DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/tpwk.2024.34810

Multimodalitas Transportasi Non-Motorized Kawasan Halte BRT Kota Yogyakarta

*Refli Widianto  -  PT. Bank Negara Indonesia Jakarta, Indonesia
Anita Ratnasari Rakhmatulloh  -  Departemen Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota Fakultas Teknik Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

In order to maintain sustainability, the transportation system must consider environmental factors. Lack of public interest is a problem for the implementation of BRT as an effort to transition to sustainable transportation. In an effort to increase the variety of services, it is crucial to have access to transportation options, notably non-motorized, low-pollution vehicles. Descriptive and buffered analysis utilizing GIS is therefore used in this study to identify the characteristics of multimodal non-motorized transportation. The study's findings highlight the dearth of transportation options around bus stops, particularly when considering the effectiveness of non-motorized transportation. The majority of multimodal connection has uniform or homogenous properties.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Multimoda;Bus Rapid Transit;Transportasi Non-Motorized

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : ID
Recent articles
Integrasi Gender dalam Perencanaan Pembangunan Desa melalui SDGs Desa di Desa Kemojing, Cilacap Preferensi Pengguna Terhadap Rancangan Desain Fasilitas Integrasi Antarmoda Yang Responsif Pandemi COVID-19 Di Kawasan TOD Dukuh Atas Kajian Perubahan Kondisi Ekologi Wilayah DAS Garang dan Aktivitas Penduduk yang Mempengaruhinya More recent articles
  1. Boske, L. B. (1998). Multimodal/Intermodal Transportation in the United States, Western Europe, and Latin America: Governmental Policies, Plans, and Programs. School of Public Affairs
  2. Diana, M., & Mokhtarian, P. L. (2009). Desire to change one’s multimodality and its relationship to the use of different transport means. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 12(2), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2008.09.001
  3. Duarte, F., & Rojas, F. (2012). Intermodal Connectivity to BRT: A Comparative Analysis of Bogotá and Curitiba. Journal of Public Transportation, 15(2), 1–18
  4. Gusleni, Y. (2017). Pelayanan Penumpang di Stasiun Serang Dalam Perspektif Transportasi Antarmoda. Jurnal Transportasi Multimoda, 14(2), 55–66
  5. Kim, B.-K., Ha, O.-K., Shin, H.-J., Kim, H.-K., & Wang, Y.-D. (2014). Development of Intermodal Connectivity Index for High-Speed Rail. Journal of the Korean Society for Railway, 17(1), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.7782/jksr.2014.17.1.59
  6. Levinson, H. S., Zimmerman, S., & Clinger, J. (2003). Bus Rapid Transit Synthesis of Case Studies
  7. Psaltoglou, A., & Calle, E. (2018). Enhanced connectivity index – A new measure for identifying critical points in urban public transportation networks. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, 21, 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcip.2018.02.003
  8. Susanta, F. F., & Aditya, T. (2020). Visualisasi Pemodelan Hasil Analisis Jaringan Angkutan Umum di Kabupaten Kulon Progo. Geomatika, 26(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.24895/jig.2020.26-1.1085
  9. Trisnawati, Y., Sunaryo, B.(2014). Keberadaan Moda Transportasi Umum Tidak Bermotor Dalam Mendukung Aktivitas Pariwisata Di Kawasan Malioboro, Yogyakarta. In Jurnal Teknik PWK (Vol. 3). http://ejournal-s1.undip.ac.id/index.php/pwk
  10. Woldeamanuel, M., & Olwert, C. (2016). The Multimodal Connectivity at Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Stations and the Impact on Ridership. Source: Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, 55(1), 87–102

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.