DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/tpwk.2019.25377

Penilaian Kesesuaian Aktivitas Pengunjung Kawasan Sport Center Kudus dengan Metode Skoring

*Ferdizza Yaurma Hanatya  -  Departemen Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota Fakultas Teknik Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Landung Esariti  -  Departemen Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota Fakultas Teknik Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

There are various kinds of problems in the Kudus Sport Center area, such as ldan conflicts by street vendors dan criminal acts such as theft. Based on these problems there is a mismatch of visitor activity that takes place in the region. This study aims to assess the suitability of visitor activities in utilizing the Kudus Sport Center area. The analysis used was descriptive analysis dan scoring with 5 variables which were reduced to 18 assessment indicators. These variables are ease of accessibility to the area, availability of facilities, condition of facilities, security, dan activities that take place in the Kudus Sport Center area. Data used from the results of the questionnaire to 90 respondents, interviews, dan observations. The results of this study are the appraisal of the suitability of the activities of the Kudus Sport Center area of 67.56% which is included in the medium category, so that there are still assessment indicators that have not been applied in the area. The indicator according to the priority of its handling is that it can be reached by public transportation dan sports dan recreation facilities that are free from garbage dan standing water.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Suitability of Public Spaces, Public Spaces, Kudus Sport Center Area

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Recent articles
Evaluasi Program Penataan Koridor Kalireyeng di Kelurahan Kebondalem Kecamatan Kendal Kabupaten Kendal Tingkat Keberhasilan Kawasan Semarang Bridge Fountain sebagai Ruang Publik Perkotaan Tingkat kerentanan sosial pada kawasan kumuh di Kelurahan Rejomulyo, Kecamatan Semarang Timur More recent articles
  1. Anderson, A. dkk. (2019) ‘Managerial perceptions of factors affecting the design dan delivery of sport for health programs for refugee populations’, Sport Management Review. Sport Management Association of Australia dan New Zealand, 22(1), pp. 80–95. doi: 10.1016/j.smr.2018.06.015
  2. Carmona, M. dkk. (2003) Public Places - Urban Spaces The Dimensions of Urban Design. London: Architectural Press London
  3. Carr, S. dkk. (1992) Public Space. USA: Cambridge University Press
  4. England, S. (2005) ‘Spatial Planning for Sport dan Active Recreation’, in Assembly, pp. 1–29
  5. Gehl, J. dan Svarre, B. (2013) How to Study Public Life. London: Isldan Press
  6. Heinrichs, D., Goletz, M. dan Lenz, B. (2017) ‘Negotiating territory: Strategies of informal transport operators to access public space in urban Africa dan Latin America’, Transportation Research Procedia. Elsevier B.V., 25, pp. 4507–4517. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.346
  7. McCormack, G. R. dkk. (2010) ‘Characteristics of urban parks associated with park use dan physical activity: A review of qualitative research’, Health dan Place. Elsevier, 16(4), pp. 712–726. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.03.003
  8. Mutiara, S. dan Isami, K. (2012) ‘Characteristic of Public Small Park Usage in Asia Pacific Countries: Case Study in Jakarta dan Yokohama City’, Procedia - Social dan Behavioral Sciences, 35(December 2011), pp. 412–419. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.02.106
  9. Nasution, A. D. dan Zahrah, W. (2015) ‘The Space is Not Ours, the Life of Public Open Space in Gated Community in Medan, Indonesia’, Procedia - Social dan Behavioral Sciences. Elsevier B.V., 202(December 2014), pp. 144–151. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.217
  10. Siregar, J. P. (2014) ‘Assessment of Public Space Quality Using Good Public Space Index (Case Study of Merjosari Sub District, Municipality of Malang, Indonesia)’, Procedia - Social dan Behavioral Sciences. Elsevier B.V., 135, pp. 10–17. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.318
  11. Villanueva, K. dkk. (2015) ‘Developing indicators of public open space to promote health dan wellbeing in communities’, Applied Geography. Elsevier Ltd, 57, pp. 112–119. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.12.003
  12. Wang, D. dkk. (2015) ‘Factors influencing perceived access to urban parks: A comparative study of Brisbane (Australia) dan Zhongshan (China)’, Habitat International. Elsevier Ltd, 50, pp. 335–346. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.08.032

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.