skip to main content

Identifikasi Perilaku Pengunjung Pengguna Ruang Publik Taman Indonesia Kaya, Kota Semarang

*Cindy Barry Napitupulu  -  Balai Prasarana Permukiman Wilayah Papua, Indonesia, Indonesia
Grandy Loranessa Wungo  -  Departemen Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota Fakultas Teknik Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract
Public space in general has a definition as an element of the built and natural environment, public and private, external and internal, rural and urban, where visitors have freedom and access that has no boundaries. The formation of the uniqueness of public space is based on the relationship between the built environment and human behavior patterns. Behavior refers to the reaction or response to the impulse that affects it. A person's way of behaving cannot be equalized because a person's response will be different to the impulses that affect him. The existence of Taman Indonesia Kaya as an open public space is an important element in order to create a city space that is fun, livable and attractive to urban people. The phenomenon in Taman Indonesia Kaya in relation to the built environment with humans is conflicts between space users based on age groups. The purpose of this research is to identify visitor behavior in using Taman Indonesia Kaya. The research method used in this study is to use quantitative methods, as well as the analysis used, namely descriptive statistical analysis and Behaviour Mapping analysis. The results obtained from this research resulted in the characteristics of visitors with adolescent age groups and the dominance of jogging and sitting on the ground behavior.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Perilaku;Ruang Publik;Taman Indonesia Kaya

Article Metrics:

  1. Bozkurt, M. (2016). Digital age for observations: The use of gis for analysing observations and behaviour mapping. Journal of Digital Landscape Architecture, 2016(1), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.14627/537612003
  2. Carmona, M., De Magalhães, C., & Hammond, L. (2021). Public space: The management dimension. In Public Space Reader. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351202558-38
  3. David. (n.d.). Teori Metodologi Penelitian
  4. Effendi, D. D. (n.d.). Pola Perilaku Masyarakat Terhadap Pemanfaatan Ruang Terbuka Publik Di Pusat Kota Ternate. 148, 148–162
  5. Fisher, C. (2011). Nature in the city: Urban environmental history and central park. OAH Magazine of History, 25(4), 27–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/oahmag/oar038
  6. Saito, K., & Hanaizumi, H. (2017). Detection of Different Behavior from The Majority in A Public Space. 255–261. https://doi.org/10.12792/icisip2017.047
  7. Svensdotter, A., & Guaralda, M. (2018). Dangerous Safety or Safely Dangerous. Perception of safety and self-awareness in public space. The Journal of Public Space, 3(1), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.5204/jps.v3i1.319
  8. Travlou, P., & Thompson, C. W. (2007). Open space: People space. Open Space: People Space, 1–199. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203961827
  9. Widiastuti, K. (2013). Taman Kota Dan Jalur Hijau Jalan Sebagai Ruang Terbuka Hijau Publik Di Banjarbaru. Taman Kota Dan Jalur Hijau Jalan Sebagai Ruang Terbuka Hijau Publik Di Banjarbaru, 13(2), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.14710/mdl.13.2.2013.57-64

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.