DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/tpwk.2022.30973

EVALUASI RUTE BUS RAPID TRANSIT (BRT) BERDASARKAN ASPEK KETERJANGKAUAN (STUDI KASUS: KOTA SEMARANG)

*Frida Khairunisa Kundani  -  PT. Himalaya Everest Jaya, Jakarta, Indonesia
Yudi Basuki  -  Departemen Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota Fakultas Teknik Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

The transportation system is affected by activity, movement, and network. If a transportation system is unable to keep up with the activities and movements of the community, there will be various transportation system problems such as networks. One of the problems in meeting the needs of the community movement is the uneven range of BRT services. The results of the analysis conducted by researchers based on the results of analysis of existing BRT service routes obtained that 72% of areas in Semarang city are already served, but based on the results of the analysis of brt service route recommendations obtained that 86% of areas in Semarang city are already served brt routes.. Based on the results of the study, there is 1 BRT route recommendation and 3 feeder route recommendations (PP).

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext View|Download |  common.other
Untitled
Subject
Type Other
  Download (B)    Indexing metadata
Keywords: AHP; Bus Rapid Transit; Evaluation; GIS.

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : ID
Recent articles
Tingkat Efektivitas Promosi Balai Taman Nasional Karimunjawa Pada Ekowisata Bahari Hutan Mangrove Taman Nasional Karimunjawa Persepsi Masyarakat Terhadap Jasa Ekosistem Perkebunan Teh Medini, Kabupaten Kendal Prioritas Pemilihan Moda transportasi Wisata Menuju Objek Wisata Lawang Sewu, Kota Semarang More recent articles
  1. Bawana, S. A., & Rachmawati, R. (2020). Evaluasi Lokasi Eksisting Halte Bus Rapid Transit Trans Jogja. Jurnal Manajemen Transportasi & Logistik, 7(1), 1-12
  2. Beimborn, E.A., Greenwald M.J, dan Jin X. (2003). Accessibility, Connectivity, and Captivity: Impacts on Transit Choice. Journal of Transportation
  3. Departmental Government of Montevideo. (2010). Plan Montevideo. Memoria de Ordenación, Montevideo
  4. Direktorat Jenderal Perhubungan Darat. (1996). Pedoman Teknis Penyelenggaraan Angkutan Penumpang Umum di Wilayah Perkotaan dan Trayek Tetap dan Teratur. Direktorat Jenderal Perhubungan Darat. Jakarta
  5. Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan Nomor 10 Tahun 2012 Tentang Standar Pelayanan Minimal Angkutan Massal Berbasis Jalan
  6. Ramanathan, R. (2006). Data Envelopment Analysis For Weight Derivation and Aggregation In The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Computers & Operations Research, 33(5), 1289-1307
  7. Rodrigue, Jean Paul. (2003). Transportation and The Environment. Department of Economics & Geography Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY, USA
  8. Saaty, Thomas L. (1993). The Analytical Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Pers
  9. Tamin, Ofyar Z. (2000). Perencanaan dan Permodelan Transportasi. Bandung : ITB
  10. Tavana, M., & Hatami-Marbini, A. (2011). A Group AHP-TOPSIS Framework For Human Spaceflight Mission Planning At NASA. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(11), 13588-13603
  11. TDM Encyclopedia. (2019). Bus System Design Features that Significantly Improve Service Quality and Cost Efficiency. Bus Rapid Transit. Victoria Transport Policy Insitute
  12. Thomas, E. (2001). Bus Rapid Transit. Presentation At The Institute Of Transportation Engineers, Annual Meeting, Chicago, August

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.