DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/empati.0.36831

PENYUSUNAN MODUL INTERVENSI STRENGTH-BASED APPROACH GUNA MENINGKATKAN ORIENTASI MASA DEPAN WARGA BINAAN PEMASYARAKATAN LAPAS PEREMPUAN KELAS IIA SEMARANG

Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Received: 5 Dec 2022; Published: 5 Dec 2022.
Open Access Copyright 2022 Jurnal EMPATI
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract
Penelitian ini adalah suatu studi pendahuluan menggunakan metode riset aksi yang bertujuan untuk menyusun modul intervensi strength-based approach (SBA) guna untuk meningkatkan orientasi masa depan pada warga binaan pemasyarakatan (WBP) di Lapas Perempuan IIA Semarang. Modul intervensi yang disusun divalidasi oleh lima orang psikolog secara kuantitatif dan kualitatif. Berdasarkan hasil validasi ahli, modul intervensi SBA yang telah disusun memiliki nilai koefisien Aiken’s V senilai 0.76 serta dilakukan revisi sesuai dengan komentar pada lembar validasi ahli. Berdasarkan validasi ahli dan setelah dilakukan revisi, penelitian ini menghasilkan modul intervensi SBA yang telah siap untuk dilakukan uji coba pada kelompok.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: orientasi masa depan; strength-based approach; warga binaan perempuan

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Articles
Language : ID
Recent articles
PENGALAMAN AYAH DALAM MENGASUH TUNANETRA: INTERPRETATIVE PHENOMENOLOGICAL ANALYSIS HUBUNGAN ANTARA KONFORMITAS DENGAN PERILAKU KONSUMTIF PEMBELIAN MERCHANDISE PADA REMAJA PENGGEMAR GRUP K-POP NCT (NEO CULTURE TECHNOLOGY) DI INDONESIA HUBUNGAN ANTARA KECERDASAN EMOSIONAL DENGAN KECEMASAN JAUH DARI SMARTPHONE PADA SISWA KELAS X SMA NEGERI 1 SEMARANG More recent articles
  1. Azwar, S. (2017). Reliabilitas dan validitas (4th ed.). Pustaka Pelajar
  2. Cortoni, F., & Gannon, T. A. (2013). What works with female offenders. In L. A. Craig, L.Dixon,
  3. & T. A. Gannon (eds.), What works in offender rehabilitation: An evidence‐based approach
  4. to assessment and treatment (pp. 271-284). Wiley-Blackwell
  5. Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2015). The systematic design of instruction. Pearson
  6. Hammond, W., & Zimmerman, R. (2012). A strengths-based perspective. Resiliency Initiatives
  7. Mason, H. D. (2019). The best that I can be: A case for a strengths-based approach during the firstyear experience. Journal of Student in Africa, 7(2), 89-108
  8. https://doi.org/10.24085/jsaa.v7i2.3827
  9. Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., Kalman, H. K., & Kemp, J. E. (2012). Designing effective instruction
  10. Wiley
  11. Pflugradt, D. M., & Cortoni, F. (2014). Women who sexually offend: A case study. In D. T
  12. Wilcox, T. Garrett, & L. Harkins (eds.), Sex offender treatment: A case study approach to
  13. issues and interventions. Wiley
  14. Pflugradt, D. M., Allen, B. P., & Marshall, W. L. (2018). A gendered strength-based treatment
  15. model for female sexual offenders. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 40, 12-18
  16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.02.012
  17. Pulla, V. (2017). Strengths-based approach in social work: A distinct ethical advantage
  18. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity, and Change, 3(2), 97-114
  19. Seginer, R. (2009). Future orientation: Developmental and ecological perspective. Springer
  20. Smith, J. E. (2014). Strengths-based therapy: Connecting theory, practice and skills. SAGE
  21. Publication
  22. Tomal, D. R. (2010). Action research for educators (2
  23. nd ed.). Rowman & Littlefield Education
  24. Van Damme, L., Fortune, C., Vandevelde, S., & Vanderplasschen, W. (2017). The good lives
  25. model among detained female adolescents. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 37, 179-189
  26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.10.002
  27. Ward, T., & Gannon, T. A. (2006). Rehabilitation, etiology, and self-regulation: The
  28. comprehensive good lives model of treatment for sexual offenders. Aggression and Violent
  29. Behavior, 11(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2005.06.001
  30. Wijayanti, D. Y. (2010). The influence of logotherapy for female prisoner in female prison of
  31. semarang. Java International Nursing Conference (pp155-153)
  32. Willetts, J., Asker, S., Carrad, N., & Winterford, K. (2014). The practice of strengths-based
  33. approach to community development in Solomon Islands. Development Studies Research
  34. An Open Access Journal 1(1), 354-367
  35. Wright, E. M., Van Voorhis, P., Salisbury, E. J., & Bauman. (2012). Gender-responsive lessons
  36. learned and policy implications for women in prison: A Review. Criminal Justice and
  37. Behavior, 1612-1632. https://doi.org/10.1080/21665095.2014.983275
  38. Wylie, L. A., & Griffin, H. L. (2013). G-map's application of the Good Lives Model to adolescent
  39. males who sexually harm: A case study. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 19(3), 345–356
  40. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2011.650715

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.