. Boston : Pearson Education
  12. Brody, L.E. & Benbow, C.P. (1987). Acceleration strategies: How effective are they for the gifted? Gifted Child Quarterly, 31, 105-110. http://cty.jhu.edu/research/biblio/html
  13. Bierhoff, H.W . (2002). Prosocial Behavior. New York : Psychology Press
  14. Carlo, Gustavo, Mestre M.V, Samper, P. Tur.A and Brian.S (2010) The longitudinal relations among dimensions of parenting styles, sympathy, prosocial moral reasoning, and prosocial behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 25:5, 425-438
  15. Darwanti, (2009). Implementasi Program Percepatan Kelas (akselerasi) di SMA Negeri 3 Surakarta tahun ajaran 2008/2009. (Skripsi) tidak diterbitkan
  16. Dayakisni, T.& Hudaniah. (2009). Psikologi Sosial. Malang : Universitas Muhamadiyah Malang
  17. Direktorat Pendidikan Luar Biasa. (2005). Diakses dari http//direktorat pendidikan luar biasa diakses pada tanggal 18 Desember 2011
  18. Duncan, S.C., Duncan, T. E., Strycker, L.A.,& Chaumeton, N.R. (2002). Relations Between Youth Antisocial and Prosocial Activities. Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 25:5, 425-438
  19. Carlo, Gustavo., Randall, Brandy A., Crockett, Lisa. J.,& Roesch, Scott, C. (2007). A Latent Growth Curve Analysis of Prosocial Behavior Among Rural Adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence. 17:2, 301-324
  20. Cresswell,W.J, (2002). Educational Research. Second edition. New York .Prestice Hall
  21. Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, (2007), Materi Sosialisasi dan pelatihan Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan Tingkat SMA
  22. Eisenberg, N. & Mussen, P. H. (1994). The Roots Of Prosocial Behavior In Children.Cambridge : Cambridge University Press
  23. Eisenberg, N. (2005). Diakses dari http//eisenberg.at.al.com: diakses pada tanggal 23 juli 2012
  24. Elliot, S.N, Kratochwill, T.R., Littlefield, J. and Travers, J.F. (1999). Educational Psychology: Effective Teaching, Effective Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company
  25. Evidia.S.(2010).Republika diakses dari //http://republika//index.php pada tanggal 20- Oktober 2011
  26. Gembeck, M.J.Z., Geiger, T.C.,Crick, N.R. 2005. Relational and Physical Aggression, Prosocial Behavior, and Peer Relation (Gender Moderation and Bidirectional Associations. Journal of Early Adolescence, Vol. 25, No. 4, 421-452
  27. Gibson, J.T. (1980). Psychology for The Classroom. Ed. 2. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc
  28. Hawadi, R.A. (2004). Akselerasi (A-Z Informasi Program Percepatan dan Anak Berbakat Intelektual). Jakarta : Gramedia
  29. Handayani, Lestari. (2010). Perbedaan Prestasi Akademik dan Non-Akademik Siswa Kelas XI Program Reguler dan Akselerasi di SMA Negeri 4 Malang. (Skripsi) tidak diterbitkan.Universitas Negeri Malang
  30. Isnandar, (2010)Hubungan Antara konsep diri denganperilaku prososial pada SMA 1 Purworjo: Skripsi (tidak diterbitkan)
  31. Jayati, C.D (2009) Perbedaan Penyesuaian sosial antara siswa akselerasi dan non akselerasi. Skripsi (tidak diterbitkan), Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
  32. Lefrancois. G.R (2000) Psychology for teaching. Ed 10. Belmond: Wadsworth Thamson Learning
  33. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia diakses dari http://kamusbahasaindonesia.org pada tanggal 02 Agustus 2012
  34. Kolesnik, W.B. (1970). Educational Psychology. Second edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company
  35. Knafo, A. & Israel, S. (2008). Genetic and Environmental Influences on Prosocial Behavior., Jerusalem : Psychology Departement The Hebrew Universitas Jerusalem
  36. Moreno, R. (2010). Edicational psychology. New York : John Wiley & Sons, Inc
  37. Mussen, P.H. (1989). Essential of Child Development and Personality. New York :Harper and Row Publisher Inc
  38. Nuraida, Hawadi, L.F. dan Moesono, A. (2007). Dampak Program Akselerasi Indonesia yang Berbasis Kurikulum Nasional Terhadap Kecerdasan Emosional Siswa Peserta Akselerasi Tingkat SMA di Jakarta. Jurnal Keberbakatan dan Kreativitas
  39. Papalia, E.D. Old, S.W. & Feldman, R.D. (2008). Human Development (Psikologi Perkembangan). Edisi kesembilan. Jakarta: Kencana
  40. Perwitasari, D. (2007). Hubungan antara Religiusitas dengan Perilaku Prososial pada Mahasiswa Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Islam Negeri. (Skripsi) tidak diterbitkan). Malang: Universitas Islam Negeri Malang
  41. Rejeki, S. (2005). Kompetensi Sosial Ditinjau dari Harga Diri dan Religiusitas pada Siswa Program Akselerasi dan Siswa Program Reguler. (Desertasi) Tidak diterbitkan. Sekolah Pasca Sarjana UGM
  42. Retnaningsih. (2005). Jurnal Peranan Kualitas Attachment, Usia dan Gender pada Perilaku Prososial. ISSN: 18582559, Depok: Universitas Gunadarma
  43. Richardson, T.M. and Benbow, C.P. (1990) Long-Term Effects of Acceleration on the Social-Emotional Adjustment of Mathematically Precocious Youths. Journal of Educational Psychology, Volume 8 No. 3, 464-470
  44. Santrock, J.W. (2007), Adolescence. Perkembangan Remaja. Edisi 6. (Alih Bahasa: adelar, Shinto, B dan Saragih, Sherly) Jakarta : Rineka Cipta
  45. Santrock, J.W. (2010), Educational Psychology. Edisi 15. University of Texas at Dallas. McGraw-Hill
  46. Sarwono, S. W. (2002). Psikologi Sosial. Jakarta : PT. RajaGrafindo Persada
  47. Sears, D.O., Freedman, J.L. and Peplau, L.A. (1994). Psikologi Sosial. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga
  48. Siddik. (2011). Diakses dari http://kelas_akselerasi_ganggu_masalah_sosial_siswa.htm Diakses pada tanggal 18-Juni 2012/Twenge, J.M., Ciarocco, N.J. and Bartels, J.M. (2007). Social Exclusion Decreases Prosocial Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol.92, no.1, 56-66
  49. Taylor, S.P & Sears, D.O . and Peplau, L.A (2005). Sosial Psychology. New Jarsey : Pearson Education International
  50. Wahab. Rahmat. (2004). Rasa Sosial Anak Akselerasi SD, SMP, SMA. Yogyakarta :Disertasi (tidak diterbitkan) PPS Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
  51. Wentzel, Kathryn.R., Filisetti, Laurence., Looney, Lisa. (2007). Adolescent Prosocial Behavior: The Role of Self-Processes and Contextual Cues. Journal of Child Development. Vol. 78, Number 3, 895-910
  52. Winarsunu, (2004). Statistik dalam penelitian Psikologi dan pendidikan. Malang : UMM
  53. Widyastono, Herry, (2006). Sistem percepatan kelas (akselerasi) bagi siswa yang memiliki kemampuan dan kecerdasan luar biasa. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan (Balitbang. Depdiknas). Vol 4. Nomer 3
  54. Woolfolk,A. (2008). Educational Psychology. edisi 4. New Jarsey : Prentice Hall

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.