DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/empati.2012.257

EFFECT OF PROBLEM POSING METHOD (PPM) TOWARD VERBAL CREATIVITY JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS IN GRADE 7th

Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Published: 1 Oct 2012.

Citation Format:
Abstract
Verbal creativity is the ability to think fluence, flexible, and original that manifested through the words. A child who has good verbal creativity will be easier to carry out activities in school and in the surrounding environment. Psychological freedom is onefactor that can develop creativity.
One alternative teaching methods that provide freedom in an atmosphere of learning is the Problem Posing Method (PPM) which is triggered by Paulo Freire. This research aims to determine the presence or absence of the influence of PPM on verbal creativity in junior high school students in grade 7th.
Characteristics of the subjects of this study were junior high school students in grade 7th, received conventional learning materials, and have never had learning by using PPM. This study uses a non-randomized pretest-posttest control group design. Subjects in the study were divided into two groups in nonrandomized, based on available classes. The selection of these two classes based on the homogeneity of the two classes in terms of teacher, the way teachers teach, subject matter, and the mid term exam. Subjects in the experimental group 33 students, while subjects in the control group 35 people. The data was collected using the Verbal Creativity Test
The results of hypothesis testing is done using the Independent Sample T Test techniques produce differences in the mean value of 3.294 with significance value less than alpha level, which is equal to 0.014 (a= 0.05). The results showed that there are significant differences in students' verbal creativity scores of the experimental group who received treatment Problem Posing Method (PPM) with a control group who did not receive treatment.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: verbal creativity, problem posing method, a test of verbal creativity, junior high school students

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Articles
Language : ID
Recent articles
LONELINESS SMARTPHONE USERS IN TERM OF GENDER DIFFERENCES IN CLASS XI STUDENTS OF SMA N 9 SEMARANG THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE PROSOCIAL TENDENCY REGULAR CLASSES AND SPECIAL CLASSES AT SMAN 1 AND SMAN 3 SEMARANG THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RESILIENCE WITH CONTINUANCE COMMITMENT OF HONORER TEACHER IN UPTD PENDIDIKAN KECAMATAN BANYUMANIK SEMARANG More recent articles
  1. Alwisol. (2005). Psikologi Kepribadian. Malang: Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
  2. Arief, A. (2002). Pengantar dan Metodologi Pendidikan Islam. Jakarta: Ciputat Pers
  3. Aulia, P. (2009). Pengaruh Tayangan Edukatif Televisi Terhadap Kreativitas Verbal Anak Usia Sekolah di SD Harapan III Medan. Skripsi. Medan. Universitas Sumatera Utara Medan
  4. Azwar, S. (2006). Pengantar Psikologi Inteligensi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
  5. Bahruddin, A. (2007).Pendidikan Alternatif Qaryah Thayyibah. Yogyakarta: LkiS
  6. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and The Psychology of Discovery and Invention. New York:HarperCollins
  7. Depdiknas. (2004). Kurikulum 2004 SMA: Pedoman Umum Pengembangan Silabus. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pusat Kurikulum (Puskurlitbang)
  8. Florida, R., Mellander, C., & Stolarick, K. (2011). Creativity and Prosperity: The Global Creativity Index. www.martinprosperity.org
  9. Freire, P. (1999). Politik Pendidikan: Kebudayaan, Kekuasaan, dan Pembebasan. Yogyakarta: REaD (Research, Education, and Dialogue)
  10. Freire, P. (2008). Pendidikan Kaum Tertindas. Jakarta: Pustaka LP3ES Indonesia
  11. Hurlock, E. B. (2005). Perkembangan Anak Jilid 2. Jakarta: Erlangga
  12. Istiqomah. (2005). Hubungan Antara Kebutuhan Belajar dan Kreativitas Verbal dengan Prestasi Belajar IPS di SMP N I Masaran. Skripsi. Surakarta: Universitas Negeri Sebelas Maret
  13. Johnson, E.B. (2008). Contextual Teaching & Learning:menjadikan kegiatan belajar- mengajar mengasyikkan dan bermakna. Bandung: MLC
  14. Kabillan, M. K. (2000). Creative and Critical Thinking in Language Classroom. The Internet Journal, Vol. VI, No. 6
  15. Kaufman, J. C. (2009). Creativity 101. New York: Springer Publishing Company
  16. Kim, K. H. (2006). Can We Trust Creativity Tests? A Review of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT). Creativity Research Journal, Vol. 18, No. 1, 3-14
  17. Korgel, B. A. (2002). An Educational Brief: Nurturing Faculty-Student Dialogue, Deep Learning and Creativity through Journal Writing Exercise. Journal of Engineering Education, 143-146
  18. Kushartanti. Sistem Pendidikan Indonesia Tidak Mendidik Siswa Kreatif (2004, 24 Mei). Kompas
  19. Latipun. (2006). Psikologi Eksperimen. Malang: UMM Press
  20. Maricha, F. (2002). Pengaruh Kreativitas Verbal terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa Kelas I Madrasah Aliyah Negeri 3 Malang. Skripsi. Malang: STAIN Malang
  21. Mulyadi, S. (2010). Effect of The Psychological Security and Psychological Freedom on Verbal Creativity of Homeshooling Student. International Journal of Business and Social Science, vol. 1 (2), 72-79
  22. Munandar, S. C. U. (1999). Kreativitas dan Keberbakatan. Jakarta: P.T. Gramedia Pustaka Utama
  23. Munandar, U. (2004). Pengembangan Kreativitas Anak Berbakat. Jakarta: P.T. Rineka Cipta
  24. Nashori, F. (2002). Mengembangkan Kreativitas dalam Perspektif Psikologi Islam.Yogyakarta: Menara Kudus
  25. Nayenggita. Penelitian Siswi SMP Islam Al Azhar 8, Kemang Pratama, Bekasi, Play Station tidak meningkatkan Kreativitas (2002, 28 Oktober). Republika
  26. Penyusun, Tim, Kamus Pusat Bahasa. (2002). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia.Jakarta: Balai Pustaka
  27. Rakhmat, J. (2002). Psikologi Komunikasi. Bandung: Remadja Karya
  28. Runco, M. A. (2007). Creativity: Theories and Themes, Research, Development, and Practice. San Diego: Academic Press
  29. Saksono, G. (2008). Pendidikan yang Memerdekakan Siswa. Yogyakarta: Rumah Belajar Yabinkas
  30. Santrock, J. W. (2002). Life – Span Development Jilid II (Alih Bahasa: Juda Damanik dan Achmad Chusairi). Jakarta: Erlangga
  31. Sarwono, S. W. (2002). Psikologi Sosial: Individu dan Teori-Teori Psikologi Sosial.Jakarta: Balai Pustaka
  32. Seniati, L., Yulianto,A., dan Setiadi, B.N. (2008). Psikologi Eksperimen. Jakarta: indeks
  33. Spener, D. (1992). What is The Freirean Approach? National Center for ESL Literacy Education. Diunduh pada tanggal 22 November 2011 pada ( http://www.cal.org/caela/esl_resources/digests/FREIREQA.html)
  34. Sternberg, J. R. & Kaufman J.C. (2010). The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity.New York: Cambridge University Press
  35. Sumantri, N. (2001). Pembaharuan Pendidikan IPS. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosda Karya
  36. Sun, P. K. (2010). The Power of Creativity. Yogyakarta: Andi (Penerbit Buku dan Majalah Rohani)
  37. Syah, M. (2004). Psikologi Pendidikan dengan Pendekatan Baru. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosda Karya
  38. Undang-undang No.20 tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional
  39. Usman, M. B. (2002). Metodologi Pembelajaran Islam. Jakarta: Ciputat Pers
  40. Walgito, B. (2004). Pengantar Psikologi Umum. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset
  41. Wechsler, S.M. (2003). Assesing Brazilian Creatity with Torrance Tests. In M.S. Stein (org) Creativity Global Correspondents-2003. New York: Winslow Press
  42. Winarsunu, T. (2004). Statistik dalam Penelitian Psikologi dan Pendidikan. Malang: UMM Press
  43. Yusri, N.A. (2004). Efektivitas Pelatihan Imajinasi terhadap Peningkatan Kreativitas Siswa. Tesis. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.