skip to main content

ANALISIS TINGKAT KESEHATAN BANK KONVENSIONAL DAN BANK SYARIAH DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE RGEC (RISK PROFILE, GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, EARNINGS, CAPITAL)

*Nurani Insaniyati  -  Departemen Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis Universitas Diponegoro
Agus Purwanto  -  Departemen Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis Universitas Diponegoro

Citation Format:
Abstract

This study aims to examine and analyze the soundness level of conventional banks and Islamic banks based on financial ratios using the RGEC (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, Capital) method. The population in this study amounted to 147 consisting of the entire banking industry, both conventional banks and Islamic banks listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) in 2018-2020. The method of determining the sample used is purposive sampling consisting of 43 conventional banks and 6 Islamic banks. Hypothesis testing using the Mann Whitney Test with the SPSS 23 application.

            The results of this study indicate that through the calculation of the overall composite value, both conventional banks and Islamic banks are at the PK-3 rating, namely "HEALTH ENOUGH" but with different percentage values, conventional banks have a percentage of 70% while Islamic banks are 67.5%. Then there are differences between conventional banks and Islamic banks in the ratio of GCG and NIM financial performance. While the financial performance ratios of NPL/NPF, LDR/FDR, ROA, ROE, BOPO, and CAR there is no difference between conventional banks and Islamic banks.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Bank Health Level, Conventional Banking, Islamic Banking, RGEC

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.