DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/empati.0.36743

PENGARUH PELATIHAN KETERAMPILAN MEMBUAT INFERENSI PADA PEMAHAMAN TEKS EKSPOSITORI

Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Received: 26 Nov 2022; Published: 26 Nov 2022.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh pelatihan keterampilan membuat inferensi terhadap pemahaman membaca dalam teks ekspositori. Pelatihan kelompok eksperimen dilakukan selama 1 x 30 menit. Ini menekankan mengaktifkan pengetahuan tentang latar belakang menggunakan metode think aloud dan pertanyaan inferensial. Kelompok kontrol tidak menerima pelatihan atau kegiatan lainnya. Kelompok eksperimen dan kontrol masing-masing terdiri dari tiga mahasiswa. Tes pemahaman membaca dibangun untuk penelitian ini. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pelatihan tidak meningkatkan pemahaman membaca teks ekspositori kelompok eksperimen. Penjelasan hasil dan rekomendasi untuk penelitian selanjutnya dibahas

Fulltext View|Download Email colleagues
Keywords: pelatihan membuat inferensi; pemahaman membaca; membaca nyaring; teks ekspositori; mahasiswa

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Articles
Language : ID
  1. Alfari, S. (2020, April 8). Prediksi soal TPS UTBK 2020. Ruang Guru. https://blog.ruangguru.com/prediksi-soal-tps-utbk-2020-pemahaman-bacaan
  2. Anderson, R. C. (1972). How to construct achievement test to assess comprehension. Review of Educational Research, 42(2), 145-170. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543042002145
  3. Barth, A. E., Barnes. M., Francis, D., Vaughn, S., & York, M. (2015). Inferential processing among adequate and struggling adolescent comprehenders and relations to reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 28, 587-609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-014-9540-1
  4. Bligh, H. F. (1965). Trends in the measurement of educational achievement. Research Article, 35(1), 34-52. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543035001034
  5. Jurnal Empati, Volume 11, Nomor 05, Oktober 2022, Halaman 344-350
  7. Bos, L. T., De Koning, B., Wassenburg, S. I., & van der Schoot, M. (2016). Training inference making skills using a situation model approach improves reading comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(116), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00116
  8. Cain, K. & Oakhill, J. V. (1999). Inference making ability and its relation to comprehension failure in young children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11, 489-503
  9. Cain, K., Oakhill, J.V., Barnes, M. A., & Bryant, P. E. (2001). Comprehension skill, inference-making ability, and their relation to knowledge. Memory & Cognition, 29(6), 850-859
  10. Clinton, V. & van den Broek, P. (2012). Interest, inferences, and learning from texts. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 650-663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.07.004
  11. Cromley, J. G., Snyder-Hogan, L. E., & Luciw-Dubas, U. A. ( 2010). Reading comprehension of scientific text: A domain-specific test of the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 687-700. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019452
  12. Elbro, C. & Buch-Iversen, I. (2013). Activation of background knowledge for inference making: Effects on reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17, 435-452. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.774005
  13. Elleman, A. M. (2017). Examining the impact of inference instruction on the literal and inferential comprehension of skilled and less skilled readers: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(6), 761-781. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/edu0000180
  14. Elleman, A. M. & Oslund, E. L. (2019). Reading comprehension research: Implication for practice and policy. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6(1), 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732218816339
  15. Hall, C. S., Vaughn, S., Barnes, M. A., Stewart, A. A., Austin, C. R., & Roberts, G. (2019). The effects of inference instruction on the reading comprehension of English learners with reading comprehension difficulties. Remedial and Special Education, 1-12. http://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518824983
  16. Kendeou, P., McMaster, K. L., & Christ, T. J. (2016). Reading comprehension: Core components and processes. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(1), 62-69. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215624707
  17. Kendeou, P. & van den Broek, P. (2007). The effects of prior knowledge and text structure on comprehension processes during reading of scientific texts. Memory & Cognition, 35(7), 1567-1577
  18. Kraal, A., Koornneef, A. W., Saab, N., & van den Broek, P. (2017). Processing of expository and narrative texts by low- and high-comprehending children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9789-2
  19. Litbang Kemendagri. (2017, Juni 13). Sejumlah hasil penelitian menarik tentang belalang kembara. Litbang Kemendagri. https://litbang.kemendagri.go.id/website/sejumlah-hasil-penelitian-menarik-tentang-belalang-kembara/
  20. McGee, A. & Johnson, H. (2003). The effect of inference training on skilled and less skilled comprehenders. Educational Psychology, 23(1), 49-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341022000022924
  21. McNamara, D. S. & Kendeou, P. (2011). Translating advances in reading comprehension research to educational practice. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4(1), 33-46
  22. Neri, N. C., Guill, K., & Retelsdorf, J. (2019). Language in science performance: Do good readers perform better? European Journal of Psychology of Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-019-00453-5
  23. Rapp, D. N., van den Broek, P., McMaster, K. L., Kendeou, P., & Espin, C. A. (2007). Higher-order comprehension processes in struggling readers: A perspective for research and intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 289-312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888430701530417
  24. Singer, M., Harkness, D., & Stewart, S. T. (1997). Constructing inferences in expository text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 24(2), 199-228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01638539709545013
  25. Suhaya, D. (2020, Januari 16). 5 fakta walang kecek. Idn Times. https://www.idntimes.com/science/discovery/dede-suhaya/fakta-walang-kecek-c1c2
  26. Van den Broek, P. (2010). Using texts in science education: Cognitive processes and knowledge representation. Science, 328(5977), 453-456
  27. Van den Broek, P., Lorch, R. F. Jr., Linderholm, T., & Gustafson, M. (2001). The effects of readers’s goals on inference generation and memory for texts. Memory & Cognition, 29(8), 1081-1087
  28. Winne, P. H., Graham, L., & Prock, L. ( 1993). A model of poor readers’ text-based inferencing: Effects of explanatory feedback. Reading Research Quarterly, 28(1), 52-66
  29. Yuill, N. & Oakhill, J. (1988). Effects of inference awareness training on poor reading comprehension. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2, 33-45
  30. Wibawa, S. W. (2017, September 27). Mengapa “laut mati” di China ini tiba-tiba berwarna-warni? Kompas.com. https://sains.kompas.com/read/2017/09/27/210700123/mengapa-laut-mati-di-china-ini-tiba-tiba-berwarna-warni-
  31. Widyaningrum, G. L. (2019, Januari 2). Kisah Doudo yang berhasil bangkit dari kekeringan dan menjadi desa nan asri. National Geographic. https://nationalgeographic.grid.id/read/131281369/kisah-doudo-yang-berhasil-bangkit-dari-kekeringan-dan-menjadi-desa-nan-asri?page=all

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.