DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/empati.2026.55782

RELIGIOSITAS DAN PENERIMAAN TERHADAP KEKERASAN DALAM RUMAH TANGGA

Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Jalan Ir. Sutami No.36, Jebres, Kota Surakarta, Jawa Tengah 57126, Indonesia

Received: 25 Feb 2026; Published: 31 Aug 2026.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Kekerasan dalam rumah tangga masih menjadi permasalahan sosial di tengah masyarakat yang memiliki tingkat religiositas tinggi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis keterkaitan antara religiositas dan penerimaan terhadap kekerasan dalam rumah tangga, khususnya kekerasan suami terhadap istri serta orang tua terhadap anak. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan desain survei berbasis data World Values Survey gelombang kedelapan yang melibatkan 2.308 responden di Indonesia. Religiositas diukur melalui indikator keyakinan dan praktik keagamaan, sedangkan penerimaan terhadap kekerasan diukur melalui penilaian responden terhadap tindakan kekerasan dalam keluarga. Analisis data dilakukan menggunakan korelasi Spearman dan regresi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya keterkaitan negatif yang sangat lemah antara religiositas dan penerimaan kekerasan suami terhadap istri, serta tidak ditemukan keterkaitan yang berarti antara religiositas dan penerimaan kekerasan orang tua terhadap anak. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa religiositas memiliki peran yang terbatas dalam menjelaskan penerimaan terhadap kekerasan dalam rumah tangga.

Fulltext View|Download Email colleagues
Keywords: kekerasan dalam rumah tangga; masyarakat indonesia; religiositas; world values survey wave 8

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Articles
Language : ID
  1. Akbary, M., Sarwari, A., & Rasooly, M. H. (2020). Sociocultural determinants of attitudes toward domestic violence among women and men in Afghanistan: Evidence from Afghanistan Demographic and Health Survey 2015. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(5-6), 2345-2368. doi.org/10.1177/0886260520980400
  2. Amir-ud-Din, R., Fatima, S., & Aziz, S. (2021). Is attitudinal acceptance of violence a risk factor? An analysis of domestic violence against women in Pakistan. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(11-12), 5181-5206. doi.org/10.1177/0886260518787809
  3. Begum, S., & Kavlu, A. (2023). Justification of Parental Violence–A Cross country Analysis Evidence from World Values Survey-Variances based on Gender, Age and Education. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 10(3), 204-217
  4. Chon, D. S. (2021). Muslims, Religiosity, and Attitudes Toward Wife Beating: Analysis of the World Values Survey. International Criminology, 1(2), 150-164. doi.org/10.1007/s43576-021-00016-z
  5. Choudhury, A. A., Martland, N., & Luzon, O. (2025). Women’s experiences of coercive control in intimate partner relationships: A qualitative systematic review. Journal of Family Violence. link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10896-025-00970-6
  6. Davarcı, N., Şenol, D., & Şirin, A. (2016). Çocukların aile içinde şiddete maruz kalmaları ve dindarlıkları üzerine ampirik bir araştırma [An empirical study on children's exposure to domestic violence and their religiosity]. Bilimname, 2016(14), 123-145. doi.org/10.21646/BILIMNAME.2016.14
  7. DeRose, L. F., Salazar-Arango, A., Corcuera, P. F., & Gas-Aixendri, M. (2021). Couple religiosity, male headship, intimate partner violence, and infidelity. Review of Religious Research, 63, 661-686. doi.org/10.1007/S13644-021-00461-2
  8. Fidan, A. (2023). Women's attitudes toward intimate partner violence in Turkey: The role of leisure activities, religiosity, and patriarchy. Fenerbahçe University Journal of Social Sciences, 3(1), 1-18. doi.org/10.58620/fbujoss.1189271
  9. Gebauer, J. E., Bleidorn, W., Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., Lamb, M. E., & Potter, J. (2014). Cross-cultural variations in Big Five relationships with religiosity: A sociocultural motives perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(6), 1064-1091
  10. Gebre, T. (2023). Power and control: Understanding domestic violence dynamics. International Journal of Family Studies, 29(2), 156-172
  11. Golriz, M., Macy, R. J., & Martin, S. L. (2021). The effects of religion and modernization on Egyptian women's IPV attitudes. Violence Against Women, 27(15-16), 2877-2899. doi.org/10.1177/1077801220978802
  12. Haerpfer, C., Inglehart, R., Moreno, A., Welzel, C., Kizilova, K., Diez-Medrano, J., Lagos, M., Norris, P., Ponarin, E., & Puranen, B. (2022). World Values Survey: Round seven – Country-level results (2017–2020). World Values Survey Association. www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV7.jsp
  13. Hassan, G. (2024). Culture and public support for violence against children in six nations. Journal of Family Issues, 45(12), 3234-3256. doi.org/10.1177/0192513x241263776
  14. Huber, S., & Huber, O. W. (2012). The Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS). Religions, 3(3), 710-724. doi.org/10.3390/rel3030710
  15. Jung, J. H., & Olson, D. V. (2017). Where Does Religion Matter Most? Personal Religiosity and the Acceptability of Wife‐beating in Cross‐National Perspective. Sociological Inquiry, 87(4), 608-633
  16. Kaya, A., & Çelik, M. (2021). The relationship between religiosity and attitudes toward domestic violence: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Family Violence, 36(7), 789-801
  17. Kementerian Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Perlindungan Anak (KemenPPPA). (2024). Jumlah Kasus dan Korban Kekerasan terhadap Anak menurut Tahun Penginputan. siga.kemenpppa.go.id/pencarian?topik=MTg3
  18. Komisi Nasional Anti Kekerasan terhadap Perempuan (Komnas Perempuan). (2021). Catatan tahunan kekerasan terhadap perempuan tahun 2021. Jakarta: Komnas Perempuan
  19. Kposowa, A. J., Ezzat, D. A., & Breault, K. D. (2019). Religiosity, conservatism, and acceptability of anti-female spousal violence in Egypt. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(1), 52-73. doi.org/10.1177/0886260516660976
  20. Mshweshwe, L. (2020). Understanding domestic violence: masculinity, culture, traditions. Heliyon, 6(10). doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05334
  21. Nason-Clark, N., & Fisher-Townsend, B. (2015). Men who abuse and the faith community. In R. Geffner, J. W. White, L. K. Hamberger, A. Rosenbaum, V. Vaughan-Eden, & V. I. Vieth (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal violence and abuse across the lifespan (pp. 1-23). Springer
  22. Park, S., Lee, J., & Kim, H. (2024). Interpersonal violence in five regions in Asia: Ecological risk factors associated with perceptions of justifiability of violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 39(17-18), 3456-3478. doi.org/10.1177/08862605241271418
  23. Stavrova, O., Fetchenhauer, D., & Schlösser, T. (2013). Why are religious people happy? The effect of the social norm of religiosity across countries. Social Science Research, 42(1), 90-105
  24. Sugiyono. (2023). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta
  25. United Nations Development Programme. (2023, December 10). Unite to eliminate violence against women in the Arab region. UNDP Arab States. www.undp.org/arab-states/stories/unite-eliminate-violence-against-women-arab-region
  26. Whitten, T., Tzoumakis, S., Green, M. J., & Dean, K. (2024). Global prevalence of childhood exposure to physical violence within domestic and family relationships in the general population: A systematic review and proportional meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 25(2), 1411-1430
  27. Woodberry, R. D., Johnson, K. A., Case, B., Bradshaw, M., VanderWeele, T. J., & Johnson, B. R. (2025). Religious centrality across 22 countries. Scientific reports, 15(1), 15081. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-99183-6
  28. World Health Organization (WHO). (2021). Devastatingly pervasive: 1 in 3 women globally experience violence. https://www.who.int/news/item/09-03-2021-devastatingly-pervasive-1-in-3-women-globally-experience-violence
  29. World Values Survey Association. (2025). World Values Survey Wave 8 (WVS-8) questionnaire. www.worldvaluessurvey.org
  30. Yang, Y. (2021). Religion and attitudes towards intimate partner violence: A cross-national study. The Arbutus Review, 12(1), 104-120. doi.org/10.18357/TAR121202120181

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.